Thursday, April 2nd 2026

Ubuntu 26.04 LTS Raises Recommended Memory Requirement to 6 GB

Canonical increased the recommended system memory for the upcoming Ubuntu 26.04 LTS "Resolute Raccoon" to 6 GB of RAM, a first major change since 2018. According to the release note, the 26.04 LTS now lists 6 GB of RAM as the baseline for a comfortable desktop experience, alongside a 2 GHz dual-core CPU and 25 GB of storage, unchanged from previous generations. This represents a 50% increase over Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, which in 2018 raised the bar to 4 GB, and a notable shift from earlier releases that ran on as little as 1 GB. The change is not caused by a heavier core OS. Instead, it reflects the reality of modern workloads. The GNOME desktop, now updated to newer revisions, along with current web browsers (i.e., Firefox) and everyday apps like LibreOffice, demand more memory in multitasking scenarios.

Importantly, 6 GB is not a hard requirement. Ubuntu 26.04 LTS will still install on systems with less than 6 GB of RAM. However, performance may suffer. Early testing shows that the OS remains functional even on 2 GB systems although with significant slowdowns. As before, the 25 GB storage requirement remains mandatory for the desktop edition. As Ubuntu 26.04 LTS is expected to be the next long-term support release from Canonical, the Ubuntu ecosystem provides many options for those using lower-end hardware. Lighter flavors such as the official Lubuntu or the Linux Lite distro, and manual installations with a minimal base remain available and viable options. Also, Ubuntu Server can be deployed on systems with around 1-1.5 GB of RAM, depending on the use case. Ubuntu 26.04 LTS is currently in development and scheduled to be released on April 23.
Sources: Ubuntu release notes, OMG Ubuntu
Add your own comment

56 Comments on Ubuntu 26.04 LTS Raises Recommended Memory Requirement to 6 GB

#51
lexluthermiester
RJARRRPCGPUnless you have an X58 system. (3x2GB DDR3)
Or you have odd kits installed. 2x2GB+2x1GB for example.
Posted on Reply
#52
MCJAxolotl7
_roman_yes: when i look at the entry level arm notebook which costs around 800 us dollar and has 8gib dram for everything with arm.
yes: when i look at my windows 11 pro refurbished notebook which uses some dram for the graphics with ryzen 4650u.

yes 8gib dram is most likely the minium standard: when you claim bare minimum standards you have to assume cheap components. a hdd, not a ssd, not a sata ssd, no dedicated graphic card but cpu graphics. in the worst case quite high resolution 27" whqd screen with cpu graphics. www-clients may need 2gib dram itself also which usually is a core component.

i wonder what mistake i made that my started x server wiht a temrinall needs now around 530mb dram and not 130mb as it used to.

edit: i just made my backup with the gentoo live cd.

kded6 process is running. it seems kde. htop claims to need 2.05G of DRAM. it also looks like systemd. i do not want an user desktop to wrongly notify me that my samsung hdd is failing. no it is not. i use it for downloads, just because a few sectors are dead and smart is wrong, does not change the fact kde contains features which makes it bloated.

my i3wm which i just warm booted needs 550MB

that is a factor ~4 of dram usage just because you want windows 95 style with kde.
kde is bloated and the qt kit which it is made from is also bloated.

the real question is: Which out of the box experience has teh fewest dram usage with cpu graphics from which livecd / installer cd with a graphic desktop environment? Which one with the windows 95 style?
The point is that even with i3wm, it would require you to meticulously manage what windows you have open just to not constantly be swapping to a probably terrible storage device, based on having 4 gbs of ram.
Posted on Reply
#53
unwind-protect
MCJAxolotl7The point is that even with i3wm, it would require you to meticulously manage what windows you have open just to not constantly be swapping to a probably terrible storage device, based on having 4 gbs of ram.
What's a "window"?
Posted on Reply
#54
_roman_
not sure what it was implied

i use since suse 6.2 virtual desktops.

applications = winodws = e.g. vlc = e.g. gimp = www-client/vivaldi are on one of those 10 virtual desktops. i do use sometimes up to 6 or 8 different application tiles on my 27" whqd single virtual desktop

a reddit user claimed a few hours ago still using 100mb for a xserver session. i also had for yearr 150mb for a full x-server. where the dram is wasted is an interesting question but with 2x32gib hynix a die it does not matter.

the core point still is, qt and kde and systemd bloats up a box with 4 times as much, see above, as my openrc gnu gentoo linux installation from 2006. i did not tweak for low memory footprint. dram is heavily utilised for several tasks. i would not use mate terminal but st terminal instead. and so on. same for the notification bar, etc. st terminal has it benefits for certain use cases. mate is also bloated

low memory footprint means to get rid of qt, kde, systemd.

references: st.suckless.org
Posted on Reply
#55
RJARRRPCGP
In December, 2020, the X58 build got upgraded to 12 GB. (3x4GB)
Posted on Reply
#56
enb141
RJARRRPCGPUnless you have an X58 system. (3x2GB DDR3)
I mean that 6 GB is what they recommend so in virtualized you can set it up to 6 GB, and use the rest for Windows.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 15th, 2026 16:37 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts