• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Processor GFlops Compilation

renq | AMD | Celeron G530 @ 2,4GHz | 016.862375 | 007.02598958(3) | Win 8 x64 RTM

Intel. I haven't saw an "AMD Celeron" yet :)

Besides, same CPU as mine ;)

BTW the table was last updated on January lol I think it won't be updated anymore.
 
Last edited:
All modern AMD processors DRAM speed is based off of the NB frequency. I know this because I used to have the same exact processor as you. Also HT isn't locked to the NB speed, they can (obviously) run independently. :confused:

I'm calling shenanigans.

It is on my Asus M3A32MVP-Deluxe to a point

FSB = 200MHz
NB = 12x200MHz (2400Mhz) 4x min to 22x max (800MHz to 4400MHz)
HT = maximum is equal to NB multiplier so 2400MHz
Dram Speed = 1066MHz / 5.33 = 200Mhz (DDR2-1066MHz) neither the NB or HT effect this setting playing with the FSB however does any increase in FSB consequently effects the Dram speed if I change FSB to say 215MHz the Dram speed now becomes 1145.54MHz however if I change the NB or HT speeds the Dram speed will remain the same only the throughput will be effected ie: NB>Dram write-Dram>NB read

the HT multiplier can not go higher than the NB it can go lower however (down to 800MHz) but it will not exceed the 12x multi on the NB unless I set the NB multiplier higher (Which I have done (upto 2600MHz) but it becomes unstable)
 
Last edited:
Add Me


Steevo | AMD | AMD A8-3500M | 016.3412 | 010.8941 | 64-bit Win 7 | Not dual channel RAM, 1.5Ghz fully loaded, 3.0Ghz single thread

Burn.jpg
 
add-me

cdawall | AMD | Phenom II B97 @4ghz | 051.7593 | 12.9398 | 64-bit | Loose timings 24/7 clocks

Capture038.jpg


cdawall | AMD | Phenom II B97 @4160mhz | 053.5078 | 12.8614 | 64-bit | peak clocks on H70

Capture039.jpg
 
Last edited:
Morgothl | Intel| Intel Xeon E5520 x2 @ 2,395mhz| 049.8213 | 17.942 | 64-bit |
test123123.png
 
FX-8320, Seronx

Seronx | AMD | FX-8320 3.8 GHz/4.3 GHz | 67.071825 | 16.56094 | 64-bit | Modded Libraries(Within Spec)

tpugflops.png
 
@seronx

Is CPU-Z misreading the memory frequency, or are you running it that slowly?
 
@seronx

Is CPU-Z misreading the memory frequency, or are you running it that slowly?
XMP-1866, it is bugging out.
tpugflops2.png


X-boost doesn't overclock that much does it...

X-Boost = Glitched out CPU-Z.
 
Last edited:
3930K@5GHz should score about 200GFLOPS with AVX support. This is just rubbish.
 
Aquinus | Intel | i7 3820 @ 4.267Ghz | 90.47594| 21.2 | 64-bit | No AVX
ibt.jpg
 
Add me

Capture336.png

Capture337.png


lemonadesoda| Intel| 2x Xeon E5472 @ 3.00 Ghz | 069.5090 | 23.170 | 32-bit |
 
Add Me

Moro | Intel | i7 3930K @ 4.4GHz | 173.3296 | 039.3930 | 64-bit | AVX, HT disabled

screenshot.png
 
Add me

omegatotal | Intel | Q6600 Gzero @ 3.6Ghz | 046.2422 | 012.8450 | 64-bit | 24/7 8x450 1.425 Vcore actual


OoWOLp7h.jpg


non-lapped CPU and H100, 2x Delta AFC1212DE-PWM on custom wire harness controlled by H100 pushing


IBT Gflops with normal work load active in background.

Still working out the voltages when I have hours to burn, but it is stable and does my streaming/transcoding from raw HBR 1080p/3d movies that I own.
 
Last edited:
Something isn't right with mine, at 3.24 GHz on 24 threads (Xeon E5645s) I only get about 100 GFLOPS, or not much more than half of what a Core i7-3960X does at 4.4 GHz?
 
omegatotal || Intel || Q6600 Gzero @ 3.6Ghz 8x450 || 046.2422 GFlops || 012.8450 GFlops Per GHz || 64-bit || 24/7 1.425 Vcore actual, non-lapped CPU and H100, 2x Delta AFC1212DE-PWM on custom wire harness controlled by H100 pushing


http://i.imgur.com/OoWOLp7h.jpg


IBT Gflops with normal work load active in background.

Still working out the voltages when I have hours to burn, but it is stable and does my streaming/transcoding from raw HBR 1080p/3d movies that I own.

Formating is wrong. Fix it or newtekie won't add your result. It should be:

omegatotal | Intel | Q6600 @ 3.6Ghz | 046.2422 | 012.8450 | 64-bit | 8x450 24/7 1.425 Vcore

The extra |s and the large comment will break the table formatting. If you want to add details of your rig do so in the post.
 
Does anyone else think that's a realy bad score for a i7?

I just compared it to a customers computer i just built using a i5 3470 and the i5 blows this i7 out of the water:wtf:
 

Attachments

  • i7-940.jpg
    i7-940.jpg
    151.1 KB · Views: 966
Does anyone else think that's a realy bad score for a i7?

I just compared it to a customers computer i just built using a i5 3470 and the i5 blows this i7 out of the water:wtf:

The i5 3470 has AVX. Look at the benchmarks without AVX. In my case:

AVX: Core i5-2320 3.1Ghz 080.498875Gflops
No AVX: Core i5-2320 3.1Ghz 044.105125Gflops

Test the 3470 with IBT 2.51 or earlier, it should give out different results.

Also HT seems to take a 2% hit on the Gflops.
 
AVX, I should've known :/
 
The i5 3470 has AVX. Look at the benchmarks without AVX. In my case:

AVX: Core i5-2320 3.1Ghz 080.498875Gflops
No AVX: Core i5-2320 3.1Ghz 044.105125Gflops

Test the 3470 with IBT 2.51 or earlier, it should give out different results.

Also HT seems to take a 2% hit on the Gflops.

Ahh ok well that makes sense then, was thinking wow maybe there was a problem with my i7 rig. Such a big difference 37 for i7 and 88 for the i5.
 
Formating is wrong. Fix it or newtekie won't add your result. It should be:

omegatotal | Intel | Q6600 @ 3.6Ghz | 046.2422 | 012.8450 | 64-bit | 8x450 24/7 1.425 Vcore

The extra |s and the large comment will break the table formatting. If you want to add details of your rig do so in the post.

meh


updated original
 
Last edited:
Add me

_JP_ | Intel | Core 2 Duo E7400 @ 2.8GHz | 018.4599 | 006.5928 | 64-bit | x64 run; DDRII 800MHz
c2de7400ibtx64.jpg

_JP_ | Intel | C2D Mobile P8400 @ 2.2GHz | 015.7078 | 007.1399 | 64-bit | x64 run

c2dmp8400ibtx64.jpg

_JP_ | AMD | Turion 64 X2 TL-58 @ 1.9GHz | 003.0381 | 001.5990 | 64-bit | Vista x64

tx2tl58ibtx64.jpg
 
You guys should really read the rules...

...no wonder newtekie doesn't update this anymore

spamynator_1 | AMD | FX 8320 @ 4.0ghz | 031.1828 | 007.7436 | 64-bit |

Fix'd.
 
Back
Top