• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

WPrime Benchmark

Version 2.00 & 2.01 was bugged that's fine but now they have version 2.05 & they can't be all bugged...;)

Sure the newer version should improve performance a little bit as any software out there , that is why there is updates in the first place , fixing bugs...

Anyhow it would be time to move on & use the new version 2.05 IMO , what do you think?
 
What does anybody else think about this? Mixing scores of different versions won't be a good idea, new thread?
 
What does anybody else think about this? Mixing scores of different versions won't be a good idea, new thread?

I think the same, a new thread for WPrime 2.05 would be right IMO :)
 
What does anybody else think about this? Mixing scores of different versions won't be a good idea, new thread?

People could just re-bench with the new version or write beside they scores what version they used..
Anyhow if someone wants to make a new thread for it then it's all fine with me
 
I tested with 2.05 in my main computer and I got a bit difference

43.353 with 1.55
44,959 with the 2.05
:)
 
People could just re-bench with the new version or write beside they scores what version they used..
Anyhow if someone wants to make a new thread for it then it's all fine with me

not everyone has all of the chips they had before. not to mention this is the benchmark they use in hwbot still so you only have to do one benchmark to hit both sets of scores.
 
Anybody else have any input? I'm not sure if to start a new thread or add it all to the OP, any suggestions?
 
Capture077.jpg
 
Last edited:
My new 1045T with mild overclock and undervolted.

WPrime_1045T_3105Mhz.jpg
 
Will update later today once I'm home. Good job! :toast:
 
2 x 2435 Opteron Socket F
Score 5.58

Opty_2435.jpg
 
Can you get this bench mark from any other website?
It keeps giving me this error.


Internal Server Error

The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

Please contact the server administrator, walter_eigner@msn.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.

More information about this error may be available in the server error log.
 
You can get it at hwbot.org I would get the link but I can't view the site on my android for some reason


Can you get this bench mark from any other website?
It keeps giving me this error.


Internal Server Error

The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

Please contact the server administrator, walter_eigner@msn.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.

More information about this error may be available in the server error log.
 
1100T @4ghz and 3ghz NB
wpbench.jpg

:toast:
 
Nobody posted any score for Bulldozer cpus? that bad?
 
Capture034.jpg


It may be slower in most of these types of benches but don't let this cpu fool you. It "feels" like my old 655k @ 3.8Ghz but with better gpu scaling.
 
Nobody posted any score for Bulldozer cpus? that bad?

They should regardless. But you are right, just noticed, no BD's on the list. :(

http://img.techpowerup.org/120420/Capture034.jpg

It may be slower in most of these types of benches but don't let this cpu fool you. It "feels" like my old 655k @ 3.8Ghz but with better gpu scaling.

That was at 3.3 GHz?

All I see is Speedstep clocks.. :(

On JR's post?
 
Back
Top