Tuesday, February 17th 2026

AMD Instinct MI455X Reportedly Facing Delays, Only Low-Volume Production This Year

According to SemiAnalysis, which recently released its InferenceX benchmark comparing the inference performance of the latest AI accelerators, AMD's next-generation Instinct MI455X accelerators, designed to compete with NVIDIA's "Vera Rubin," are facing serious manufacturing difficulties, causing delays in AMD's roadmap execution. Only low-volume production will occur this year, while customers will be generating AI tokens in Q2 2027. This means that NVIDIA's "Vera Rubin" VR200 rack-scale system will be the most powerful system shipping this summer, without competition. As AMD's first rack-scale system, the "Helios" AI rack with the MI455X UALoE72 configuration packs 72 GPUs and 6th Gen AMD EPYC "Venice" CPUs in a heterogeneous system designed to run as a single homogeneous GPU, delivering massive AI performance with multi-ExaFLOP compute output.
SemiAnalysisEngineering samples and low volume production of AMD's first rack scale MI455X UALoE72 system will be in H2 2026 while due to manufacturing delays, the mass production ramp and first production tokens will only be generated on an MI455X UALoE72 by Q2 2027.
Given that it is AMD's first complete rack-scale solution, some manufacturing issues were to be expected, so the company is ironing them out before starting high-volume production. For the Instinct MI455X, AMD claims it will deliver up to 40 FP4 and 20 FP8 PFLOPs, roughly twice the compute performance of the current MI350. The GPUs also transition to HBM4 memory with a 432 GB capacity and get a total bandwidth of 19.6 TB/s. Each GPU provides 300 GB/s of scale-out bandwidth and adds new AI data formats like FP4 and others.
Source: SemiAnalysis
Add your own comment

17 Comments on AMD Instinct MI455X Reportedly Facing Delays, Only Low-Volume Production This Year

#2
Vayra86
I think AMD is the king of low volume at this point in the GPU space lol.

'We only do one GPU'
'We barely make em'

'Oh gosh, lowest market share ever, dafuq'
Posted on Reply
#3
eyenix
Vayra86I think AMD is the king of low volume at this point in the GPU space lol.

'We only do one GPU'
'We barely make em'

'Oh gosh, lowest market share ever, dafuq'
There's nothing funny about your comment. If even the big players are struggling, imagine what future we consumers have.
Posted on Reply
#4
Vayra86
eyenixThere's nothing funny about your comment. If even the big players are struggling, imagine what future we consumers have.
I'm trying to imagine that. Does not compute. Who's struggling for what exactly? Luxury products for people with money to spare while we nuke the planet.

This is great. We need a reality check
Posted on Reply
#5
user556
Vayra86I'm trying to imagine that. Does not compute. Who's struggling for what exactly? Luxury products for people with money to spare while we nuke the planet.
Struggling to get allocation of fabrication lines. There won't be any GPU availability from Nvidia either. Nvidia has booked out TSMC just for its LLM chips.

Reality checks is the last thing on Nvidia's mind.

EDIT: Samsung and Intel will likely be benefiting as some TSMC customers look elsewhere for capacity.
Posted on Reply
#6
kondamin
isn't cerebras by default rack scale
Posted on Reply
#7
TheinsanegamerN
eyenixThere's nothing funny about your comment. If even the big players are struggling, imagine what future we consumers have.
His comment is hilarious. AMD has been screwing around without a concrete plan for years now.


> be AMD> 2012: “check out these 4 TFLOPS, bro”
> software feeds GCN 64-wide waves like trying to fill a swimming pool with a pipette
> Nvidia warps 32-wide, occupancy 100 %, GCN occupancy 12 % on a good day
> “next driver drop will fix it” – still waiting

> 2020: split the baby
> RDNA for gamers, CDNA for people who think π is a personality trait
> RDNA: “we’re competitive at $299!”> CDNA: “we’re competitive at 64-bit!”
> AI kids in the hallway like “can we play?”
> AMD: “this toy is for scientists only, go away”

> 2024: Jensen drops GB200, 72 GPUs in one rack like it’s a bag of Skittles
> AMD still bragging about 8-GPU “scale-up”
> Infinity Fabric so infinite it stops at 8

> ROCm: CUDA’s dollar-store cosplay
> installer breaks gcc, runtime breaks containers, docs break English
> NCCL? we got RCCL, the C stands for “copium”
> every release note: “performance improvements”
> still 3× slower than CUDA on a 1080 Ti
> Jensen uses ROCm slides as toilet paper, flushes, gets better bandwidth than MI300X

> MI300X slides: “192 GB HBM3!”
> bench it on Llama-70B: GPU 0 chills at 3 % while GPUs 1-7 are lost in PCIe topology hell
> NVLink swarms 72 cards like a hive-mind, ROCm can’t even ping the host across two NUMA domains
> MLPerf submission: “we’re focusing on real workloads”
> translation: we finished last and blamed the benchmark

> analyst call: “Lisa, what’s your edge?”
> “Memory bandwidth.”
> entire planet: “bandwidth doesn’t infer if your scheduler is napping”
> she pivots to MI400 shipping 2026
> Jensen already on Rubin, while AMD is still etching FP64 ALUs nobody asked for
> Microsoft buys a pallet of MI300X for Bing Chat
> uses them as paperweights to stop NVDA boxes from sliding off the rack
> Azure docs quietly list them under “specialty VMs – not for actual AI”
> mfw AMD’s next roadmap slide is just a tombstone engraved “but our FLOPS/watt”
> It ain't TEAM RED its TEAM DED

Same company cant consistently release GPUs in every tier, dropps support for all their previous architectures, ends driver support early, ignores consumer feedback, expects companies to just use whatever tech they lay on the floor, and cant figure out why consumers buy more RTX 5060s then the entireity of AMDs lineup.
Posted on Reply
#10
Tomorrow
Vayra86I think AMD is the king of low volume at this point in the GPU space lol.

'We only do one GPU'
'We barely make em'

'Oh gosh, lowest market share ever, dafuq'
What "one GPU"?

RDNA4 is comprised on two separate dies.
And 6 separate SKU's.
And please dont tell me you quote JPR numbers again?

AMD's market share in dGPU's its at around 19%. Not 6% or whatever the latest JPR numbers were.
Posted on Reply
#11
jesdals
Im currently more interested in wether Zen 6 gets lelayed or not - If AMD is able to compete with Nvidia - they should need the release of next gen cores - but its troublesome times
Posted on Reply
#12
user556
jesdalsIm currently more interested in wether Zen 6 gets lelayed or not - If AMD is able to compete with Nvidia - they should need the release of next gen cores - but its troublesome times
That's pretty much a certainty. Anything that uses latest processes at TSMC will be pushed aside by Nvidia buying out the capacity at hugely inflated pricing.

It'll be particularly bad for stacked die products, like 3D Vcache, and interposer products, since the complex packaging lines are even more constrained than the fabrication lines.
Posted on Reply
#15
evernessince
TheinsanegamerNAnd it wouldnt be an AMD thread without you malding about people poking fun at AMD. Welcome Home!
The other user was pointing out the dangers of competitors not being able to get supply:
There's nothing funny about your comment. If even the big players are struggling, imagine what future we consumers have.
You are trying to make something brand political when it wasn't. Guy doesn't even mention AMD.
Vayra86I'm trying to imagine that. Does not compute. Who's struggling for what exactly? Luxury products for people with money to spare while we nuke the planet.

This is great. We need a reality check
Consider that if it's everyone but the big players having issues, the primary reality check will be that at the end you are left with even less competition than you have now.

This would only be great if it applied across the board. A smaller competitor not being able to get enough wafers to produce their product because it's being eaten by the big guys will only further cement market leaders.

I understand that people are upset at AI right now but you don't want the GPU or other markets to further consolidate (or for token competitors to be so far behind they are kept around merely for appearances).
Posted on Reply
#16
Vayra86
evernessinceThe other user was pointing out the dangers of competitors not being able to get supply:



You are trying to make something brand political when it wasn't. Guy doesn't even mention AMD.



Consider that if it's everyone but the big players having issues, the primary reality check will be that at the end you are left with even less competition than you have now.

This would only be great if it applied across the board. A smaller competitor not being able to get enough wafers to produce their product because it's being eaten by the big guys will only further cement market leaders.

I understand that people are upset at AI right now but you don't want the GPU or other markets to further consolidate (or for token competitors to be so far behind they are kept around merely for appearances).
GPU consolidation?

We just gained a third player, consolidation among AIBs is completely irrelevant, as Nvidia and AMD have shown us each on their own merit.
There is also China.

There is a LOT of movement and I think nobody buying GPUs wants to buy them all from Nvidia. It leads to tunnel vision, and kills innovation, in a segment and industries where innovation is the only driver for progress. That won't mix, it won't last and history has also underlined this time and time again: design wins keep coming, from more companies than just Nvidia.

Increased demand does not lead to consolidation, it leads to a more vibrant marketplace. Chip development is like a fruit tree that keeps on giving because we want more and more of it, and as a result, it will also diversify and spawn new opportunities.

Zoom out beyond the current transitional period and you can see we've only gained more of everything.
Posted on Reply
#17
eyenix
We can say that AMD has denied the rumors of "semyanalisys" who apparently are famous for throwing mud at AMD without any basis.
MI455X is due H2 2026 as expected, no delays. Fake news.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 12th, 2026 22:37 PST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts