• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

PhysX FluidMark results thread

Here's mine :P

Intel Core2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2 GHz , XFX 8800GT 512 MB 670/1675/1900

Score : 8050
 

Attachments

  • fluidmark.PNG
    fluidmark.PNG
    41.3 KB · Views: 547
Geez. I thought for sure somebody would've dethroned me by now.
 
I must've had a lucky break on my 8.3k runs...I can't get above 8155 anymore lol! Yet! :D
 
I'm gunnin' for ya Wile E! Here's my first run: 11655
C2D E8400 @ 4.10ghz on h2o/P5Q Pro MoBo
2 X EVGA 8800GS 512mb @ 745/1847/935(2nd 8800GS is running the Physx processing).
PS...I'm having problems with CPU-Z right now. I have Coretemp to show core speed

fluidmarkscreenshotzq5.png
 
Last edited:
Just so you are aware, I'm still sandbagging. lol :D
 
Just so you are aware, I'm still sandbagging. lol :D
In that case(takes off gloves), I may have to swap my 8800GTS in place of my primary 8800GS. Looks like I might have to make a record run on the E8400....;)
 
Looks like it's on! I may have to get XP loaded up and see if my GTX can even stand up to you guys lol! Probably not tho! :D

Looking forward to PhysX Fluidmark TPU Battle-Royale!
 
Looks like it's on! I may have to get XP loaded up and see if my GTX can even stand up to you guys lol! Probably not tho! :D

Looking forward to PhysX Fluidmark TPU Battle-Royale!
Oh, this is gonna be good...:pimp:
 
13052
C2D E8400 @ 4.095ghz
MSI 8800GTS G92 @795/1999/1002
And to think, i'm just gettin started...:pimp:

casepic006rv3.jpg

Sorry for the photo, but screenies are problematic with my dual card set-up
 
13052
C2D E8400 @ 4.095ghz
MSI 8800GTS G92 @795/1999/1002
And to think, i'm just gettin started...:pimp:

casepic006rv3.jpg

Sorry for the photo, but screenies are problematic with my dual card set-up

nice score actually for a older card.
 
13052
C2D E8400 @ 4.095ghz
MSI 8800GTS G92 @795/1999/1002
And to think, i'm just gettin started...:pimp:


Sorry for the photo, but screenies are problematic with my dual card set-up

Nice score man, I'd be interested to see what you get in vista, so I can see how much my 6750 is holding back my score. There seem to be a number of factors in this bench, w/ gpu only offering a portion of the equation.
 
13052
C2D E8400 @ 4.095ghz
MSI 8800GTS G92 @795/1999/1002
And to think, i'm just gettin started...:pimp:

http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/854/casepic006rv3.jpg
Sorry for the photo, but screenies are problematic with my dual card set-up

Very, VERY nice score. I didn't expect someone to beat me by breaking straight into the 13k's.

But to that, I offer this retort. :D

13420
Core 2 Extreme QX9650 @ 4.455Ghz
Palit 8800GT 1GB @ 925/2312/925
Physx.png


But seriously, I expect you to win. My card is close to tapped out. I wish my best clocker wouldn't have died. At best I have a few more Mhz to squeeze out of it, and probably some driver tweaks.
 
Very, VERY nice score. I didn't expect someone to beat me by breaking straight into the 13k's.

But to that, I offer this retort. :D

13420
Core 2 Extreme QX9650 @ 4.455Ghz
Palit 8800GT 1GB @ 925/2312/925
http://img.techpowerup.org/080821/Physx.png

But seriously, I expect you to win. My card is close to tapped out. I wish my best clocker wouldn't have died. At best I have a few more Mhz to squeeze out of it, and probably some driver tweaks.
Let me start by saying very nice OC on the QX. Although it was not my intention to "drop the hammer":p, a slight 100mhz increase on the E8400 yeilded the following:
16533
C2D E8400 @ 4.202Gghz/MSI 8800GTS G92 512mb
I regret that I must retire from this round of benchmarking, as I have just rec'd 2 more 9600GSO's to fold with and they must go in this rig. It's has been fun and let me know if another round is necessary.
P.S. Everyone that submitted scores in this thread has the ability to Fold for TPU with their Nvidia GPU. The F@H GPU2 client scales nicely and you can play games/surf/anything else while folding for a great cause as well as representing TPU. Please give it a try and check out the link.:toast: http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=13038

fluidmark 16533.jpg
 
Wow BUCK you got double my score! That's insanity! :toast:
 
Let me start by saying very nice OC on the QX. Although it was not my intention to "drop the hammer":p, a slight 100mhz increase on the E8400 yeilded the following:
16533
C2D E8400 @ 4.202Gghz/MSI 8800GTS G92 512mb
I regret that I must retire from this round of benchmarking, as I have just rec'd 2 more 9600GSO's to fold with and they must go in this rig. It's has been fun and let me know if another round is necessary.
P.S. Everyone that submitted scores in this thread has the ability to Fold for TPU with their Nvidia GPU. The F@H GPU2 client scales nicely and you can play games/surf/anything else while folding for a great cause as well as representing TPU. Please give it a try and check out the link.:toast: http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=13038

http://img.techpowerup.org/080821/fluidmark 16533.jpg
Judging by this post, I think you won the war. lol.

But that does lead me to wonder, are the extra 16 shaders actually enough to make up for an almost 125Mhz core advantage, or might there be an issue with my setup?
 
I almost wish I had a nice NVidia card to match up with my QX and see what I could get at this bench, but seeing what scores you got in XP and Vista Wile E, I really need to get my system dual booting see if I can get any better scores with my QX and the ATI cards.
 
Judging by this post, I think you won the war. lol.

But that does lead me to wonder, are the extra 16 shaders actually enough to make up for an almost 125Mhz core advantage, or might there be an issue with my setup?

No those shaders have little to do w/ it. Buck what did you change between the first and second run? Looks like you may have upped the shaders, but maybe not (due to the way they clock), the other clocks are lower, a slightly higher cpu speed, and 3k more? :confused: Driver tweaks? My gts 512 is clocked a large amount further than that one, yet I can only achieve half the score. For some reason vista and cpu core speed seem to actually be the largest factor in this bench atm, I'm wondering if this is truly representative of physX........
 
i'll post mine as soon as i get a mobo that works lol
 
Judging by this post, I think you won the war. lol.

But that does lead me to wonder, are the extra 16 shaders actually enough to make up for an almost 125Mhz core advantage, or might there be an issue with my setup?
the only thing I noticed was the 13k run the card was at X8 pci-e 2.0 also idk if XP sp2 vs 3 would be that big

cuz you can uninstall sp3 right ?
 
1st run was 2x 8800gs with pci-e @ x8. 2nd run was 1x 8800GTS @ x16 pci-e. No driver changes between runs. It's not a fluke, as i made the run three times and posted my best run. All runs were within 100pts of each other. The GPU has not topped out yet, but it is in another case folding right now. In the next week I may give it another run. We will see what it can do....
 
BUCK could you run i few tests with the same configuration as you topscore-config but with different CPU clocks so we could see how much difference the CPU makes? PLZ
 
BUCK could you run i few tests with the same configuration as you topscore-config but with different CPU clocks so we could see how much difference the CPU makes? PLZ
Yes, give me the criteria you want the test runs completed with.
Keep in mind it may not be until later this week...
 
This is a new one on me, a might give this a run, back in a bit!
 
Wow, there's some awesome scores showing up now!

This is with my 24/7 config. No record braker, but thought it was quite respectable for an old G80 card!

Score: 8773

C2D e6400 @ 3.5ghz (500x7)
2gb @ 1200mhz 5-5-5-12
8800GTS 640mb (G80)

Capture012.png
 
i'm going to try this with a G92 8800GTS and a 8400GS for physics :D
 
Back
Top