Monday, November 24th 2025

Intel "Nova Lake" NPU 6 Delivers 74 TOPS for Desktop AI PCs

Intel's next-generation "Nova Lake" desktop processor generation will arrive with a 6th-generation Neural Processing Unit (NPU) design. However, we now have preliminary performance details about it thanks to a well-known hardware leaker @jaykihn0 on X. The latest leak indicates that the "Nova Lake-S" desktop configuration will carry an NPU on one of its tiles that deliver 74 TOPS of INT8 performance, which is significantly higher than anything Intel previously shipped in its desktop segment. As of now, Intel ships NPU 3 with "Arrow Lake-S," which came out in 2023 with "Meteor Lake" and offers 11.5 INT8 TOPS. Intel's current highest-performing NPU is the NPU 5 scheduled for "Panther Lake" in early 2026, which will carry up to 50 TOPS for Copilot+ AI PCs.

Intel's decision to upgrade the NPU IP with "Nova Lake" has been known since late last month, when compiler patches confirmed the inclusion of a new NPU 6 in the next-generation desktop chips. However, the exact performance target was unclear until now. Since Intel is enhancing its NPU IP on the same microarchitecture, we can expect the NPU in Nova Lake to have a larger TOPS budget while maintaining software compatibility. This is excellent news for software that incorporated NPU acceleration in previous generations, as the performance improvements will be seamlessly integrated.
Source: @jaykihn0 on X
Add your own comment

24 Comments on Intel "Nova Lake" NPU 6 Delivers 74 TOPS for Desktop AI PCs

#1
Space Lynx
Astronaut
garbage AI shit, x3D cache fo life
Posted on Reply
#2
LastDudeALive
Space Lynxgarbage AI shit, x3D cache fo life e-core bitches
The irony of saying this when AMD was the first company to put an NPU in their products, including desktop products.
Posted on Reply
#3
Space Lynx
Astronaut
LastDudeALiveThe irony of saying this when AMD was the first company to put an NPU in their products, including desktop products.
that's cause they got bored after x3D cache optimizations, they needed something else to do to pass the time
Posted on Reply
#4
RandallFlagg
LastDudeALiveThe irony of saying this when AMD was the first company to put an NPU in their products, including desktop products.
Actually Intel had it in 10th gen mobile parts. They were not called NPUs back then, but it is essentially an early version with the same purpose.

Overview of Gaussian & Neural Accelerator (GNA)

The Gaussian & Neural Accelerator (GNA) is a dedicated engine integrated into Intel's 10th-generation CPUs. It is designed to enhance performance for specific background workloads, particularly those related to artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning tasks.

Key Features of GNA

Purpose and Functionality

  • Background Workloads: GNA is optimized for tasks that run in the background, allowing the main CPU to focus on other processes.
  • AI Performance: It accelerates neural network operations, improving responsiveness in applications that utilize AI, such as image processing and voice recognition.
Posted on Reply
#5
phints
Clown benchmark. Intel is should be doubling performance per watt to beat crApple and AMD with 18A lithography. Instead we get this useless crap.
Posted on Reply
#6
Space Lynx
Astronaut
phintsClown benchmark. Intel is should be doubling performance per watt to beat crApple and AMD with 18A lithography. Instead we get this useless crap.
yeah, that was more what i meant by my comment. nothing against Intel, they are just focusing on the wrong thing imo. no one wants this AI shit. in fact, I can't wait to move to Linux permanently just to get away from it. just waiting on SteamOS to release in early 2026, then i am going to give it a go on my all ryzen 7840u laptop.
Posted on Reply
#7
TumbleGeorge
Space Lynxthat's cause they got bored after x3D cache optimizations, they needed something else to do to pass the time
Hmm, after? AMD first steps target NPU was little after first boom of machine learning.
Posted on Reply
#8
kondamin
I hope they also introduce something that will make it usefull to have locally
Posted on Reply
#9
Space Lynx
Astronaut
TumbleGeorgeHmm, after? AMD first steps target NPU was little after first boom of machine learning.
calm down, i have x3d cache to go play with, too busy gaming at high fps for this convo

:toast:
Posted on Reply
#10
Nhonho
People want cores with high IPC and lots of cache, and Intel insists on spending expensive silicon space on NPUs and dozens of weak cores.

People who want AI processing use dedicated GPUs for that, which are hundreds or thousands of times faster for AI calculations than NPUs.
Posted on Reply
#11
TumbleGeorge
NhonhoPeople who want AI processing use dedicated GPUs for that, which are hundreds or thousands of times faster for AI calculations than NPUs
I feel sorry for them, from next year even poorer people, and those who for other reasons don't want to buy a dGPU, will also have several hundred TOPs, summed up from CPU, iGPU and NPU. Don't these richer people want the poor to be able to have fun like themselves, with machines that have lower power consumption, are lighter without the several-kilogram discrete graphics, and are even quieter?
Posted on Reply
#12
RandallFlagg
NhonhoPeople want cores with high IPC and lots of cache, and Intel insists on spending expensive silicon space on NPUs and dozens of weak cores.

People who want AI processing use dedicated GPUs for that, which are hundreds or thousands of times faster for AI calculations than NPUs.
Nah. dGPUs don't have enough VRAM.

You need like 4 5090s with a $15K build, or you could just pay $1500-$2000 for this.


Posted on Reply
#13
Dr. Dro
Space Lynxthat's cause they got bored after x3D cache optimizations, they needed something else to do to pass the time
It's not that "they got bored", it's that this is how the computer industry is trending and AMD happens to be one of the companies spearheading the AI craze. They actually went as far as branching out entire sub-brands dedicated to AI, such as Ryzen AI, Radeon AI, etc. just to show how earnest they are regarding this "booming market".

We know it's a bubble, but pretty much everyone saying they don't care about AI is using ChatGPT or Gemini online anyways.
RandallFlaggNah. dGPUs don't have enough VRAM.

You need like 4 5090s with a $15K build, or you could just pay $1500-$2000 for this.
It's an unexpected plus of unified memory configurations for models which require more memory capacity than computing speed to iterate, inference and/or train. dGPUs can't really do that without extremely fast, specialized interconnects, since they're a complete system. If we're to give due credit for this type of architecture on a computer though, Apple's 5 years ahead of everyone else.
Posted on Reply
#14
Space Lynx
Astronaut
Dr. DroIt's not that "they got bored", it's that this is how the computer industry is trending and AMD happens to be one of the companies spearheading the AI craze. They actually went as far as branching out entire sub-brands dedicated to AI, such as Ryzen AI, Radeon AI, etc. just to show how earnest they are regarding this "booming market".

We know it's a bubble, but pretty much everyone saying they don't care about AI is using ChatGPT or Gemini online anyways.
ya, i'm mainly just trolling on this thread cause I am bored, and i love my x3D cache, and Intel deserves to be called out on their bs too

i'm aware AI slop is the future regardless of company
Posted on Reply
#15
Philaphlous
The average joe isn't going to know what the heck any of this stuff is. Heck even I don't know what all these "improvements" are... 95% of people buying these will only care about 2 things, 1) how much battery life/power consumption is it and 2) How fast can I browse the internet....
Posted on Reply
#16
Dr. Dro
PhilaphlousThe average joe isn't going to know what the heck any of this stuff is. Heck even I don't know what all these "improvements" are... 95% of people buying these will only care about 2 things, 1) how much battery life/power consumption is it and 2) How fast can I browse the internet....
They don't have to, Microsoft made sure of that. I present to you the "Windows 11 Copilot+ PC" - besides HP has plenty of laptops with Ryzen AI processors at the $1500 range. These sell and and they sell well. After all, Windows 11 is designed for these machines, not for your traditional desktop computer.
Posted on Reply
#17
Sol_Badguy
Uhm maybe they could make the AI NPCs run on the NPU so the CPU cores can mind their business with the destructive environments 'n' shieeet -> moar performance and all that.

I mean after all it's a tool, it could be put to some use if it can actually do something, and based on various apps/benchmarks it seems it can.
So it's up to them (game devs and others) if they can harness its capabilities to enable something superior than before.

But anyway, I think enough/many people expect Nova Lake to be great as a "home user workstation CPU" so this NPU performance news is more in that direction, what people are worried about/unsure of is gaming performance.

Given there will be two CPU breeds apparently, one plain and one with bLLC, we can only guess how they will perform. I would say plain Nova Lake will beat Raptor Lake, I can't see it being worse. There is a chance that they're only equal, although after two gens that would be a disgrace. So modest uplift over Raptor Lake then? And if the bLLC version has strong uplift over plain then it's on! Fist fight with brass knuckles ftw! :nutkick::rockout:
Posted on Reply
#18
RandallFlagg
PhilaphlousThe average joe isn't going to know what the heck any of this stuff is. Heck even I don't know what all these "improvements" are... 95% of people buying these will only care about 2 things, 1) how much battery life/power consumption is it and 2) How fast can I browse the internet....
You can run an LLM AI at home, in complete privacy. And if you haven't run one locally before, it's far more powerful than you think.

On one model I had, a 20B parameter one, I asked it how to make stuffed peppers, Thai curry, described a common engine problem on a 2009 F-150 and asked what it likely was, and write a C# .Net program to use the Dept of Treasury API to download treasury data for the past 10 years into a .csv file.

It didn't miss a beat. All run locally. I have no idea how they crammed such diverse knowledge into something that fits in an 16GB file.

A lot of people are going to be interested in that I think, especially when you consider what AI can do with information about what you look at and search for. The next weave of AIs are going to be able to control your PC too, use the browser and apps on your computer.
Posted on Reply
#19
mrnagant
RandallFlaggYou can run an LLM AI at home, in complete privacy. And if you haven't run one locally before, it's far more powerful than you think.

On one model I had, a 20B parameter one, I asked it how to make stuffed peppers, Thai curry, described a common engine problem on a 2009 F-150 and asked what it likely was, and write a C# .Net program to use the Dept of Treasury API to download treasury data for the past 10 years into a .csv file.

It didn't miss a beat. All run locally. I have no idea how they crammed such diverse knowledge into something that fits in an 16GB file.

A lot of people are going to be interested in that I think, especially when you consider what AI can do with information about what you look at and search for. The next weave of AIs are going to be able to control your PC too, use the browser and apps on your computer.
Just because you run it locally doesn't mean it won't pipe data back to HQ that they will use to improve their product and sell your information. They want this stuff to run locally because it's cheaper for them. Phones are already doing it. CoPilot already does it.

Lot more than just LLMs use NPUs.
Posted on Reply
#20
TumbleGeorge
mrnagantJust because you run it locally doesn't mean it won't pipe data back to HQ that they will use to improve their product and sell your information. They want this stuff to run locally because it's cheaper for them. Phones are already doing it. CoPilot already does it.

Lot more than just LLMs use NPUs.
Locally (when pull out lan cable), LLM will have only data from user storages which is very limited.
Posted on Reply
#21
RandallFlagg
TumbleGeorgeLocally (when pull out lan cable), LLM will have only data from user storages which is very limited.
You guys should really try out a local LLM before spouting off. These are not browsing the web or interacting with a host at all.

There's a lot of interest around these in developer communities, because you can build your own LLM and integrate it into your development environment, instead of paying for one.

lmstudio.ai/
Posted on Reply
#22
kondamin
RandallFlaggYou guys should really try out a local LLM before spouting off. These are not browsing the web or interacting with a host at all.

There's a lot of interest around these in developer communities, because you can build your own LLM and integrate it into your development environment, instead of paying for one.

lmstudio.ai/
That’s nice if you have a fully decked out Mac studio ultra
Posted on Reply
#23
RandallFlagg
kondaminThat’s nice if you have a fully decked out Mac studio ultra
I've run gemini on my 12700K with a 5070 in hybrid mode (part CPU, part GPU) and got ~7 tok/s. I can run it CPU only and get 4+tok/s. A token is roughly a word. To make it productive you might need more sure, but it's quite runnable on mundane hardware.
Posted on Reply
#24
Jayn2
Space Lynxyeah, that was more what i meant by my comment. nothing against Intel, they are just focusing on the wrong thing imo. no one wants this AI shit. in fact, I can't wait to move to Linux permanently just to get away from it. just waiting on SteamOS to release in early 2026, then i am going to give it a go on my all ryzen 7840u laptop.
I believe MSFT pushed the AI on NPU decision. Perhaps we'll eventually find out that it makes a lot of sense if it's running the 1.58 bitnet models.

Anyway, they make Xeon-6 chips with no NPU, so you have a choice.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 14th, 2026 00:48 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts