• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

can someone explain to me why this exists when smart tv's are your only option for 4k anyway? so confused...

Status
Not open for further replies.
100Mbps is more than enough. That can easily support two streams of UHD 4K with full surround sound with another 30+Mbps to spare.
two uncompressed streams, streaming services like Amazon Prime (Netflix also uses AWS) compress the hell out of stream so even a 4k movie is coming in between 3-8 Mbps. I don't think Hulu streaming at 1080p even breaks 2Mbps.
 
That's all well and dandy but it's still a dated standard and weird that the wifi link can outperform it, particularly if transfering media files to tv storage
Dated, maybe but weird? Nah!

How is that different from brand new, top of the line motherboards still coming with USB 2.0? Look at all the external drive enclosures that support USB 2.0 only.

Or brand new networkable printing devices coming with wifi only, no Ethernet?

Selaya is right - wifi is easier to market and that is largely due to users hating to deal with cables - not to mention the aesthetics of cables.

Don't misunderstand me, I get what you are saying. And for sure, if 100Mbps couldn't easily handle anything you threw at it, that would be a different ball game. But a 1Gbps network adapter in a smart TV is really just a waste of capability. And besides, if they put a 1Gbps adapter in there, you likely would have had to pay at least 100 more pennies for the TV! ;)
 
Same, but I only get 5Mbps out of mine...
Capture.PNG


Weird thing was my plan is 150/15 , so the upload speed was a bit unusual and couldn't reproduce that on my PC haha...
That result on the TV was by wifi ac.
 
That's all well and dandy but it's still a dated standard and weird that the wifi link can outperform it, particularly if transfering media files to tv storage
still better latency and less potential interference on hard wire even at 100Mbps
 
View attachment 196825

Weird thing was my plan is 150/15 , so the upload speed was a bit unusual and couldn't reproduce that on my PC haha...
That result on the TV was by wifi ac.
What if you run the speed test built into the Netflix app, assuming you use Netflix.
 
What if you run the speed test built into the Netflix app, assuming you use Netflix.
Just checked, I don't have a speedtest in my (Dutch)Netflix app...:confused:

I'm using wired internet normally on my TV, download speed was around 9mbps or so, 4K Netflix , Primevideo and others always without hiccups once playing.
 
Last edited:
Our speeds are very respectable, unlike my brother in the UK who somehow manages with 3Mbps o_O
TV-SPEED-WIRED (Medium).jpg TV-SPEED-WIFI (Medium).jpg
 
For ads, you can block ad domains in your router. Youtube however cannot be helped easily, unless you have Android.
 
Just checked, I don't have a speedtest in my (Dutch)Netflix app...:confused:

I'm using wired internet normally on my TV, download speed was around 9mbps or so, 4K Netflix , Primevideo and others always without hiccups once playing.
Sure you do, go into help and networking, it's a bit hidden.
 
still better latency and less potential interference on hard wire even at 100Mbps
Funny you say that. A bit back, the set was having "red stripe" artifacts for some users and the temporary fix (before the firmware one) was to turn off the wifi.
 
@TheLostSwede ok found it:

Wired:
Capture.PNG



Since I got a Premium account 84 Mbps is more than enough, 25 Mbps for 4K.
Capture.PNG
 
Last edited:
U guys should really connect your pcs to tv via hifi. It is kinda good all around instead of the measly mobile compression artifacts(vp9) in your tv boxes.

AV1 is good and VVC is gooder still, but I bet nobody with a tv box cares enough to upgrade, so an htpc is your best bet.
 
U guys should really connect your pcs to tv via hifi. It is kinda good all around instead of the measly mobile compression artifacts(vp9) in your tv boxes.

AV1 is good and VVC is gooder still, but I bet nobody with a tv box cares enough to upgrade, so an htpc is your best bet.
Yes, because I want to run a 30m active HDMI cable for $300 to the ground floor of the house...
 
can someone explain to me why this exists when smart tv's are your only option for 4k anyway?

For the same reason you have a Ryzen 5600x based PC and even though you can go to the town dump and get a Phenom II x6 based PC for free
I rather find a plasma that's still working well at a town dump or of course a CRT, LOL.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Cai
Have you tried transmitting over wifi? I did it. It works.
PS: You'd do it over LAN in this case. Install Splashtop.
Eh? How does that connect my PC to my TV without using the built in "smarts"?

So you can get up to Full HD.
On a good day, yes. When the TV doesn't want to play along, it just buffers and you have to try multiple times before it starts streaming. Very annoying.
 
Eh? How does that connect my PC to my TV without using the built in "smarts"?
You either install 'splashtop' on your smart tv, or the device receiving the routed video. Not so hard.
PS: a router, or modem with router function can send quite high bandwidths over cable without issues. Don't send over hdmi is the message. It is the amateur way.
 
So you can get up to Full HD.
P_20210416_173838.jpg

You either install 'splashtop' on your smart tv, or the device receiving the routed video. Not so hard.
PS: a router, or modem with router function can send quite high bandwidths over cable without issues. Don't send over hdmi is the message. It is the amateur way.
So how is that using your PC?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top