• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Share your CPUZ Benchmarks!

The 17.01.64 CPUID bench shows very different score.
upload_2017-3-18_3-1-57-png.85292
upload_2017-4-29_23-14-1.png
upload_2017-4-29_23-13-43.png
upload_2017-4-29_23-15-32.png
 
It looks like CPU-z has updated and change that benchmark. So new results incoming.

I7 980X is what tested.
Stock
I7_980X_cpu-z_bench_stock.jpg

4.25 GHz
I7_980X_CPU-z_bench_4.25_GHz.jpg

4.7 ghz
I7_980X_CPU-z_bench_4.7_GHz.jpg
 
Very tempted to go 7700k
 

Attachments

  • Capture1.PNG
    Capture1.PNG
    16.5 KB · Views: 1,092
  • Capture2.PNG
    Capture2.PNG
    30.5 KB · Views: 854
haswell 4770k @ 4.5
YzY0YjY3OGNkNTVh.jpg
 
For now I'll stick with the FX8320 and FX8350 and I'll wait a little longer. Maybe I'll buy an Intel maybe AMD.. duno yet. Prices of the intel's bound to drop so..
 
fusseli said:
Very tempted to go 7700k
Click to expand...

I am a little skeptical of your result. Looks like it's throttling due to temperatures (I see the 23 multiplier, and assume 4.60 GHz). I was getting that with my APU beyond 4.80 GHz. Therefore, I'm not too sure how to interpret this for the graph.
 
Software overclocking FTW
If I try overclocking the bclk in the bios over 150, the PC won't start, no matter what I do (several seems to have this prob with these mobo in combination with westmere). So I try overclocking with easytune 6 in windows and I get 178Mhz bclk or 4.272Ghz core speed. :wtf:
(Srybadengl.)

4,270.PNG
 
birdie said:
I know it's difficult to reconcile with reality but it is what it is
Click to expand...

no difficulty, i owned that CPU (the K version) , but based off the perf of Much newer higher clocked CPU's, i was surprised to see a 2011 or 2012, 2500 @ stock do 400+ , thats all.

for example a 4770k doing about 80 points better with a extra Ghz of frequency. just seems off is all. its not that i cant belive the chip CAN do it, it just that i had trouble seeing it happen @ stock aka. A max of 3.7 Ghz.& i noticed you didnt run the front screen of cpuz showing actual clocks, so i thought it might be a mistake since cpuz always shows stock clocks on the bench screen
 
Last edited:
Kliim said:
Software overclocking FTW
If I try overclocking the bclk in the bios over 150, the PC won't start, no matter what I do (several seems to have this prob with these mobo in combination with westmere). So I try overclocking with easytune 6 in windows and I get 178Mhz bclk or 4.272Ghz core speed. :wtf:
(Srybadengl.)

View attachment 87386
Click to expand...


try dropping the multi to X 22

4.4.PNG
 
@CAPSLOCKSTUCK tried it, at 179 Mhz bluescreen without any load @1.344V. Which further voltages you have (QPI,PLL...)?
But it seems that 178 is the highest I can squeeze out of these board.
 
my PC : CPU-z

ST Score : 135
MT Score : 535

Win7 64bit / Cpu-z 64 bit

when I click "submit and compare", CPU-Z's Web page does not show me score, any idea? bench Just gives me only link with no score.
 
Last edited:
Kliim said:
@CAPSLOCKSTUCK tried it, at 179 Mhz bluescreen without any load @1.344V. Which further voltages you have (QPI,PLL...)?
But it seems that 178 is the highest I can squeeze out of these board.
Click to expand...


what CPU cooler do you have.?

All my volts are on auto.
 
Tower cooler with 120mm fan.
Ok, mine too so far, so they seem not the problem. Maybe I'll try it one time without smt.
 
jboydgolfer said:
no difficulty, i owned that CPU (the K version) , but based off the perf of Much newer higher clocked CPU's, i was surprised to see a 2011 or 2012, 2500 @ stock do 400+ , thats all.

for example a 4770k doing about 80 points better with a extra Ghz of frequency. just seems off is all. its not that i cant belive the chip CAN do it, it just that i had trouble seeing it happen @ stock aka. A max of 3.7 Ghz.& i noticed you didnt run the front screen of cpuz showing actual clocks, so i thought it might be a mistake since cpuz always shows stock clocks on the bench screen
Click to expand...

Well, the software itself comes with two baselines that don't make sense. The 6700K and 7600K both have the same ST turbo, and yet the i5 is faster in single-thread by 7%.
 
As @CAPSLOCKSTUCK (or was it someone else?) would say, long live X58 :D

CPU_Z_BENCH.png



PS. In Single Thread I beat a Ryzen...at least according to CPUZ's database...wow
 
Last edited:
hopefully have realworld ryzen 1800x results tomorrow.:toast:
ps.just spotted the run on the last page. those results are crazy.. cant wait...
 
I forgot to tell you guys. Last week, I got in contact with the developers and they told me that version 17 of the benchmark still utilizes scalar SSE2 instructions at most. No SSE3, SSE4 or AVX.

(I also contacted to notify them of the "i7-7600K" typo.)


purecain said:
hopefully have realworld ryzen 1800x results tomorrow.:toast:
ps.just spotted the run on the last page. those results are crazy.. cant wait...
Click to expand...

Awesome. It'll be interesting to have an 1800X result with SMT enabled. :)
 
Last edited:
meh... with 2 games running in the background
upload_2017-5-6_3-15-4.png
 
nice, I'm having to wait a couple more days as I didn't like the replacement back plate for the temporary water cooling. so bought an am4 bracket. just waiting on delivery now... :toast:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top