Wednesday, May 27th 2020

Intel Slightly Upgrades Stock Coolers for Some of its Higher 10th Gen Core and Xeon-W

Intel is packing a slightly improved stock heatsink-fan (HSF) cooling solution with some of its higher-end 10th generation Core desktop and select Xeon-W processors. The cooler, while nowhere close in size or weight to the TS15A, features a slightly thicker heatsink with a copper core, compared to the one included with lower-end parts such as the i5-10400. This heatsink's primary material is black anodized aluminium, with a copper core. The fan's cable is now black sleeved, instead of being a loose bunch of four ketchup-and-mustard wires. The hub of the fan, which usually had a white or blue label with ugly regulatory markings, now has a solid grey sticker with just the Intel logo.

There are no performance numbers, but the cooler looks physically similar to the copper core coolers Intel used to include with some of its oldest LGA115x processors, such as "Lynnfield" and " Sandy Bridge," capable of handling 95 W TDP. Intel is including the cooler with the Core i9-10900, the i9-10900F, i7-10700F, i7-10700; and Xeon W-1290, W-1270, and W-1250 boxed processors in the DIY retail channel.
Sources: NguyencongPC, ChipHell Forums, Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

33 Comments on Intel Slightly Upgrades Stock Coolers for Some of its Higher 10th Gen Core and Xeon-W

#26
londiste
ElysiumThis is just plain pathetic. If a reality existed where the Wraith Spire was socket cross-compatible, it would completely cuck this thing, and the Max/Prism would cuck the TS15A too.
AMD bundles Wraith Stealth with 65W CPUs.
Posted on Reply
#28
Elysium
londisteAMD bundles Wraith Stealth with 65W CPUs.
The highest-perf chip in the Stealth stack is the 3600; that and everything below it actually is a 65W chip. Does that puny thing in the images look like it could adequately cool a 10-core chip? Heck, does it even look like it could cool 95W? Maybe at 2000RPM all the time...

I wouldn't put that thing on a 3300X, let alone an i9.
Posted on Reply
#29
londiste
ElysiumThe highest-perf chip in the Stealth stack is the 3600; that and everything below it actually is a 65W chip. Does that puny thing in the images look like it could adequately cool a 10-core chip? Heck, does it even look like it could cool 95W? Maybe at 2000RPM all the time...

I wouldn't put that thing on a 3300X, let alone an i9.
3600 runs at 88W power limit.
Based on previous generations of Intel CPUs all the Intel CPUs shipping with this cooler have a long-term 65W power limit (with higher power limit for a short time).
10 cores at 2.8GHz, why not?
Posted on Reply
#30
Caring1
ratirtMaybe it will spin faster.
They would have to paint it red first. :roll:
Posted on Reply
#31
Chrispy_
So they've made it less ugly but it's still the same pathetic heatsink.

For these ~160W chips we need the old Socket 775 coolers - basically the exact same design it has been for a decade, but tall enough to actually cool something for a change.



Were these good? No, but what actually mattered is that they weren't so bad that CPUs would throttle, something the current coolers haven't managed since Sandy Bridge.

Also, I laughed at this which is trending on r/AMD:

Posted on Reply
#32
Elysium
londiste3600 runs at 88W power limit.
Based on previous generations of Intel CPUs all the Intel CPUs shipping with this cooler have a long-term 65W power limit (with higher power limit for a short time).
10 cores at 2.8GHz, why not?
That's a deep upper load limit for the 3600 though and it's rarely going to shoot through the TDP roof unless the user has altered voltage and clock settings. You make a good note about previous gens shipping with the same cooler but that's just the same old bad Intel behaviour we've come to know and love. It's also worth mentioning that previous mainstream gens have never had a 10-core chip; what happens when those cores inevitably go past 2.8GHz? I don't think even 2000RPM will cut it on this cooler.
Posted on Reply
#33
KarymidoN
lets see... the competition has a decent box cooler that can keep the processor under standard boost conditions.
Intel Box cooler can't even manage to push their processor to the advised boost speeds (thats why they used "UP TO*" on their marketing material.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 24th, 2024 14:29 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts