Friday, February 2nd 2024

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Formally Launched

NVIDIA today formally launched the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB as its new entry-level discrete GPU. The RTX 3050 6 GB is a significantly different product from the original RTX 3050 that the company launched as a mid-range product way back in January 2022. The RTX 3050 had originally launched on the 8 nm GA106 silicon, with 2,560 CUDA cores, 80 Tensor cores, 20 RT cores, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs; with 8 GB of 14 Gbps GDDR6 memory across a 128-bit memory bus; these specs also matched the maximum core-configuration of the smaller GA107 silicon, and so the company launched the RTX 3050 based on GA107 toward the end of 2022, with no change in specs, but a slight improvement in energy efficiency from the switch to the smaller silicon. The new RTX 3060 6 GB is based on the same GA107 silicon, but with significant changes.

To begin with, the most obvious change is memory. The new SKU features 6 GB of 14 Gbps GDDR6, across a narrower 96-bit memory bus, for 168 GB/s of memory bandwidth. That's not all, the GPU is significantly cut down, with just 16 SM instead of the 20 found on the original RTX 3050. This works out to 2,048 CUDA cores, 64 Tensor cores, 16 RT cores, 64 TMUs, and an unchanged 32 ROPs. The GPU comes with lower clock speeds of 1470 MHz boost, compared to 1777 MHz on the original RTX 3050. The silver lining with this SKU is its total graphics power (TGP) of just 70 W, which means that cards can completely do away with power connectors, and rely entirely on PCIe slot power. NVIDIA hasn't listed its own MSRP for this SKU, but last we heard, it was supposed to go for $179, and square off against the likes of the Intel Arc A580.
Add your own comment

65 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Formally Launched

#1
theouto
Make it an ITX card and you have yourself an interesting little nugget.
Posted on Reply
#2
bug
Jeez, in 2010 that kind of money bought you a 460. And that was a seriously good card.
Posted on Reply
#3
Rexter
theoutoMake it an ITX card and you have yourself an interesting little nugget.
If you scrolled a littler further down you would have noticed this:
Gigabyte Launches GeForce RTX 3050 6G graphics cards | TechPowerUp
bugJeez, in 2010 that kind of money bought you a 460. And that was seriously good card.
Yup, absolute insanity. Even taking inflation into consideration, NVIDIA (and AMD for that matter) has done all in their power to push price brackets ever upwards.
Posted on Reply
#5
azrael
The graphics card absolutely no one asked for...
Posted on Reply
#6
wNotyarD
azraelThe graphics card absolutely no one asked for...
Actually, this card has a niche if it comes in single-slot low-profile SKUs taking power solely from the PCIe slot. Namely, those on SFF builds with no PCIe power connector to spare (e.g. upgrading a Dell SFF PC).

But would it hurt NVIDIA to call this a RT(X) 3040 to alleviate confusion?
Posted on Reply
#7
pressing on
NVIDIA's response to the AMD Radeon 780M graphics unit in the 8700G. They want buyers to weigh up whether they should go for the 8700G at $325 or the 3050 6GB for $180 with a CPU costing $145. The RTX 3050 6GB is so gimped that the performance gap might be a lot tighter than NVIDIA was banking on.
Posted on Reply
#8
bug
pressing onNVIDIA's response to the AMD Radeon 780M graphics unit in the 8700G. They want buyers to weigh up whether they should go for the 8700G at $325 or the 3050 6GB for $180 with a CPU costing $145. The RTX 3050 6GB is so gimped that the performance gap might be a lot tighter than NVIDIA was banking on.
I doubt that very much. People looking at the 8700G and people looking to build a system with a dGPU aren't likely to switch sides. There are very, very few uses for a system equipped with a 3050 these days. It's mostly aimed at pre-builds sold to clueless buyers.

Edit: If Nvidia gets Lenovo or HP to build some systems around these, there's a few hundred thousands SKUs sold. Easily.
Posted on Reply
#9
maxfly
Comes with mini electric wheelchair to get it over the hump. What a turd.
Posted on Reply
#10
Assimilator
Waiting for manufacturers to completely miss the point of this card and lump it with dual-slot full-height coolers and ancillary power connectors.

Manufacturers, get a clue. Low-profile and/or single slot, purely PCIe slot-powered, or stop wasting our time.
Posted on Reply
#11
Daven
I think its safe to say that there will not be a 4050. That means the 4060 will be the budget GPU for for the next gen 5000 series. If that happens, the 5060 Ti might be the lowest priced part.
Posted on Reply
#12
bug
DavenI think its safe to say that there will not be a 4050. That means the 4060 will be the budget GPU for for the next gen 5000 series. If that happens, the 5060 Ti might be the lowest priced part.
Still getting hung up on box labels instead of actual GPU capability, are we?
For that matter, the 4060 is more in line with past x50 cards than it is with past true mid-rangers.
Posted on Reply
#13
Daven
bugStill getting hung up on box labels instead of actual GPU capability, are we?
For that matter, the 4060 is more in line with past x50 cards than it is with past true mid-rangers.
My main point is the possible starting price to own an RTX 5000 series. It could be $400 or higher to buy into that series. A price point ever increasingly out of reach regardless of specs.
Posted on Reply
#14
bug
DavenMy main point is the possible starting price to own an RTX 5000 series. It could be $400 or higher to buy into that series. A price point ever increasingly out of reach regardless of specs.
I saw that problem coming a mile away: RT is hard for high-end cards, there was no way Nvidia could push that into the low end. For the first gen, they did the GTX 16xx series. Now they're reselling previous gen silicon. They have to be really creative about this, they won't be able to push RT into the low end for quite a while.
Posted on Reply
#18
kapone32
For me they are trying to advantage of of the Ray Tracing and DLSS narrative. This card has worse specs than my laptop 3060 from 2021.
Posted on Reply
#19
Beginner Macro Device


All that means the only possible reasonable purchase scenario is SFF without the possibility of adding 6-pin connectors, or even thinking of drawing more power than that. For $200, there are used 3060s (almost twice as fast at this point) and 6600 XTs as well as BNIB 6600 non-XTs and Intel Arc GPUs of much higher calculating power. Adding 20 USD on top of 180 isn't that hard. So if you're by no mean limited in space and power to the point you consider <100 W GPUs exclusively this is a total pass.
Posted on Reply
#20
Prima.Vera
This should have been a single slot, small factor form card for 99$, the right price. The rest is just nGreedia TAX.
Posted on Reply
#21
wNotyarD
Beginner Micro Device

All that means the only possible reasonable purchase scenario is SFF without the possibility of adding 6-pin connectors, or even thinking of drawing more power than that. For $200, there are used 3060s (almost twice as fast at this point) and 6600 XTs as well as BNIB 6600 non-XTs and Intel Arc GPUs of much higher calculating power. Adding 20 USD on top of 180 isn't that hard. So if you're by no mean limited in space and power to the point you consider <100 W GPUs exclusively this is a total pass.
This new 3050 should be stronger that a 3050 Mobile which is even more power constrained, and that one sits a bit below the 570. So yeah, RX580 to GTX1650S-level performance is the most we should expect of this.
Posted on Reply
#22
Ruined Mind
I prefer Low-Profile cards that have a Dual-Slot implementation, because they have more room to include a better cooling system (two fans, and a larger heatsink behind the fans).
Posted on Reply
#23
Beginner Macro Device
wNotyarDSo yeah, RX580 to GTX1650S-level performance is the most we should expect of this.
And this is obtainable for 50 to 100 USD on the aftermarket with ease. Occasionally it's even below 50 USD.

I mean, you won't be upset over not supporting the game that otherwise would "run" at 10 FPS if you had a 3050-6 instead of an RX 580.
Posted on Reply
#24
RayneYoruka
I'm glad I decided to just pick a 3060 12G for my streaming rig.. what a waste lmao
Posted on Reply
#25
bug
RayneYorukaI'm glad I decided to just pick a 3060 12G for my streaming rig.. what a waste lmao
Tbh the low-end has rarely had good $/perf products. A few good ones here and there, but it's mostly a "why bother instead of going IGP" decision.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 16th, 2024 16:17 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts