R0H1TIf past is any indication then 8-12 quarters easily, assuming only their consumer cards bear losses because if HPC or enterprise ones are also sold on something like "contra revenues" then they'll have to jump ship faster than mice on the Titanic o_O

Of course knowing Intel they'll probably charge you for OCing these cards or turning 3d acceleration on via their premium (upgrade) plans :laugh:

InVasManiThat shows just how badly Nvidia manipulated and distorted consumers quite frankly with deceptive advertising. A lot of people bought into RTRT cards based on that video thinking they would end up with something similar or modestly similar and yet look at Cyber Punk they had to handicap poly count in the end just to insert the bits of RTRT they did insert into the game. Plus that demo of Nvidia's is 24 FPS and no one in their right mind is going to considering gaming at 24 FPS reasonably fluid there is just too much input lag at that FPS. It's noticeably better even at 30FPS on input lag and still not great and further still at 36 FPS it's really not until about 48FPS average things start to approach a generally decent experience that feels fairly responsive. Until GPU's can start to integrate better frame interpolation around a FPS render target like that to compensate for it that type of frame rate will ever being very satisfying to end users. The fact is even 60 FPS is a bit of a general crutch for input responsiveness.

80251Is it possible that Intel's new ARC architecture might be more viable in cryptomining than in gaming? At least that would give Intel some road to profitability...