Monday, August 24th 2026

Samsung Confirms HBM4E Memory Running at 16 Gbps Per Pin

At the Hot Chips 2026 conference's Advance Program, Samsung's Sangwook Han confirmed that the company is preparing to ship HBM4E memory with speeds of 16 Gbps per pin. This is a significant confidence boost for Samsung's Semiconductor division, which has been shipping HBM4E with speeds of 14 Gbps per pin since late May of this year. Essentially, the company confirmed that its scaling progress is going well, and HBM4E represents another milestone in high-bandwidth memory technology that it can produce with impressive speed. Samsung's own HBM4 is now shipping at 11.7 Gbps, making the jump to HBM4E even more impressive.

Currently, at 14 Gbps per pin and 2,048 pins per HBM4E stack, Samsung can achieve a maximum bandwidth of 3.6 TB/s. However, at 16 Gbps, this maximum memory bandwidth will increase to 4 TB/s for a single HBM4E stack. Considering about a dozen memory stacks per AI accelerator or GPU, the total memory bandwidth is remarkable. The company is also currently offering this memory in a 12-layer (or 12-high) configuration with a memory density of 48 GB per stack. However, customer requirements will also include 8-layer 32 GB and 16-layer 64 GB stacks in the future.
Regarding the technology, Samsung uses a 6th-generation 10 nm class process optimized for DRAM, which is then stacked across multiple layers. HBM4E technology also includes a custom base die manufactured on Samsung's 4 nm SF4 node, designed to meet customer needs for better integration across various packages.
Source: via Jukan on X
Add your own comment

10 Comments on Samsung Confirms HBM4E Memory Running at 16 Gbps Per Pin

#1
RejZoR
Awesome, we're going to see this on consumer graphic cards around year 2041...
Posted on Reply
#2
kondamin
I hope for those still around by then that dGPUs will no longer be a thing and igpus will be more than enough to deal with what ever gta 7 and half life 3 will require.
Posted on Reply
#3
notoperable
Wunderbar! Now what is the consumer take-away?
Schadenfreude!
Posted on Reply
#4
Bwaze
notoperableWunderbar! Now what is the consumer take-away?
Schadenfreude!
Posted on Reply
#5
RejZoR
kondaminI hope for those still around by then that dGPUs will no longer be a thing and igpus will be more than enough to deal with what ever gta 7 and half life 3 will require.
Wishful thinking. The corporate bozos are hoping we'll all be streaming games through their subscription streaming gaming services
Posted on Reply
#6
Philaphlous
Number of DQ's? Dairy Queens? Mmmmmmmm
Posted on Reply
#7
PowerBuilder
I hope they increase the production of JEDEC-standard normal packages rather than non-recyclable custom HBMs. Samsung is passive in reinvesting into domestic and international social contributions—a figure that is woefully inadequate compared to the profits it derives from society. Do these internal reserves belong to the U.S. america, or to whom? Samsung is a company that grew by receiving U.S. america aid materials for free and selling them to Korean citizens at high prices. Furthermore, Samsung's factories in other countries only cause environmental pollution and do not provide significant benefits to the local people. Is there any hope for Samsung, a capital monster?
Posted on Reply
#8
kondamin
PhilaphlousNumber of DQ's? Dairy Queens? Mmmmmmmm
Data queue, double the connections with higher bandwidth per channel
RejZoRWishful thinking. The corporate bozos are hoping we'll all be streaming games through their subscription streaming gaming services
why would they want to host all that crap when they can make you rent the game and buy the crap that costs energy and deprecates?
8K isn't going to be a thing, 2x 4k for VR maybe
Posted on Reply
#9
TheEndIsNear
Old people like me look at the number per pin and just go how lol
Posted on Reply
#10
kondamin
PowerBuilderI hope they increase the production of JEDEC-standard normal packages rather than non-recyclable custom HBMs. Samsung is passive in reinvesting into domestic and international social contributions—a figure that is woefully inadequate compared to the profits it derives from society. Do these internal reserves belong to the U.S. america, or to whom? Samsung is a company that grew by receiving U.S. america aid materials for free and selling them to Korean citizens at high prices. Furthermore, Samsung's factories in other countries only cause environmental pollution and do not provide significant benefits to the local people. Is there any hope for Samsung, a capital monster?
They give employment to people who otherwise would move out of the country to get employment in a very specialised field they studied.
They will gain know how on running this level of technology and will be able to copy it on their own in the host nation.
Posted on Reply
Nov 12th, 2026 04:40 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts