Friday, July 3rd 2020

Enmotus, Company Behind Original StoreMI, Launches FuzeDrive NVMe SSD

Enmotus is the company behind the FuzeDrive software on which the original AMD StoreMI technology is based, which juggles data among your various physical storage devices based on heat (frequency of access), improving performance. The company has now come up with its first hardware-product, the FuzeDrive NVMe SSD. Built in an M.2-2280 form-factor, the drive offers 1.6 TB of capacity, and combines a Phison E12-series controller with 96-layer 3D QLC NAND flash memory. The drive takes advantage of PCI-Express gen 3.0 x4.

Performance numbers of the FuzeDrive 1.6 TB SSD as rated by its makers include up to 3,470 MB/s sequential reads, up to 3,000 MB/s sequential writes; and an endurance rating of 5,000 TBW. The drive uses a 128 GB SLC cache to speed up write performance in moderate bursts. There's more to this drive than just its hard-product, Enmotus includes software that juggles data between the 128 GB pseudo-SLC and QLC areas; and of course the FuzeDrive software that lets you build volumes of up to 15 TB in size by throwing in fixed physical drives of any shape and size. Enmotus is pricing the FuzeDrive 1.6 TB NVMe SSD at $349.

Update Jul 3rd: We've learned through Enmotus that this drive has a permanent 128 GB SLC cache that's exclusive of the 1.6 TB QLC user-area. We believe this drive is possibly a 2 TB QLC drive, in which a quarter of the user area is permanently assigned to work as SLC, with 30,000 P/E cycles. The FuzeDrive firmware transfers hot data between the SLC and QLC areas of the drive.
Add your own comment

27 Comments on Enmotus, Company Behind Original StoreMI, Launches FuzeDrive NVMe SSD

#26
Unter_Dog
I have one on my desk, let me know if there is anything specific you want me to look at. Probably switch my office system drive over from a 970EVO.

Brandon
Posted on Reply
#27
Unter_Dog
VaderNo worries, i'm happy to see a detailed response.

I can see now where you're coming from.

However, there is something else we haven't talked about, and that is network bandwith vs QLC write speeds. Looking at the data in other reviews, QLC seems to settle at around 100MB/s, it takes almost a saturated gigabit connection to overcome that, which is not all that very common. There is still usefulness in the drive i think; in the real world most people would be using the drive for other stuff as well, so that would take away some of the overhead.

Upon further examination, i believe there's a bigger picture that we've missed so far. With the included software, there's the possibility of arranging big storage spaces with (probably) mechanical HDDs, with this SSD working as a cache drive. With such arrangement, there i can see a good chance of this drive being more useful than competing drives, even more so than the torrent case scenario
FYI currently cannot extend boot drive
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 25th, 2024 15:35 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts