• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Super Pi 1m scores

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lil toying for now.

Capture005.jpg
 
hehe nice, those P4's o/c nice i think. Isn't there a few on HWbot that are at like 7 or 8 GHz???
 
Prolly not farther than that, was just playing a bit with it, only cpu I currently have in my possesion, picked up a E8600 today, but won't have it for a few days.
 
Prolly not farther than that, was just playing a bit with it, only cpu I currently have in my possesion, picked up a E8600 today, but won't have it for a few days.

cool. The E8600 should be fun for playing around with Super Pi :cool:
 
@dark

Guess you weren't lying! Either way I wasnt doubting you tho. Pretty decent clock on that older cpu.

@Chicken

Hope you can get a good clock on that 9950! Post a SuperPI once you get a chance.

@everyone

Still no input on 4:5 266 vs 5:6 333 boot straps?
 
@Chicken

Hope you can get a good clock on that 9950! Post a SuperPI once you get a chance.

I don't think I got a good chip this time, having a hard time being stable at 3.4 GHz.
 
Wow! I noticed @ 3.2Ghz you are almost matching an q8200@3.3 in cpu score. Very nice!

I just scored 4924 at 3.4 GHz, i'll post up a bit more in a bit.
 
tnx :)

its burning hot using air cooling TR true black 120 to cool it down :)
 
I dont need 1.78V on Vcore with a Q6600 to get to 4GHz stable.. used 1.535V for 4000MHz so 1.78V for 100MHz extra is crazy..

cause my mobo suck thats why :banghead:
 
I dont need 1.78V on Vcore with a Q6600 to get to 4GHz stable.. used 1.535V for 4000MHz so 1.78V for 100MHz extra is crazy..

Has alot to do with the steppings to Lauri....Maybe his CPU isnt as efficient as yours. Also I have seen it before where at extremem ends of Overclocking it does sometimes take crazy volts to get just 100MHz more
 
You should get a new mobo before killing a 200$ CPU..

will change my whole unit soon when Nehalems will be cheap as my current setup :)

well its just for benching my temps didn't even pass 70c 66c was the highest temp in core 1 65 below for d 3 other cores...
 
will change my whole unit soon when Nehalems will be cheap as my current setup :)

well its just for benching my temps didn't even pass 70c 66c was the highest temp in core 1 65 below for d 3 other cores...

The temps doenst even need to be high that a CPU degrade at high volt..
 
They can overclock, but they are still shitty. P4 3.0@3.6

zenith.jpg
 
oh ok, gotcha now, I know some radiators are called like 120 or something like that so I got confused.

Damn man, thats pretty nuts though. I saw in the 3dmark thread, you ran 3.9 GHz at 1.552v? How are temps then, are they much lower. they should be I would say.
 
oh ok, gotcha now, I know some radiators are called like 120 or something like that so I got confused.

Damn man, thats pretty nuts though. I saw in the 3dmark thread, you ran 3.9 GHz at 1.552v? How are temps then, are they much lower. they should be I would say.

I have a friend w/ same Mobo Asus Commando & a Q6600 @ 4.1GHz he needs 1.85 vcore but he is using watercooling so that might help... yeah pretty nuts eh but damn Q6600 65nm are tougher to break compared to 45nm's :rockout:

in 3Dmark06 hitting 60c+ on all cores as I remember but never reaches 70c...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top