• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Unigine Benchmark Compilation

a_ump said:
okay, i'm fine with tryin that, but i won't take the time to do so n test until u tell me why lol. I can't comprehend why a lower CPU clock would improve my score...
Click to expand...

Tell you what...overclock that cpu some more and re-run the bench to see which direction you go. ;)

(If you look at my scores in the Heaven section you will see I have lowered my cpu clocks. It is plain to see that I can run up to 5GHz and chose not to...there is a reason.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HammerON|EVGA GTX 470|870/963|1514|i7 920@4.08GHz

Capture138687.jpg
 
a_ump said:
i guess i'm somehow missing something but did u post ur screens 3x each?
Click to expand...

Let me tell you what's missing ... the rest of the girl :roll:
 
rickss69 said:
Tell you what...overclock that cpu some more and re-run the bench to see which direction you go. ;)

(If you look at my scores in the Heaven section you will see I have lowered my cpu clocks. It is plain to see that I can run up to 5GHz and chose not to...there is a reason.)
Click to expand...

true but all of your clocks are still 3.9ghz or higher lol up to 4.5ghz. i don't really consider that down clocking :P
 
Something must be wrong, i just scored LESS with my new system then i did with my old FX-57 and windows XP :confused:

wtf???
 

Attachments

  • tropics.jpg
    tropics.jpg
    195.4 KB · Views: 561
a_ump said:
true but all of your clocks are still 3.9ghz or higher lol up to 4.5ghz. i don't really consider that down clocking :P
Click to expand...

If you can't clock any higher then you certainly could go lower. I must admit I am perplexed at your resistance to even consider it. Oh well....
 

Attachments

  • ScreenHunter_01 Aug. 17 23.34.jpg
    ScreenHunter_01 Aug. 17 23.34.jpg
    186.7 KB · Views: 553
  • ScreenHunter_01 Aug. 17 23.40.jpg
    ScreenHunter_01 Aug. 17 23.40.jpg
    187.6 KB · Views: 589
Arctucas|2x eVGA GTX 460 SC EE 1GB SLI|860/1050/1720|1599|E6750@3.2GHz
 

Attachments

  • Heaven.jpg
    Heaven.jpg
    203.9 KB · Views: 546
Last edited:
Arctucas|2x eVGA GTX 460 SC EE 1GB SLI|860/1050/1720|3343|E6750@3.2GHz
 

Attachments

  • Tropics.jpg
    Tropics.jpg
    191.2 KB · Views: 557
Last edited:
Arctucas|2x eVGA GTX 460 SC EE 1GB SLI|860/1050/1720|10084|E6750@3.2GHz
 

Attachments

  • Sanctuary.jpg
    Sanctuary.jpg
    197.1 KB · Views: 499
Last edited:
Posting for PP

PP Mguire|eVGA GTX465|875/1750/1750|25560|i5 750@4.2Ghz

heavennormal42ghzaa.jpg
 
Last edited:
Updated
 
randomflip|GIGABYTE 5970 + HIS 5870|900/1200|2572|i7 930 @4.2ghz

edit!

unigineh.jpg
 
Edited my previous post to reflect new driver and higher clocks.
 
Guys my Card scored a 978 using the settings recommend in this thread.

Clocks are 975/1255

Is this normal? It just doesn't seem right.:confused:

My CCC settings are default.
 
heaven212.png


Edited to show updated score with slight overclock on GPU/memory
 
Last edited:
Trickson | XFX HD5770 |875/1215 / 950/1435 / Q9650 @4.0GHz

Well I did a run with mine here is what I got .
Not sure how well it is but seems really nice to me . ;)
 

Attachments

  • thetest.jpg
    thetest.jpg
    181.2 KB · Views: 499
Capture001300.jpg

1280x1024
johnnyfiive | HD 6870 (2)| 900/1050 | 2110 | i7 950 @ 4.2

Capture002.jpg

1920x1080 (ran this at x4, forgot to change it.)
johnnyfiive | HD 6870 (2)| 900/1050 | 1620 | i7 950 @ 4.2
 
I ran all the benchmarks again on my new rig:

Arctucas|2x eVGA GTX 460 SC EE 1GB SLI|860/1050/1720|2065|i7 950 @ 4110

Heaven11-17-10.jpg



Arctucas|2x eVGA GTX 460 SC EE 1GB SLI|860/1050/1720|3762|i7 950 @ 4110

Tropics11-17-10.jpg



Arctucas|2x eVGA GTX 460 SC EE 1GB SLI|860/1050/1720|11412|i7 950 @ 4110

Santuary11-17-10.jpg
 
Ok I ran the test using the new cat 10.12 with the new CCC drivers I ran both DX10 and DX11 tests . I see that DX11 is way slower than DX10 and well that has me some what confused . at any rate this is what I have . And stock settings .
trickson |XFX HD5770 crossfire | 850/1200 |(DX10) 1281 |Q9650 @4Ghz |

trickson |XFX HD5770 crossfire | 850/1200 |(DX11) 799 |Q9650 @4Ghz |

Not bad for every thing being stock and all ;)
 

Attachments

  • Untitled10.jpg
    Untitled10.jpg
    100.1 KB · Views: 472
  • Untitled11.jpg
    Untitled11.jpg
    96.4 KB · Views: 516
Last edited:
johnnyfiive said:
http://img.techpowerup.org/101115/Capture001300.jpg
1280x1024
johnnyfiive | HD 6870 (2)| 900/1050 | 2110 | i7 950 @ 4.2

http://img.techpowerup.org/101115/Capture002.jpg
1920x1080 (ran this at x4, forgot to change it.)
johnnyfiive | HD 6870 (2)| 900/1050 | 1620 | i7 950 @ 4.2
Click to expand...
You need to run with 4×AA to qualify to comparison.
trickson said:
Ok I ran the test using the new cat 10.12 with the new CCC drivers I ran both DX10 and DX11 tests . I see that DX11 is way slower than DX10 and well that has me some what confused . at any rate this is what I have . And stock settings .
trickson |XFX HD5770 crossfire | 850/1200 |(DX10) 1281 |Q9650 @4Ghz |

trickson |XFX HD5770 crossfire | 850/1200 |(DX11) 799 |Q9650 @4Ghz |

Not bad for every thing being stock and all ;)
Click to expand...
You should use SXGA (1280×1024) instead of UXGA (1600×1200).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top