• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

How to use a Nvidia card as Physx w/ATi

there is NO virus in this RAR file. I would never put TPU at risk of a virus by my uploads. i just ran this file under three types of anti-virus (norton, kaspersky, and AVG) NONE came up with anything let alone a false positive. Unless megaupload has added there own virus to it, it was perfectly clean when i uploaded it

don't worry ;)
it's panda being an asshat it won't let me download either it says the same shix :ohwell:
hey you don't think nvidia's got to them :eek::laugh:
actually now i think of it panda went through my drive the other day and deleted some of my phone software saying that was a trojan :mad: probably because i've got the heuristic scan activated
 
ok not clear as to why the 250 would not work. doesnt it have 112 shaders? or maybe iam not gettin git lol man Iam in so much pain i shouldnt be sittin on here lol or would a 9800gt still be best and if so for what reasons thanx all
 
did you try my new link i made for mail man?

yes sorry it's panda being a d censored.gif,
no worries i'm switching to kaspersky as soon as i make my mind up what i7 mobo i'm getting:D
 
ok not clear as to why the 250 would not work. doesnt it have 112 shaders? or maybe iam not gettin git lol man Iam in so much pain i shouldnt be sittin on here lol or would a 9800gt still be best and if so for what reasons thanx all

From what I understand a 250 would be perfect for a Phsx card. Im looking at the one I posted above. I just have no idea about galaxy cards.
 
My 250 failed as a PPU, of course it was in with dual 280's but my scores went down using it as a dedicated PPU versus letting the 280's do their thing.
 
My 250 failed as a PPU, of course it was in with dual 280's but my scores went down using it as a dedicated PPU versus letting the 280's do their thing.

why do you think that was?
 
no idea, I had it set up correctly, everything read it as operational. Guess the 280's were just that much more powerful that to offload it to a lesser card was detrimental to the overall score.
 
HHMM ya never know! or I was kinda looking at thinc card,
PNY XLR8 VCG98GTEE1XEB GeForce 9800 GT 1GB 256-bit GDDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Support Video Card
anyways guys Iam outa here cant stand the damn pain anymore, going to take an oxy and lay down Ill check in later as this realy interests me and it helps take my mind of this Take care
 
My 250 failed as a PPU, of course it was in with dual 280's but my scores went down using it as a dedicated PPU versus letting the 280's do their thing.

why do you think that was?

Honestly that makes sense. The 250 was a bottleneck for them 280's. But remember we ATI users have no Physx capability in our main card. A 250 wouldn't be a bottleneck for us......I think? :laugh:
 
I wouldn't assume so, thats why I included that I was running them with the 280's.
 
Well Ill have to take the plunge. How much money do I want to gamble on cracked drivers.....
 
mail man. if i was you i would try to find a used 9600GT instead of buying a NEW card due to the low list of games that even use physx
 
This is great! I just bought a 9600GT just for this purpose. :toast:
 
i couldn't get it to work without needing a monitor enabled , so the mouse moves offscreen gaming.

there was a video about how to bypass it, but i tried many times and no go.
 
when i did the fix, i went back to screen resolution and moved the small monitor to the left of the main screen and that fixed some issues for me
 
I only have one monitor. Would this affect me?
 
i only have one monitor as well. it doesnt affect anything. if you take you mouse far enough it will go out of screen but since i moved it to the left side of my main screen it doesnt bother me.
 
my mobo hax a x16 and a x8 pcie slot, will the GTS 250 work in the x8 slot? and the ATI in the x16
 
Back
Top