Monday, July 28th 2025

ASUS Implements Security Updates for MyASUS, Armoury Crate, and Certain Routers
ASUS recognizes recent reports from security researchers concerning potential software issues with MyASUS, Armoury Crate, DriverHub, and certain ASUS router models. All of these issues have been resolved. Users can see here for more information and to download the latest software version. As a member of FIRST, the world's largest cybersecurity incident response organization, and as a partner in the CVE CNA program, an international community-based cybersecurity effort, ASUS is deeply committed to providing the highest level of product experience to our users.
15 Comments on ASUS Implements Security Updates for MyASUS, Armoury Crate, and Certain Routers
It clearly didn't affect people that hadn't enable that feature, as I never had any issues with that, nor did anyone else that didn't have that feature enabled.
I agree that they should stop adding these type of features, as what is being sold as a security feature clearly doesn't deliver.
Also, if you haven't already discovered it, try Merlin's firmware for Asus routers.
Detail - you have been warned - biased - etc ... :
ASUS and security. Having no uefi updates but public known CVE and security issues on amd Chipsets for 3 or 4 weeks on the mainboard I used a month ago.
that does not fit.
I have no issues with ASUS marketing. But ASUS and security marketing is a bit fraudulent in my personal viewpoint with recent purchasable and still can be purchased asus products.
This needs to be told so people are aware of reality vs ASUS marketing. that armory crate will not matter as the uefi itself did not get any newer updates for at least 3 or 4 weeks. The uefi itself was insecure for any, ! any !, operating system out there on asus amd mainboard.
I talk about my
"garbage"lying around ASUS Prime x670-p mainboard. (provided an example - may 2023 - may 2025)see yourself how often an asus mainbaord get an uefi update. Sadly this does not show when.
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12zg6yT_H7H-W1voyw1ZoIrj0GSE7WI4Ug-uLlv-Asa8/edit?gid=937453961#gid=937453961 This is a politics and law problem
I suggest a heavy fine for the end user which has to be paid by the router owner instantly.
More friendly way - the internet service provider get heavy fine for each of those users connected to them when not removed in the next 5 minutes.
We have so much stuff done by the internet service provider, so this does not matter much.
there is no right for internet access. Should be handled the same as with illegal x, or illegal y or harmful z.
I think writing it in more details or going more specific will get me a message warning. Please accept it as it is without details or specifics.
But yes, ISPs should be a lot more proactive against botnets and cut those user off and inform them that their hardware is compromised.
A host interface
Firmware
Nothing else. Fantastic that you can bloat yours routers with gimmick GUI's and functions but obviously at the cost or expensive of other things, security.
Any router i used to use i turn the things i don't need off. And i make sure the router does not see a daylight on the internet hooked, other then a pass through from something being firewalled in the first place.
Yes some routers are directly linked to the internet, with zero firewall, and that is the main cause of problems. Always put something in front of it that blocks 99.9% of incoming connections to begin with.
I'm not trying to defend Asus here, but every tech company out there is affected by problems and Gamers Nexus was late on the ball here, which made it all a bit weird. Well, it seems like Asus needs a better system for pushing updates, but I would say 99% of people are better of having an auto firmware update on their router, than not.
In your honest opinion, how many percentage of consumers update their router firmware regularly (assuming there are available updates)?
If you read the text in Asus routers, you'll also see that they allegedly push out security fixes, regardless of if the auto firmware option is enabled or not, although I'm not quite sure how the can do this for older firmwares, but I don't have enough insight into how their firmware works. I just know it's not that easy to push out such an update on embedded Linux systems like routers, due to how the OS works. For those not aware, the router OS is stored as a compressed image which is extracted to RAM once you power the router on and doesn't run in flash, on most routers. This is also why it takes so long to save the settings, as they have to be written to the flash image, as if they were just "saved", they would be forgotten when the router was rebooted or lost power.