• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Disable GeForce GTX 580 Power Throttling using GPU-Z

Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
1,675 (0.60/day)
Likes
298
Location
London
System Name Jaspe
Processor i7 3820 4.4Ghz
Motherboard BIOSTAR TPower X79
Cooling Thermalright Archon Rev. A
Memory 16Gb G.Skill Ripjaws 1866mhz
Video Card(s) AMD 290X
Storage Crucial M500 WD 600Gb Velociraptor
Display(s) AOC Q2778VQE
Case In Win GRone
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Antec Signature 650
Software Windows 10 Home
#26
sure but 350watt:eek: :wtf::wtf::wtf: my whole pc consume 330
My whole pc consume 360w when gaming and that's off the wall, the pc would consume around 317w assuming 88% efficiency.
 
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
193 (0.06/day)
Likes
40
System Name NERV
Processor AMD FX8320@4.0 GHz
Motherboard ASUS M5A97 Evo R2.0
Cooling Zalman CNPS11X Extreme + Scythe Slipstream
Memory 2x4 Corsair XMS3 1866MHz
Video Card(s) Asus GTX760 2GB DirectCU
Storage Samsund SSD 840 - 250GB
Display(s) HP 2311X
Case CM690-III
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair RM650
Software Win 7 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores No bech, only game!
#27
I heard W1z is magic.... isn't it?
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
1,675 (0.60/day)
Likes
298
Location
London
System Name Jaspe
Processor i7 3820 4.4Ghz
Motherboard BIOSTAR TPower X79
Cooling Thermalright Archon Rev. A
Memory 16Gb G.Skill Ripjaws 1866mhz
Video Card(s) AMD 290X
Storage Crucial M500 WD 600Gb Velociraptor
Display(s) AOC Q2778VQE
Case In Win GRone
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Antec Signature 650
Software Windows 10 Home
#28
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
2,817 (0.79/day)
Likes
604
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 1600
Motherboard Asrock Taichi
Cooling NH-C14
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 2 * Samsung 1 TB HD103UJ
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Corsair Obsidian 650D
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Mouse Logitech Performance MX
Software Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
#30
I just have a couple of questions:

- Are there any performance gains when not limiting?

- Is it worth it to remove the limiter?
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,659 (1.31/day)
Likes
1,009
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
#31
This isn't going to burn anything out. The best use of this would be 15-20 minute stress testing sessions to ensure your overclock stability. Even doing it a dozen times isn't going to hurt anything, and you're unlikely to need to do it any more often than that.

Funny though, 350w makes it seem like the card isn't anymore power efficient at all.
 
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
193 (0.06/day)
Likes
40
System Name NERV
Processor AMD FX8320@4.0 GHz
Motherboard ASUS M5A97 Evo R2.0
Cooling Zalman CNPS11X Extreme + Scythe Slipstream
Memory 2x4 Corsair XMS3 1866MHz
Video Card(s) Asus GTX760 2GB DirectCU
Storage Samsund SSD 840 - 250GB
Display(s) HP 2311X
Case CM690-III
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair RM650
Software Win 7 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores No bech, only game!
#32
but don't tell anyone or they might tax it
Sure, it will be our little secret :pimp:

Back in topic: nice performance/watt ratio for this 580, rly :laugh: compared to 'old' gtx480... 480 has no power throttling cheat, right?
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
3,684 (1.00/day)
Likes
402
Location
Smithfield, WV
System Name Felix777
Processor Core i5-3570k@stock
Motherboard Biostar H61
Memory 8gb
Video Card(s) XFX RX 470
Storage WD 500GB BLK
Display(s) Acer p236h bd
Case Haf 912
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Rosewill CAPSTONE 450watt
Software Win 10 x64
#33
So basically, Nvidia implemented a 2nd throttle at the software level to make power consumption level's of the GTX 580 look lower? that's what i'm getting out of this. Course, we need to wait and see what results other users of the GTX 580's get.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
381 (0.13/day)
Likes
65
Location
Lost in space
System Name Geting old
Processor AMD Phenom II X4 940 Processor BE 3.8 Ghz
Motherboard MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL.. MS-7388 1.0
Cooling CORSAIR H50 water cooler
Memory 8 GB of Patriot Extreme Performance DDR2 4GB (2 x 2GB)PC2-6400 Enhanced Latency
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
Storage Seagate Barracuda 1 TB
Display(s) LG FLATRON W2361V 23"
Case RAIDMAX SMILODON
Audio Device(s) HD Realtek
Power Supply Two 1000W ULTRA X3 wired together
Mouse Logitech G9x Laser
Keyboard Corsair K65 RGB
Software Windows 10 pro
#34
Wonder if you RMA a burn card will they know that power throttling was disable??? :eek:
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
5,230 (1.48/day)
Likes
661
Location
IRAQ-Baghdad
System Name MASTER
Processor Core i7 3930k run at 4.4ghz
Motherboard Asus Rampage IV extreme
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 4x4G kingston hyperx beast 2400mhz
Video Card(s) 2X EVGA GTX680
Storage 2X Crusial M4 256g raid0, 1TbWD g, 2x500 WD B
Display(s) Samsung 27' 1080P LED 3D monitior 2ms
Case CoolerMaster Chosmos II
Audio Device(s) Creative sound blaster X-FI Titanum champion,Creative speakers 7.1 T7900
Power Supply Corsair 1200i, Logitch G500 Mouse, headset Corsair vengeance 1500
Software Win7 64bit Ultimate
Benchmark Scores 3d mark 2011: testing
#35
great w1zzard nice work, i don't like crappy card without overclocking
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Messages
597 (0.15/day)
Likes
63
Location
Under Columbus, Ohio
System Name Gen0cide
Processor AMD Phenom x4 920 2.8 @ 3.36 1.44v
Motherboard Asus M2N-Deluxe + WiFi
Cooling Thermoright True Rev C
Memory 2x 2gig of Gskill DDR2 1066 @ 5-5-5-15 20 2.125v
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 250 GTS 1 Gig
Storage 5x 730gig 7,200 RPM Raid 5 Western Digital Black
Display(s) Neovo F-417
Case Antec Twelve Hundred
Audio Device(s) On-Board
Power Supply SeaSonic M12 SS-600HM
Software Windows 7 x64 / Arch Linux-fluxbox(duel Boot)
#36
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
9,950 (2.25/day)
Likes
2,309
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
#37
Nvidia; They didn;t like wood screws. So we foudn another use for them.



We put a wood block under the throttle.


 
Joined
Sep 5, 2004
Messages
1,870 (0.39/day)
Likes
249
Location
The Kingdom of Norway
System Name Wiak's Gaming Rig 2017
Processor Ryzen 1700X
Motherboard ASUS PRIME X370-PRO
Cooling Noctua
Memory Corsair Vengenace LPX 3200 CL16 @ 2933
Video Card(s) MSI Radeon 480 8GB Gaming X
Storage Samsung 960 EVO 500GB / Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
Case Corsair 200R
Power Supply Corsair AX850
Mouse Corsair Sabre Laser
Keyboard Logitech Orion Brown (G610)
#38
be prepared to destroy your PSU :p
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
6,592 (2.25/day)
Likes
5,826
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name New Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 1700X @ 3.82Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho & custom GPU loop
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) GTX1080ti (Heatkiller WB) @ 2Ghz core/1.5(12)Ghz mem
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) Dell Ultrasharp 27" (2560x1440)
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?
#39
So basically, Nvidia implemented a 2nd throttle at the software level to make power consumption level's of the GTX 580 look lower? that's what i'm getting out of this. Course, we need to wait and see what results other users of the GTX 580's get.
I read somewhere it's a software implementation just now, only for Furmark and OCCT. So it shouldn't be active with anything else. Did i read this right?
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2007
Messages
1,132 (0.31/day)
Likes
160
System Name Grandpa
Processor i5 4690K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97X-UD5H-BK
Cooling water
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengence 2400MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 5850 x2
Storage Samsung SM951
Display(s) Catleap 27"
Case coolermaster stacker
Power Supply corsair AX860i
Mouse logitech g5 original
Keyboard Ducky
Software Windows 8.1
#40
this should not affect temperature protection, which will remain at 97°C



it won't. just as much as any card other than gtx 580 does not have this kind of protection either
Is that temperature protection based on multiple sensors (GPU,VRM) or GPU only? If the power limiting is intended to protect the vrm rather than GPU, this mod may push users cards closer to failure than what they expect. If the protection is aimed at the GPU, then the temp limit will work ok.

As was advised, user beware is the relevant issue here.
 

HillBeast

New Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
407 (0.14/day)
Likes
27
Location
New Zealand
System Name Kuja
Processor Intel Core i7 930
Motherboard Gigabyte X58A-UD3R
Cooling Corsair H50 HB.o Special Edition with Koolance CHC-122 NB Block
Memory OCZ Extreme Edition 4GB Dual Channel
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon 5870 Vapor-X Rev. 2
Storage 2x 1TB WD Green in RAID
Display(s) BenQ V2400W
Case Lian Li PC-A17 HB.o Special Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek 889A
Power Supply Gigabyte Odin Pro 800W
Software Windows 7 Professional
Benchmark Scores 93632 sysPoints in sysTest '09 47 FPS in Star Tales Benchmark
#41
True, but no other previous cards have used as much power as the 480 & 580, which makes a burnout more likely.
What everyone fails to remember is that supercomputers (especially ones based on the more modern POWER chips (POWER6 and POWER7) have very powerful and very hot CPUs in them. They draw well over 300W each and those puppies are at full load for months and months on end. Yes they are designed to handle it, but if a card is designed correctly, it can easily handle being at full load.

This throttling system wasn't NVIDIA saying the cards can't go higher than what they rated them for, it's NVIDIA just trying to make the card look like it's not as high of a power hungry card.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
662 (0.21/day)
Likes
84
Location
I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
System Name 2 sys spec seperated by "|"
Processor R7 1700 | Xeon 2680
Motherboard Asus | HP Z620
Cooling Water | Air
Memory 64gb | 128 gb
Video Card(s) EK-FC - RX Vega 64 | quadro K4000\GTX970
Storage Many SSD's
Display(s) AOC 28" 4K something
Case Corsair Carbide 88R
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Mouse G500
Keyboard TT Meka G1
Software Ubuntu 17.10 - 4.14 AMDGPU
#42
What everyone fails to remember is that supercomputers (especially ones based on the more modern POWER chips (POWER6 and POWER7) have very powerful and very hot CPUs in them. They draw well over 300W each and those puppies are at full load for months and months on end. Yes they are designed to handle it, but if a card is designed correctly, it can easily handle being at full load.

This throttling system wasn't NVIDIA saying the cards can't go higher than what they rated them for, it's NVIDIA just trying to make the card look like it's not as high of a power hungry card.
my server board runs 130 W cpu's and has two phases each. no biggo coolin on the pwm either.
8 cpu board.

So your 16 phases.. do you need them ? i've taken world records on 4! average joe doesnt need so many phases, all that crap.
Motherboards can be cheap, the stock performance rarely differ, overclocking on the otherhand, you may require some expensiveness, and add cf and sli.

Back on topic, its funny tho.
350 W
ati manages to push a dualgpu card, with the lowered per/watt due to scaling, and having a double set of memory one of them doing nothing, and yet having better perf/watt.
I hope ati's engineers are getting a little bonus!
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,554 (3.97/day)
Likes
8,061
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#43
What everyone fails to remember is that supercomputers (especially ones based on the more modern POWER chips (POWER6 and POWER7) have very powerful and very hot CPUs in them. They draw well over 300W each and those puppies are at full load for months and months on end. Yes they are designed to handle it, but if a card is designed correctly, it can easily handle being at full load.

This throttling system wasn't NVIDIA saying the cards can't go higher than what they rated them for, it's NVIDIA just trying to make the card look like it's not as high of a power hungry card.
That would be nice if it's true, but I don't think nvidia would spend money implementing and building in a performance limiting feature (frame rate drops when it kicks in) just to put a certain idea in people's minds.

As W1zzard said to me earlier and you did just now, the card can consume any amount of power and run just fine with it, as long as the power circuitry and the rest is designed for it.

And that's the rub.

Everything is built to a price. While those POWER computers are priced to run flat out 24/7 (and believe me they really charge for this capability) a power-hungry consumer grade item, including the expensive GTX 580 is not. So, the card will only gobble huge amounts of power for any length of time when an enthusiast overclocks it and runs something like FurMark on it. Now, how many of us do you think there are to do this? Only a tiny handful. Heck, even out of the group of enthusiasts, only some of them will ever bother to do this. The rest of us (likely me included) are happy to read the articles about it and avoid unecessarily stressing out their expensive graphics cards. I've never overclocked my current GTX 285 for example. I did overclock my HD 2900 XT though.

The rest of the time, the card will be either sitting at the desktop (hardly taxing) or running a regular game at something like 1920x1080, which won't stress it anywhere near this amount. So nvidia are gonna build it to withstand this average stress reliably. Much more and reliability drops significantly.

The upshot, is that they're gonna save money on the quality of the motherboard used for the card, it's power components and all the other things that would take the strain when it's taxed at high power. This means that Mr Enthusiast over here at TPU is gonna kill his card rather more quickly than nvidia would like and generate lots of unprofitable RMAs. Hence, they just limit the performance and be done with it. Heck, it also helps to guard against the clueless wannabe enthusiast that doesn't know what he's doing and maxes the card out in a hot, unventilated case. ;)

Of course, now that there's a workaround, some enthusiasts are gonna use it...

And dammit, all this talk of GTX 580s is really making me want one!! :)
 

lism

New Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
138 (0.04/day)
Likes
10
#44
So basicly the card is capped at a certain level of power usage, but will it increase performance in furmark as soon as this trigger is being set off?

Or is just just abnormal power usage by the VRM's to protect them from burning out ? A few GTX's where also reported with fried VRM's using Furmark.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,554 (3.97/day)
Likes
8,061
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#45
So basicly the card is capped at a certain level of power usage, but will it increase performance in furmark as soon as this trigger is being set off?

Or is just just abnormal power usage by the VRM's to protect them from burning out ? A few GTX's where also reported with fried VRM's using Furmark.
Performance will increase noticeably as soon as the cap is removed.

EDIT: You might also want to read my post, the one before yours that explains why this kind of limiter is being put in.
 
Last edited:

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (5.94/day)
Likes
3,682
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
#46
That would be nice if it's true, but I don't think nvidia would spend money implementing and building in a performance limiting feature (frame rate drops when it kicks in) just to put a certain idea in people's minds.

As W1zzard said to me earlier and you did just now, the card can consume any amount of power and run just fine with it, as long as the power circuitry and the rest is designed for it.

And that's the rub.

Everything is built to a price. While those POWER computers are priced to run flat out 24/7 (and believe me they really charge for this capability) a power-hungry consumer grade item, including the expensive GTX 580 is not. So, the card will only gobble huge amounts of power for any length of time when an enthusiast overclocks it and runs something like FurMark on it. Now, how many of us do you think there are to do this? Only a tiny handful. Heck, even out of the group of enthusiasts, only some of them will ever bother to do this. The rest of us (likely me included) are happy to read the articles about it and avoid unecessarily stressing out their expensive graphics cards. I've never overclocked my current GTX 285 for example. I did overclock my HD 2900 XT though.

The rest of the time, the card will be either sitting at the desktop (hardly taxing) or running a regular game at something like 1920x1080, which won't stress it anywhere near this amount. So nvidia are gonna build it to withstand this average stress reliably. Much more and reliability drops significantly.

The upshot, is that they're gonna save money on the quality of the motherboard used for the card, it's power components and all the other things that would take the strain when it's taxed at high power. This means that Mr Enthusiast over here at TPU is gonna kill his card rather more quickly than nvidia would like and generate lots of unprofitable RMAs. Hence, they just limit the performance and be done with it. Heck, it also helps to guard against the clueless wannabe enthusiast that doesn't know what he's doing and maxes the card out in a hot, unventilated case. ;)

Of course, now that there's a workaround, some enthusiasts are gonna use it...

And dammit, all this talk of GTX 580s is really making me want one!! :)
I don't think the limit is there to protect the card. I think it is there to make power consumption numbers look better, and to allow them to continue to claim compliance with PCI-SIG specs for PCIe power delivery.
 

HillBeast

New Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
407 (0.14/day)
Likes
27
Location
New Zealand
System Name Kuja
Processor Intel Core i7 930
Motherboard Gigabyte X58A-UD3R
Cooling Corsair H50 HB.o Special Edition with Koolance CHC-122 NB Block
Memory OCZ Extreme Edition 4GB Dual Channel
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon 5870 Vapor-X Rev. 2
Storage 2x 1TB WD Green in RAID
Display(s) BenQ V2400W
Case Lian Li PC-A17 HB.o Special Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek 889A
Power Supply Gigabyte Odin Pro 800W
Software Windows 7 Professional
Benchmark Scores 93632 sysPoints in sysTest '09 47 FPS in Star Tales Benchmark
#47
my server board runs 130 W cpu's and has two phases each. no biggo coolin on the pwm either.
8 cpu board.

So your 16 phases.. do you need them ? i've taken world records on 4! average joe doesnt need so many phases, all that crap.
Motherboards can be cheap, the stock performance rarely differ, overclocking on the otherhand, you may require some expensiveness, and add cf and sli.
What on earth are you on about with 16 power phases for? I was talking about POWER7: the IBM PowerPC CPU used in supercomputers. Those are VERY power hungry chips. Your 130W server chip wouldn't compare to the performance these things provide and power these things need. Why did you quote me for when you weren't even remotely talking on the same topic as me?

And I don't have 16 power phases on my motherboard if that is what you were referring to. Power phases mean nothing. It's how they are implemented. My Gigabyte X58A-UD3R with 8 analog power phases can overclock HIGHER than my friends EVGA X58 Classified with 10 digital power phases.

I don't think the limit is there to protect the card. I think it is there to make power consumption numbers look better, and to allow them to continue to claim compliance with PCI-SIG specs for PCIe power delivery.
Exactly.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,554 (3.97/day)
Likes
8,061
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#48
I don't think the limit is there to protect the card. I think it is there to make power consumption numbers look better, and to allow them to continue to claim compliance with PCI-SIG specs for PCIe power delivery.
Hmmm... the compliance angle sounds quite plausible. Does anyone have inside info on why nvidia implemented this throttle?

The built to a price argument still stands though.
 

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (5.94/day)
Likes
3,682
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
#49
Hmmm... the compliance angle sounds quite plausible. Does anyone have inside info on why nvidia implemented this throttle?

The built to a price argument still stands though.
Not really, because the boards and power phases are more than enough to support the power draw of the unlocked cards. We already know what the components are capable of, and they are more than enough for 350W of draw.

If anything, adding throttling has added to the price of the needed components.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,283 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,383
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) PNY XLR8 GTX1060 6GB
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#50
What amazes me is how many people think this is some major limitter that will hinder performance or kick in when the card goes over a certainly current level.

It is software based, it detects OCCT and Furmark and that is it. It will not effect any other program at all. Anyone remember ATi doing this with their drivers so that Furmark wouldn't burn up their cards?


True, but no other previous cards have used as much power as the 480 & 580, which makes a burnout more likely.
Ummmm...there most certainly has been.

I don't think the limit is there to protect the card. I think it is there to make power consumption numbers look better, and to allow them to continue to claim compliance with PCI-SIG specs for PCIe power delivery.
I really have a hard time believing that they did it to make power consumption look better. Any reviewer right away should pick up on the fact that under normal gaming load the card is consuming ~225w and under Furmark it is only consuming ~150w. Right there it should throw up a red flag, because Furmark consumption should never be drastically lower, or lower at all, than normal gaming numbers. Plus the performance different in Furmark would be pretty evident to a reviewer that sees Furmark performance numbers daily. Finally, with the limitter turned off the power consumption is still lower, and for a Fermi card that is within 5% of the HD5970 to have pretty much the same power consumption, that is an impressive feat that doesn't need to be artificially enhanced.
 
Last edited: