Monday, July 28th 2025

NVIDIA to Debut GeForce RTX 50-series SUPER GPUs by Christmas

NVIDIA is planning to update its GeForce RTX 50-series SUPER line of graphics cards by Christmas 2025, says a report by TweakTown. The company will look to bolster the memory sizes of key performance-segment and high-end graphics card SKUs in a bit to boost their performance in higher resolutions, particularly with ray tracing and neural rendering enabled. In particular, NVIDIA is expected to leverage new 24 Gbit density GDDR7 memory chips that allow it to create memory sizes such as 18 GB over a 192-bit wide memory bus, or 24 GB across a 256-bit wide memory bus. Besides the added memory, NVIDIA is expected to marginally increase shader counts and GPU clock speeds.

The TweakTown article also sheds light on possible specs of the RTX 50-series SUPER lineup. Only the RTX 5070 SUPER sees an increase in SM counts over its non-SUPER predecessor, with the card maxing out the "GB205" silicon, enabling all 50 SM, for 6,400 CUDA cores, 200 Tensor cores, and 50 RT cores. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sees no increase in SM count over the RTX 5070 Ti despite being based on the "GB203" chip that the two share with the RTX 5080, and there being a rather large gap in SM count between the two (70 vs. 84). The RTX 5080 SUPER, much like the RTX 5080, maxes out the "GB203." What the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER and RTX 5080 SUPER have going for them is a 50% increase in memory size to 24 GB. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER holds onto the same 28 Gbps memory speed as RTX 5070 Ti, while the RTX 5080 SUPER gets a marginal increase in speed to 32 Gbps. There are fairly good increases in TGP across the board for the RTX 50-series SUPER.
Source: TweakTown
Add your own comment

49 Comments on NVIDIA to Debut GeForce RTX 50-series SUPER GPUs by Christmas

#26
melkor_unlimited
Broken Processor.. they could have easily given more cores to RTX 5080 and it cost them next to nothing ..
If you consider replacing GB203 with GB202 and reworking the circuit board cost like next to nothing,then pay for it so we other could buy it.

And yes, there is something you would call 5080 Super. But ...
nVidia calls it 5090 D or 5090 DD and sells it for a "little bit more" bucks than 5080.
Posted on Reply
#27
N/A
Can't Nvidia easily make a 5080 Ti out of 75% enabled GB202 18432 Cuda 384 bit. Enough up selling. That's the fourth 10K shader 80 class in a row.
Posted on Reply
#28
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
N/ACan't Nvidia easily make a 5080 Ti out of 75% enabled GB202 18432 Cuda 384 bit. Enough up selling. That's the fourth 10K shader 80 class in a row.
Why on earth would they want to cut GB202 further when they can sell (already cut down) 5090/5090D/5090DDs as fast as they make them, or the $10k RTX 6000s?

I have serious doubts we're ever going to see xx80 Ti again, unless competition returns to the high end. The existing 5080 is faster than anything from the competition, and the 4090/5090 are in a class of their own.

Fingers crossed though, my 3080 Ti is still going strong well into 2025.

But that was a response to the 69/6950XT.

Ada was enough of a jump the the 4080/S was enough to compete vs the 7900XTX, and RDNA4 is strictly a 5070 Ti competitor, so why pay the expense of creating another segment in between 5080/5090?
Posted on Reply
#29
RootinTootinPootin
BwazeExciting times! I wonder how reviewers will be told to spin this upgrade as a worthwhile one...
the more you buy, the more you save..
Posted on Reply
#30
Broken Processor
melkor_unlimitedIf you consider replacing GB203 with GB202 and reworking the circuit board cost like next to nothing,then pay for it so we other could buy it.

And yes, there is something you would call 5080 Super. But ...
nVidia calls it 5090 D or 5090 DD and sells it for a "little bit more" bucks than 5080.
5080 doesn't even max out GB203, So instead of getting a 5080 TI you got a 5090D. No node is 100% yield that's where binning comes in. Why would they give us anything decent for a reasonable price when fanboys can't take there tongue outta there ass to see they are getting shafted.
Posted on Reply
#31
Rover4444
Definitely buying the 5070 Ti super if it comes out at $750.
Posted on Reply
#32
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
Broken Processor5080 doesn't even max out GB203, So instead of getting a 5080 TI you got a 5090D. No node is 100% yield that's where binning comes in. Why would they give us anything decent for a reasonable price when fanboys can't take there tongue outta there ass to see they are getting shafted.
RTX 5080 uses a fully enabled GB203, as has already been pointed out to you. It's 5070 Ti that is cut down.
Posted on Reply
#33
Quicks
Divide OverflowBlackwell continues to underwhelm.
Nvidia has been underwhelming the past 5 years.

No need to innovate when your best competitor AMD is fast asleep.
Posted on Reply
#34
Flawless
CrackongPeople should realize the VRAM scarcity is artificial and only serves the purpose of creating segmentation for SUPER models
do you edit videos? or upload in lightroom 3500 files, 200mb each raw files? it's never enough!
Posted on Reply
#35
Asni
I wish they upgrade the L2 cache on the RTX 5070ti super, 64MB as intended on the GB203 chip.
Posted on Reply
#36
gunishd
But would there be a more powerful 5090 with improved connections and power consumption? Or is that asking the impossible?
Posted on Reply
#38
igormp
Darthgrey5070Ti 24Gb seems like pointless for me, 16Gb should be enough for this GPU, only for AI stuff maybe.
That's exactly why I'm eyeing it. It could handle memory overclocks with ease and achieve a bandwidth higher than my current 3090s with the same VRAM amount, with support for the new data types from ada&blackwell that I'm missing with Ampere.
Posted on Reply
#39
gunishd
I always wondered why super models were so slim, they clearly had a low calorie diet, I guess they cannot handle too much vram and chips.
Posted on Reply
#40
harm9963
Be interesting to see a 5090 Super at some point
Posted on Reply
#41
LastDudeALive
harm9963Be interesting to see a 5090 Super at some point
There would be no logical reason to release one. The 5090 already far outperforms any other GPU, 32GB is incredibly overkill for gaming, and if you want more than 32GB for AI, Nvidia has their professional RTX cards for you.
Posted on Reply
#42
ARF
"The more you spend, the more you buy, the poorer you become" ™ - the green goblin with the black leather jacket.
Posted on Reply
#43
docnorth
HyderzNvidia RTX 5080 SUPER expensive! Incoming
No, no, it's already SUPER EXPENSIVE!:slap:
Posted on Reply
#44
PixelTech
Hmm, higher capacity VRAM chips... means there can be more chips in the same amount of space, higher bandwidth? because more GB per chip?, and could run hotter?
Are there games that benefit greatly to having more VRAM available? Is there a Crisis 3-esk game that has been developed for future hardware with more VRAM that can take advantage of the higher amount?
Posted on Reply
#45
EarthDog
ChomiqThey need a reason to up-sell people on the 5090s.
The gap is yuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge. Either 37% (1440p) or 52% (4K) according to TPU's own review (5080 FE). You can slice both of those in half and have plenty of reasons to upgrade to a 5090, especially at 4K where the 5090 really pulls ahead.
Posted on Reply
#46
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
EarthDogThe gap is yuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge. Either 37% (1440p) or 52% (4K) according to TPU's own review (5080 FE). You can slice both of those in half and have plenty of reasons to upgrade to a 5090, especially at 4K where the 5090 really pulls ahead.
It's particularly attractive for ultrawide high refresh, too. E.g 3440x1440, or the new 4/5K UW.
Posted on Reply
#47
ARF
HyderzNvidia RTX 5080 SUPER expensive! Incoming
nickbaldwin86what no 5090 Super? shame
That can only have a Ti version and only if AMD is competitive.
The halo part can not have a "super" version, because it is already super-duper.
docnorthNo, no, it's already SUPER EXPENSIVE!:slap:
Lack of competition. Imagine if AMD was about to release a 400 mm^2 3nm large Navi to come close or beat it for 899$ or 999$?
Posted on Reply
#48
k0vasz
as a 3060ti owner, there was literally no compelling card from the base 50 series for me: 5060(ti) was just not giving any meaningful performance upgrade, 5070 had not enough RAM, and 5070ti was way too expensive. now, the 5070S would be a perfect fit for me, the only question now is the actual price
Posted on Reply
#49
LastDudeALive
dgianstefaniIt's particularly attractive for ultrawide high refresh, too. E.g 3440x1440, or the new 4/5K UW.
Yeah, my new 3440x1440 pushes past the 12GB of my 4070 Super in some demanding games/settings. Will definitely be looking at these Super cards when it's time to upgrade next year with my tax refund.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jul 29th, 2025 17:47 CDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts