Tuesday, September 16th 2014

Lexar Introduces World's Fastest SD UHS-II Cards

Lexar, a leading global brand of flash memory products, today announced the new Lexar Professional 2000x SDHC/SDXC UHS-II cards, the fastest UHS-II memory cards available on the market today. To complement the new line and create a full portfolio of SD UHS-II products, Lexar also announced new Professional 1000x SDHC/SDXC UHS-II cards and the new Professional Workflow SR2, a SD UHS-II USB 3.0 reader.

The new Lexar Professional 2000x SDHC/SDXC UHS-II memory cards leverage the new Ultra High Speed II, UHS Speed Class 3 (U3) specification, to quickly capture and transfer high-quality photos and 1080p full-HD, 3D, and 4K video. Available in 32 GB and 64 GB capacities, the cards offer transfer speeds up to 300 MB per second and write speeds up to 260 MB per second. Additionally, every 2000x SDHC/SDXC UHS-II card includes a SD UHS-II reader for high-speed file transfer of photos and videos from the card to any PC or Mac, offering users immediate performance right out of the package.
Rounding out the new SD UHS-II card line up, the Lexar Professional 1000x SDHC/SDXC UHS-II cards provide read transfer speeds up to 150 MB per second and write transfer speeds up to 95 MB per second. The cards are available in a full range of capacities, from 16 GB to 256 GB. The Professional 1000x SDHC/SDXC UHS-II line of memory cards offer professional photographers, videographers, and enthusiasts great performance at a more affordable price.

"UHS-II technology really raises the bar in terms of performance. The latest UHS-II additions to our Lexar Professional product portfolio provide users the ability to capture and offload work even faster, so they can get back to what's important--capturing great images and video," said Adam Kaufman, director of card product marketing, Lexar. "Our multi-line UHS-II product offering gets performance into the hands of any user at a great value and with the Professional 2000x card, it comes right out of the box."

To complete the new UHS-II product portfolio, the Lexar Professional Workflow line has expanded to include the Professional Workflow SR2 reader, a SD UHS-II USB 3.0 reader. The Professional Workflow SR2 reader is compatible with both the new 2000x and 1000x SDHC/SDXC UHS-II cards, as well as the Professional Workflow HR2 (Thunderbolt 2/USB 3.0 reader and storage drive hub) and Professional Workflow HR1 (USB 3.0 reader and storage drive hub). The readers are sold separately so users can configure a hub into an ideal solution that meets their unique workflow needs, or can use the readers individually while on the go.

The Professional 2000x and 1000x SDHC/SDXC UHS-II cards are backwards compatible with older cameras and readers, performing at UHS-I and Class 10 speeds. The cards also include the latest version of Image Rescue software and come with a limited lifetime warranty. The Lexar Professional 2000x card will be available in Q4 with MSRPs of $184.99 (64 GB) and $105.99 (32 GB). The Lexar Professional 1000x card will also be available in Q4 and has MSRPs of $546.99 (256 GB), $174.99 (128 GB), $97.99 (64 GB), $55.99 (32 GB), and $31.99 (16 GB), while the Lexar Professional Workflow SR2 reader has an MSRP of $29.99 and will be available in Q4.
Add your own comment

5 Comments on Lexar Introduces World's Fastest SD UHS-II Cards

#1
HopelesslyFaithful
what are the 4k and 512k read and writes? that number is useless without knowing those. In the end it could only run at 50MBps in the real world. Wish they would just post crystaldiskmark benchmarks. If these actually beat the sandisk extreme in all tests i might be interested but if 4k is .00000004MBps it can suck it for all i care. Or if 512k is 1MBps it is useless.
Posted on Reply
#2
TheLostSwede
News Editor
Considering that they're for video, sequential speeds matter a lot more in this case.
Posted on Reply
#3
HopelesslyFaithful
Well considering back when we used class 6 and class 10 cards the class 6 usually did 720p recording better -_- I remember my class 6 cards were the only ones that could record 720p without stopping 30-120s in recording. The reason for that was crap 4k and 512k read/writes. Even if you transfer "sequential data" it never pans out to be sequential data ever. I'll transfer 30-50MB raw files and it won't hit sequential speeds. The drives with the higher 4k and 512k always do better. I have had cards with better sequential speeds and horrible 4k and 512k read/writes and they always were slowing in taking and transferring files. particularly transferring. Considering Win 7 dumps 1-2GB in RAM to transfer to cards that should be sequential but never pans out.
Posted on Reply
#4
arterius2
HopelesslyFaithfulWell considering back when we used class 6 and class 10 cards the class 6 usually did 720p recording better -_- I remember my class 6 cards were the only ones that could record 720p without stopping 30-120s in recording. The reason for that was crap 4k and 512k read/writes. Even if you transfer "sequential data" it never pans out to be sequential data ever. I'll transfer 30-50MB raw files and it won't hit sequential speeds. The drives with the higher 4k and 512k always do better. I have had cards with better sequential speeds and horrible 4k and 512k read/writes and they always were slowing in taking and transferring files. particularly transferring. Considering Win 7 dumps 1-2GB in RAM to transfer to cards that should be sequential but never pans out.
Dude, stay focused! Like another person already pointed out, these are cards are designed to be used in action cameras such as the GoPro - recording large video files, random read/writes don't really matter. You shouldn't be using these as harddrives.
Posted on Reply
#5
HopelesslyFaithful
you missed my point. I take raw pictures that are 30-50MB and random have an impact on that. My point is even if it states 120MBps but has bad 512k and 4k read/rights it could have bad real world results because of the 4k/ 512k speeds. Even sequential in real world results are affected by 4k and 512k speeds. It has to do with how the data is actually put on the drive. It doesn't always write how you want it to write. Just find 2 exact same cards with comparable sequential read and rights but one with good 512k/4k and see how it is affected. Many times it only fills partial blocks and it slows down.
Posted on Reply
Apr 16th, 2024 04:22 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts