@95Viper, I vote this thread is locked. There is no good discussion that come of it anymore. No one has the answer, and no one will get one. I don't see any good of leaving it up anymore. 20 pages (without deletions) is enough.
I see all the sad faces. My job is to break licenses for a living. In order to do so, I have to sign contracts saying I will only break licenses in ways they deem fit in my rules of engagement. Why is that important: Companies put licenses on things because they mean it.
They may choose not to pursue but that is detrimental to them as it starts to set a precedent that they don't care. Is it legal? Who knows? But if I was a company, and I put licenses on things, you can't let some people break it and others not. Because, as a sane (sometimes) individual, if I am a juror, and I see 4 cases where the company ignored its license, I am not going to grant them the ability to punish the fifth person. They lost that ability.
The other reason this should be close: it has been 18 pages of shitting on Aquinus for doing his duty bound to the license he is part of. He was also looking out for TPU by bringing it to their attention before Nvidia finds out in a way that makes them less happy.
If we have gone 18 pages and can't get over the fact that Aquinus was doing what he signed up for, and thinks he is trying to sink TPU, then what are we going to get out of another 18 pages?
