Wednesday, April 18th 2012

AMD and Google in Race to Buy Out MIPS

AMD and Google are locked in a race to buy out MIPS, an application processor architecture designer competitive to ARM. AMD comes from a decades old presence in the microprocessor industry, while Google is a satrap with smartphones, tablets, and other mobile computing devices thanks to its Android operating system. With Microsoft opening up to ARM architecture with Windows 8 RT, it is in Google's interests to hedge its bets on an alternative machine architecture to both x86 and ARM. The easiest way to that is buying out MIPS and funding development of powerful processors based on it. For AMD, it's a bid to stay competitive in the low-power processor market as Intel began making inroads to smartphone processor market.
Sources: Bright Side of News, X-bit Labs
Add your own comment

33 Comments on AMD and Google in Race to Buy Out MIPS

#26
amd/atifiend
i must say if i had the disposable income i might consider investing in AMD. I am starting to like their approach to diversification....i just hope they do not spread their resources too thin and have to spin off their investments before they can produce fruitful returns.

^ that would be funny if AMD won the race and then google bought AMD but i do not believe the x86 license is transferable.
Posted on Reply
#27
Thefumigator
faramirUltra-cheap Android tablet, based on MIPS CPU (SoC actually). This works because Linux (which Android is based upon) runs on MIPS for ages. Recompiling native applications should be no more difficult than porting from x86 to ARM for example.
KantasticThe world's first Google-authorized ICS tablet was the Chinese-made, MIPS-based, 7" Ainol Novo 7 Paladin tablet. It sells for sub-$100 and ships from China, but without hours of tweaking, it fails to run even the most common apps
Are you sure of this? because for what I know android apps are architecture-agnostic, as they are written in java and run over a android framework. I have programmed some small things, I know in some cases where you write arm code, then it won't run on mips.

If you heard those problems on release, maybe it was running something below 4.0
Actually, they are selling the ainol novo with android 4.0, for less than 100$

As an example Angry birds runs perfectly fine without a glitch. It seems it doesn't have any arm code in it.
Posted on Reply
#28
Thefumigator
amd/atifiendi must say if i had the disposable income i might consider investing in AMD. I am starting to like their approach to diversification....i just hope they do not spread their resources too thin and have to spin off their investments before they can produce fruitful returns.
I was going to buy AMD stock in year 2000... I just couldn't.
It would have been smarter choice to buy google stock but when I realized it was 200x more expensive than when I started planning something.
Posted on Reply
#29
kid41212003
SteevoAMD needs this, if Google wins they will have a foothold to dramatically undercut the smartphone market with low cost devices, drive out competition, and then stop innovation.
Only if it beat ARM by a huge margin, but even so like in Intel vs AMD's case, AMD didn't go out of business.

You are overacted.
Posted on Reply
#30
Goodman
Makavelilol I was just gonna say this google can buy amd 10x over.

What race!!
Even worst Google worth much more than Intel 197.50B vs 139.97B :eek:
Posted on Reply
#31
faramir
ThefumigatorAre you sure of this? because for what I know android apps are architecture-agnostic, as they are written in java and run over a android framework. I have programmed some small things, I know in some cases where you write arm code, then it won't run on mips.
Java (Dalvik) apps should run just fine. That guy is grossly exagarating.
Posted on Reply
#32
ompak5
i think its not just MIPS architecture, its more on TALENT, AMD needs more engineer to power their desktop,server and netbooks processor (low power usage) (MIPS architecture beat all ARM in power usage even at 64 nanometere vs 40 and 28 nanometer). and i think they want to improve their mobile computing... heheheehe. i hope AMD wins here...
Posted on Reply
#33
Thefumigator
ompak5i think its not just MIPS architecture, its more on TALENT, AMD needs more engineer to power their desktop,server and netbooks processor (low power usage) (MIPS architecture beat all ARM in power usage even at 64 nanometere vs 40 and 28 nanometer). and i think they want to improve their mobile computing... heheheehe. i hope AMD wins here...
If AMD wins, the interesting thing will be not only the chip vs chip war, but the architecture vs architecture too.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 23rd, 2024 15:10 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts