Friday, August 26th 2022
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Allegedly 40% Faster than 5950X in CPU-Z Bench Multi-Threaded
The upcoming AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-core/32-thread processor is allegedly over 40% faster than its predecessor, the 5950X, at the CPU-Z Bench multi-threaded test, according to a leaked benchmark screenshot scored by harukaze5719, and tabulated by Wccftech. The 7950X is shown with a score of 16809 points, which puts it 41 percent faster than the 5950X, and 43% faster than the i9-12900K. It's also shown to be behind the leaked benchmarks of the i9-13900K by a whisker—with the upcoming Intel chip being 0.5% faster.
Source:
Wccftech
112 Comments on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Allegedly 40% Faster than 5950X in CPU-Z Bench Multi-Threaded
8K Gaming On The AMD RX6400 Was Better Than Expected - YouTube Because there are many overzealous ... fans of the red team that think it still makes them look cool. :D
The Sun doesn't rotate around AMD only.
Maybe if you have focused on Intel's threads for Intel's topics suggestions and AMD's threads for AMD's topics and suggestion it would have not brought to attention your attitude towards Intel products people recognize and are kinda tired of.
The 5950x and 7950x are the top notch things. I'm kinda leaning towards the 5800x and 7800x if I were to change something.
I don't need as many cores in my basically gaming rig or some light works and compilations. For crunching data I'd go with something beefier.
Anyway, these presented here are an engineering samples so hard to tell what the final version of the CPU will perform like. I would assume it will be better than that presented here in both cases 7700x and 7950x. How much better? time will tell.
Either way it would seem, AMD has got some power under the hood with the 7000 series CPUs.
"So you are saying that the only scenarios that the extra toy cores are used properly are irrelevant? Does the discourse in defense of intel change according to the positioning of the planets or something? It's funny."
"You don't know where to swim in your word gymnastics, but you ended up in the worst possible scenario, showing how horrible AL mobile is. Even with more cores it still loses out to AMD's octa-cores of the 5xxx generation lol
I don't understand how anyone can brag about a mobile chip not getting the best performance balance with limited TDP. I won't even go into the fact that now the U line has only 2 performance cores."
"The efficiency of intel chips is so bad in TDP limited scenarios that they end up losing to a Hexa-core(5600u) sometimes, not to mention the offboard GPU losing to an AMD iGPU."
EDIT: I should mention that the Intel Partner Program is absolutely monopolistic BS though. But still, if AMD had something decent to offer back then the impact would have been lessened by a large margin. For example, look at 7th gen Core vs 8th gen Core, AMD released Zen between that time and Intel finally had to get off the couch and actually respond to AMDs cheap, efficient, and pretty damn good Zen cores by finally adding more cores to their CPUs. Now that AMD is firing on all cylinders again (Zen4 hype train lets goooooooo) we see Intel having to do some real innovation again in order to keep up.
Real life is not merely about business competition based purely on the strengths of the products.
Real life also consists of empty promises, underhanded business moves, downright illegal tactics, and paid shills and unpaid deluded fanbois.