Post your gpu's ASIC quality

[NdMk2o1o]

Meh, my XFX 7950 has a meagre 61.5% ASIC score though runs cool and overclocks almost as well as my last Vapor X 7950 which had a really good score of about 85%

 

[BiggieShady]

My ASIC is 84.6%
Not oc-ing, plenty fast and loud as is

 

[Jetster]

Mine is like 58%

 

[remixedcat]

 

[erocker]

Card is stable, under water. 1.25v set in Trixx.

 

[BarbaricSoul]

my asic is higher than yours and I couldn't even get to 1030 on core without crashing on Metro LL though it was 3dmark11 stable and runs fine on Crysis 3 and FC3. Is that XFX of yours the one with a 7970 pcb?

It's actually one of the first 7970 Core Edition models released by XFX.

 

[jihadjoe]

Here's mine 94%

http://img.techpowerup.org/130816/asic445.jpg

I'm assuming higher % is better.

That's pretty awesome! How high does it OC?

 

[Durvelle27]

XFX HD 7970

 

[Deleted member 24505]

That's pretty awesome! How high does it OC?

Not really tried to crank it max, I've not really got any experience with Nvidia cards or afterburner.

If anyone fancy's giving me a hand, I will see what it can do.

What is a safe voltage to set so I can give it a blast? The cooler is pretty good.

I had it at 950/2200 with voltage at .975<this right with the .?

I think that is stock voltage but I'm not sure.

 

[Deleted member 24505]

Hows this?

Not a dubble post, wanted to bump it up if that's ok.

 

[welly31]

ASIC quality IS NOT how well a card overclocks. Its more about how much leakage there is and how effectively it utilizes its voltage. Indirectly ASIC quality could effect overclockability but just because a card has high ASIC does not mean it will clock higher than a card with lower ASIC.

 

[Deleted member 6693]

GTX 670 DirectCU II

 

[fullinfusion]

ASIC quality IS NOT how well a card overclocks. Its more about how much leakage there is and how effectively it utilizes its voltage. Indirectly ASIC quality could effect overclockability but just because a card has high ASIC does not mean it will clock higher than a card with lower ASIC.

Ok I get ya but... explain to me why one of my cards cant handle 1200MHz @ stock volts ,and the other one can without any problems. the worse clocker is 65.7 and the better one is 73.4////

 

[erocker]

Ok I get ya but... explain to me why one of my cards cant handle 1200MHz @ stock volts ,and the other one can without any problems. the worse clocker is 65.7 and the better one is 73.4////

Same for me!

 

[radrok]

Same for me!

Thirded!

The lower ASIC one clocks worse, even on water.

 

[fullinfusion]

Card is stable, under water. 1.25v set in Trixx.

http://img.techpowerup.org/130816/valleyscrn.jpg

That's it? Common Erocker even my shitty card does 1800Mhz on the memory..

*pokes with a stick*

 

[shovenose]

Sparkle Calibre GTX 670 2GB - 83.5%

 

[radrok]

That's it? Common Erocker even my shitty card does 1800Mhz on the memory..

*pokes with a stick*

I found that Valley runs higher clocks stable than some games.

Like Skyrim/Crysis3 and MetroLL completely trash on my Valley stable clocks.

 

[Roph]

Seems like a respectable overclock from a 7770. XFX Core edition.

 

[Deleted member 24505]

whether ASIC makes a difference or not, I'm surprised there are no more as high as my 94%.

 

[basco]

hey tigger ya know that your 560ti has a hawk 460 pcb underneath?
so you can push her - she can take it.

here we had some fun long ago with this beast with only 1,212volt max.
sorry is german
http://www.overclockers.at/extreme_cooling/oanvoancbasco-quaelen-eine-msi-560tfiihawk_226345

 

[Deleted member 24505]

hey tigger ya know that your 560ti has a hawk 460 pcb underneath?
so you can push her - she can take it.

here we had some fun long ago with this beast with only 1,212volt max.
sorry is german
http://www.overclockers.at/extreme_cooling/oanvoancbasco-quaelen-eine-msi-560tfiihawk_226345

Nice, how much volts will it take with the stock cooler? it does have a heatsink on the vregs too. max I have pushed it is 1k with 1.0volts, i don't know how far to go on the volts. Don't want to kill it

Thanks

 

[basco]

i put on the msi 560ti hawk bios with 1,21volt max.mine came without the vrm cooler.
i think with norm bios is 1,15volt.
if the temp does not exceed 80° to 90° with full load your good to go.
you have to feel comfortable with temps then volt is not the problem.

you can always look for spezifikation:max temp 99°
http://www.geforce.co.uk/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-560ti/specifications

 

[Deleted member 24505]

i put on the msi 560ti hawk bios with 1,21volt max.mine came without the vrm cooler.
i think with norm bios is 1,15volt.
if the temp does not exceed 80° to 90° with full load your good to go.
you have to feel comfortable with temps then volt is not the problem.

you can always look for spezifikation:max temp 99°
http://www.geforce.co.uk/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-560ti/specifications

Max volts on mine is 1.15v, The cooler is pretty good, most I've seen is about 75c ish.

Will the 560ti hawk bios be ok on mine? I'll see if it's in the TPU bios collection.

You got a link to the hawk bios?

 

[BarbaricSoul]

Ok I get ya but... explain to me why one of my cards cant handle 1200MHz @ stock volts ,and the other one can without any problems. the worse clocker is 65.7 and the better one is 73.4////

Same for me!

Thirded!

The lower ASIC one clocks worse, even on water.

yet my 7970 has one of the highest ASIC ratings in this thread, but it won't do anything close to what Erocker's can do. Best I've gotten out of it using MSI Afterburner is 1090/1400. Using Trixx, I have gotten 1150/1425. But nothing close to the 1300 MHz Erocker can do on his core.