• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Post your CrystalDiskMark speeds

This is on my i5-11320 mini-me box with 32GB ram... not the absolute fastest out there, but still respectable IMHO :D

CrystalDiskMark_6-18-23.png
 
Windows Disk Management 980 Pro 2TB x2 in RAID Zero on x470 (PCIe 3.0) ASUS Hyper M.2 X16

1688934571116.png
 
Sabrent 4 Pro 1TB

CrystalDiskMark_sab4 pro.png


Samsung 980 Pro 1TB

CrystalDiskMark_S980.png



Samsung 990 Pro 2TB

CrystalDiskMark_9901.png


Samsung 990 Pro 2TB

CrystalDiskMark_S9902.png
 
here from my 2 laptops , (lenovo p1 g3) the first is pcie-3 samsung 980 pro SSD , the second graph from my precision 5570 i7 seagte firecude 530 2tb
in a raid 0 , stripe is set to 64kb ( RND4K seems low compare to other graphs, should i setup the raid 0 with a lower/higher stripe ??
suggestions please :)
windows 11

under windows 10 the read and write is much lower ( 6700 - 5000 ) but the rdnk q32 is higher
 

Attachments

  • lenovo_p1.jpg
    lenovo_p1.jpg
    101.8 KB · Views: 112
  • precision_5570.jpg
    precision_5570.jpg
    116.9 KB · Views: 109
Last edited:
kriszty said:
here from my 2 laptops , (lenovo p1 g3) the first is pcie-3 samsung 980 pro SSD , the second graph from my precision 5570 i7 seagte firecude 530 2tb
in a raid 0 , stripe is set to 64kb ( RND4K seems low compare to other graphs, should i setup the raid 0 with a lower/higher stripe ??
suggestions please :)
windows 11

under windows 10 the read and write is much lower ( 6700 - 5000 ) but the rdnk q32 is higher
Click to expand...
changed from 64kb to default 128kb stripe, and installed the newest rst files, now it seems a lot better
disk2.png
 
68Olds said:
Conner, that's a name I haven't seen in a long time. I had a few of them on the shelf, but I can't remember if they are still there or not. :confused:
Click to expand...
Synonymous with a 1990s PC! Like the 486 that I got used in the very-late-1990s, which came with a Conner 240 MiB HDD!
 
My first time running Gen4 drives @ Gen4 bandwidth :D

1.PNG

2.PNG

3.PNG
 
Benchies in CDM with my 3 drives (including the new Lexar 790NM)

disk benchmarks 21.8.23.jpg


UPDATE: Here's the scores with settings at NVMe SSD

CDM 980 PRO 2TB-M2.jpg
CDM 980 PRO 1TB-M2.jpg
CDM Lexar nm790-M2.jpg
 
Last edited:
CrystalDiskMark > Settings > NVMe SSD
Not Default
 
Here is the result of two Samsung 990 PRO Series - 2TB PCIe Gen4. X4 NVMe 2.0c in RAID 0
By the way is it worth to do Raid 0 for gaming purposes?
 

Attachments

  • CrystalDiskMark_20231005111122.png
    CrystalDiskMark_20231005111122.png
    33.4 KB · Views: 86
ellwood said:
Here is the result of two Samsung 990 PRO Series - 2TB PCIe Gen4. X4 NVMe 2.0c in RAID 0
By the way is it worth to do Raid 0 for gaming purposes?
Click to expand...
I have a raid 0 with Sata drives for my games only because I want a single pool of storage for them and don't want it spread across multiple drives.

You will not see any benefit in games from Raid 0 when it comes to performance.
 
Makaveli said:
I have a raid 0 with Sata drives for my games only because I want a single pool of storage for them and don't want it spread across multiple drives.

You will not see any benefit in games from Raid 0 when it comes to performance.
Click to expand...
I am understand that it will not give any performances benefits. I am mostly interested in loading speed
 
CDM.png


SATA HDD

The idea is to have some fun with this PC, and maybe buy 2 identical SSD's to build a RAID 0 config
 
ellwood said:
I am understand that it will not give any performances benefits. I am mostly interested in loading speed
Click to expand...
loading speed would be a performance benefit and I don't see any in single drive vs Raid 0 in games.
 
My WD Black SN850X 1TB
Is a good result
 

Attachments

  • WD Black SN850X3.png
    WD Black SN850X3.png
    61.8 KB · Views: 90
Optane 900p 480GB
 

Attachments

  • CrystalDiskMark_20231029091409.png
    CrystalDiskMark_20231029091409.png
    26.8 KB · Views: 101
1698575163239.png


1698575471322.png


1698575802869.png
 
SSD's.png
 
Naamloos.png
 
Hi,
Dusted off my apex dimm2 slot 970 evo plus after nearly 2+- years back in the box and finally got win-11 22h2 on it

So which do you believe CDM or hwinfo64 littlew m.2 cooler fan moving hehe:fear:
1699918749992.png
 
Any suggestions for a better free ramdik?
1699959049159.png


Samsung 990 pro 1TB
1699960450594.png
 
Last edited:
ThrashZone said:
Hi,
Dusted off my apex dimm2 slot 970 evo plus after nearly 2+- years back in the box and finally got win-11 22h2 on it

So which do you believe CDM or hwinfo64 littlew m.2 cooler fan moving hehe:fear:
View attachment 321481
Click to expand...
Oops that was my regular 970 evo not the evo plus :o
Was also reading the wrong read/ write table on hwinfo
Never knew setting need to be switched for m.2s either :banghead:

1700088918377.png
 
Here it is

1700258016483.png
 
Hi,
New lappy all and all not bad just a bit bloated still
Acer nitro 17 7840HS 16gb 5600 ddr5 with a 4060
Might leave the stock m.2 it's not to bad just needs a heatsink also bought another sn850x 2tb for it but may return it :/
SN850x 4tb absollutely needs one :fear:
Have to checkout how it does with normal usage with movies/... no games installed yet just data.

Acer stock m.2-N-sn850x 4tb.PNG
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top