Processor GFlops Compilation

JrRacinFan | Intel | i3 530 @ 4.4Ghz | 028.2245 | 06.4147 | 64-bit | HT On - 4 Threads/5 Iterations

 

Table Updated.

Crap, I really slacked off letting those last two slip by my thread update radar!

 

Add me

Here's mine

Raovac | AMD Phenom II 1090T @ 4.030Ghz | 076.4836 | 18.9785 | 64-bit |

 

add me

Frick | AMD | AMD Athlon II x3 445 @ 3.1 Ghz| 013,634 | 04,38 | 32 bit

 

Table Updated.

 

mm67 | Intel | Pentium Dual Core E6500 @ 4000MHz | 25.33815 | 6.33454 | 64-bit

 

MoonPig | AMD | Phenom II 1055T @ 2.8GHz | 54.34155 | 19.34344 | 64-bit

http://img.techpowerup.org/101001/Untitled412.jpg

Real cores beat pretend cores

 

Add Me

Athlonite | AMD | Phenom II x4 940 @ 3 GHz | 039.0858 | 013.0286 | 64-bit





now that i have an Quad core cpu

I'm still a little confuzzled when it come to working out the Gflops per GHz
as the above works out to be 3000 / 39.0858 = 76.754 which to me doesn't sound right even if i divide that by 4 for an per core score 76.754 / 4 = 19.1885 still sounds high when looking at the table for others with x4 940 CPU's

 

Table updated.

Gflops per GHz is simply figured by GFLOPs/GHz.

So it would be 39.0858 / 3 = 13.0286

 

crunchie | AMD | 1090T @ 4144Mhz | 078.3538 | 18.907 | 64-bit |

 

Cheers I get it now what i was doin would have been fine for flops per MHz

 

DOM|Intel|i7 980X@4.4GHz|87.1836|19.8145|64-bit| testing new ram

 

Table Updated.

 

Thats an good OC there DOM

 

thanks
i could oc it more

 

2DividedbyZero|Intel|i7 980X@4.4GHz|91.3266|20.7560|64-bit|

I have more oc room but 24/7 clocks =

 

your missing cpu-z

 

add me

f**k forgot to add CPU-Z, another run =


2DividedbyZero|Intel|i7 980X@4.41GHz|91.65516|20.7834|64-bit|



damn that first result to hell 89...pssssshh

 

there's a wee bit of difference between you and Dom 2devidedbyzero maybe the bus speed difference could be it Dom's 133MHz and yours is 200MHz but with an lower multi of 22 vs doms 33

 

yeah thats probably the difference but also i did notice with DOMs settings...



that ratio is incorrect is it not? maybe this is cutting some bandwidth from him.

after my own testing i found 1600MHz with tighter settings and higher uncore better than 2000MHz mem look here OK, need some tried and tested memory o/c figures

 

DOM|Intel|i7 980X@4.8GHz|95.1979|19.8329|64-bit|

 

that's a fair improvement from your last OC DOM I see you went with higher FSB and lower multi

 

Once again I've been caught slacking.

Table Updated.

 

Add Me

Dalamar | Intel | i7 2600k @ 3.4ghz | 049.4551 | 14.9861 | 64 bit

 

Fatal | Intel | I7 950 @4.0 | 57.022325 | 15.67625 | 64-bit |