Wednesday, September 30th 2026

Micron Reports Record Fiscal Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year 2026 Results

Micron Technology, Inc. (Nasdaq: MU) today announced results for its fourth quarter and full year of fiscal 2026, which ended September 3, 2026.

Fiscal Q4 2026 Highlights
  • Revenue of $54.23 billion versus $41.46 billion for the prior quarter and $11.32 billion for the same period last year
  • GAAP net income of $37.70 billion, or $32.87 per diluted share
  • Non-GAAP net income of $38.40 billion, or $33.42 per diluted share
  • Operating cash flow of $43.97 billion versus $25.39 billion for the prior quarter and $5.73 billion for the same period last year
Fiscal 2026 Highlights
  • Revenue of $133.19 billion versus $37.38 billion for the prior year
  • GAAP net income of $84.97 billion, or $74.33 per diluted share
  • Non-GAAP net income of $86.76 billion, or $75.52 per diluted share
  • Operating cash flow of $89.68 billion versus $17.53 billion for the prior year
Sanjay Mehrotra, Chairman and CEO of Micron Technology"Micron delivered record fiscal 2026 results, and we expect an even stronger fiscal 2027. AI is becoming Super Intelligence (SI), and memory enhances this intelligence and the competitiveness of our customers' platforms. We are increasing our investments in technology, products and manufacturing to help drive SI forward with our customers, and our Strategic Customer Agreements provide added confidence in the durability of Micron's financial performance."
Investments in capital expenditures, net were $10.77 billion for the fourth quarter of 2026 and $27.37 billion for the full year of 2026. Adjusted free cash flow was $33.20 billion for the fourth quarter of 2026 and $62.31 billion for the full year of 2026. Micron ended the year with cash, marketable investments, and restricted cash of $73.48 billion. On September 30, 2026, Micron's Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share, payable in cash on October 29, 2026, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on October 14, 2026.
Product Highlights
  • We began sampling the industry's first 512 GB ultra dense high-capacity DDR5 RDIMM modules capable of speeds up to 9,200 MT/s.
  • We have completed multiple customer qualifications of our 1-gamma based, 8,800 MT/s high-speed server RDIMM modules.
  • Our industry leading server LPDDR SOCAMM portfolio revenue more than doubled sequentially in the fourth quarter of 2026.
  • Our 7600 PCIe Gen 5 and 9650 PCIe Gen 6 SSD high-performance products are now shipping to market-leading customers for KV-cache applications.
  • Our 6600 ION SSD achieved a strong volume ramp in the fourth quarter of 2026.
  • We are now shipping 6-channel 1-gamma LPDDR5X for flagship mobile devices.
  • We have secured design wins with every Tier 1 OEM customer for AI workstation product.
  • Our 4600 SSD secured additional qualifications with leading PC OEMs.
  • We began sampling 1-gamma based LPDDR6 products to multiple physical AI markets.
Source: Micron
Add your own comment

19 Comments on Micron Reports Record Fiscal Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year 2026 Results

#1
Athena
Even with those kind of numbers, it's still not enough to make a new Fab from the ground up...
Posted on Reply
#2
Hecate91
An 87% margin, wow that's nuts, but I'll remember how they dropped the consumer market like trash if they come crawling back, well if the AI bubble pops.
Posted on Reply
#3
RejZoR
Hecate91An 87% margin, wow that's nuts, but I'll remember how they dropped the consumer market like trash if they come crawling back, well if the AI bubble pops.
Me too. And I keep reminding people to remember how they instantly dropped consumers in chase of sweet sweet enterprise money. It's a shame most people have a memory of a gold fish and don't hold a grudge against greedy companies. But I absolutely will.
Posted on Reply
#5
Panther_Seraphin
AthenaEven with those kind of numbers, it's still not enough to make a new Fab from the ground up...
Oh there 100% is money for a new fab, they dont want to ever go back to the days of only 10-20% margins
Posted on Reply
#6
LittleBro
Data center gross margin up from 41% (2025) to 90% (2026), revenue increased 11.5-times more Y/Y
Mobile and client gross margin up from 36% (2025) to 90% (2026), revenue increased 3.5-times more Y/Y
Automotive and embedded gross margin up from 31% (2025) to 84% (2026), revenue increased 4.75-times more Y/Y

Revenue overall increase Y/Y by 256%

But, yeah, there's a scarcity ...
There's a scarcity, FFS!
Everything is in stock. (SSDs, memory cards, USB flash drives, DDR4/DDR5 memory)
But there's still a scarcity despite everything being in stock in good amounts!

It's just fuckin' expensive.
Why?
Just look at those margins.
And this is just one member of the memory cartel trio.

Market panic caused by OpenAI and cooperated with memory cartel surely does it's job.

But some people just love being played, so yeah, oficially, it's chip crisis due to scarcity.
Posted on Reply
#7
A&P211
Hecate91An 87% margin, wow that's nuts, but I'll remember how they dropped the consumer market like trash if they come crawling back, well if the AI bubble pops.
If or when the AI bubbles pops its going to reset the US economy.
Posted on Reply
#8
Panther_Seraphin
A&P211If or when the AI bubbles pops its going to reset the US World economy.
So many Western countries are focusing on AI at the moment its scary
Posted on Reply
#9
Hecate91
A&P211If or when the AI bubbles pops its going to reset the US economy.
www.thenationalnews.com/future/technology/2026/09/29/ai-industry-needs-to-earn-6-trillion-by-2031-to-justify-data-centres/
AI would need to have $6 trillion in profit by 2031 to justify the rate at companies are spending on datacenters. The current bubble doesn't seem sustainable, and I'd rather the reset happen sooner than later, the AI tech bros and companies involved would probably get a bailout anyway.
Posted on Reply
#10
JustBenching
RejZoRMe too. And I keep reminding people to remember how they instantly dropped consumers in chase of sweet sweet enterprise money. It's a shame most people have a memory of a gold fish and don't hold a grudge against greedy companies. But I absolutely will.
Why would you hold a grudge? Micron dropped us the same way we would drop micron if we found memory cheaper from another company. I care about my bottom line and micro cares about theirs, seems fair.
LittleBroData center gross margin up from 41% (2025) to 90% (2026), revenue increased 11.5-times more Y/Y
Mobile and client gross margin up from 36% (2025) to 90% (2026), revenue increased 3.5-times more Y/Y
Automotive and embedded gross margin up from 31% (2025) to 84% (2026), revenue increased 4.75-times more Y/Y

Revenue overall increase Y/Y by 256%

But, yeah, there's a scarcity ...
There's a scarcity, FFS!
Everything is in stock. (SSDs, memory cards, USB flash drives, DDR4/DDR5 memory)
But there's still a scarcity despite everything being in stock in good amounts!

It's just fuckin' expensive.
Why?
Just look at those margins.
And this is just one member of the memory cartel trio.

Market panic caused by OpenAI and cooperated with memory cartel surely does it's job.

But some people just love being played, so yeah, oficially, it's chip crisis due to scarcity.
That's the definition of scarcity. Prices go up until people stop buying hence there is stock.
Posted on Reply
#11
RejZoR
JustBenchingWhy would you hold a grudge? Micron dropped us the same way we would drop micron if we found memory cheaper from another company. I care about my bottom line and micro cares about theirs, seems fair.


That's the definition of scarcity. Prices go up until people stop buying hence there is stock.
I valued Crucial for reliability even if it was sometimes more expensive. They dropped us the moment they smelled more profits. So, yeah, fuck them. We're not the same.
Posted on Reply
#12
JustBenching
RejZoRI valued Crucial for reliability even if it was sometimes more expensive. They dropped us the moment they smelled more profits. So, yeah, fuck them. We're not the same.
How much more expensive? Would you pay double? Triple? Of course not, you would drop them like a hot potato. Just like micron did when they were offered triple the money for Ai than what you were willing to pay.
Posted on Reply
#13
Hecate91
RejZoRI valued Crucial for reliability even if it was sometimes more expensive. They dropped us the moment they smelled more profits. So, yeah, fuck them. We're not the same.
Yeah, I never had an issue with Crucial ram or SSD's, they had a nice tool for quickly finding compatible memory for OEM systems also. Yet Micron decided to chase the hype train for quarterly gains instead of thinking about the long term.
Posted on Reply
#14
Red Hood
DRAM prices increased several times due to illegal price fixing and micron's revenue also increased several times, what a surprise

Their tax breaks are still subsidised by the tax payer cause obviously they are really struggling to make profit with such low margins
Posted on Reply
#15
LittleBro
JustBenchingThat's the definition of scarcity. Prices go up until people stop buying hence there is stock.
Scarcity is about permanent/infinite demand for goods with limited availability (due to limited means of obtaining or producing them) which results in high price of goods.
This is by nature. Gold, for example, it's limited in availability, you can't make it synthetically. Or drinkable water is scarce. Everyone wants it, though not everyone has easy access to it.

Current memory chips crisis, often referred to as "scarcity" or "shortage", is not a permanent thing and definitely not caused by natural means.
Prices are way too much inflated despite the low demand. Also, demand gets even lower as prices get higher.
(I'm talking about demand for DYI hardware that cannot be repurposed for AI data centers.
DDR4/5 kits, flash drives, memory cards ... are not really required for AI accelerators to work.)

It can be tracked directly to Open AI's statement from October 2025.
AI datacenters were already built and new were being built at that time, AI accelerators were already a thing back then.
(OpenGPT was handled to public in late 2022, version 4 in 2023. Copilot in early 2023, Gemini in late 2023. Blackwell accelerators were introduced in 2024.)
Micron, Samsung and SK hynix, all three raised priced (even for already produced goods) at the same time and used OpenAI's non-binding agreement as excuse.
This underlines statement about this being a coortinated action - a cartel action. Words like "scarcity" and/or "shortage" due to extreme AI demand are used as smoke screen.

In a healthy market, when there is huge demand for goods, manufacturers rush to increase production to sell goods at high prices caused by increased demand.
This eventually satisfies the demand and prices stabilize, but they still make a lot of money by selling goods at prices created by extreme demand, so in the end it's worth it.

Unfortunately for us, we're living in a manipulated market and Micron's fiscal reports aligns perfectly with OpenAI's non-binding agreement.



Take a look at Revenue vs Cost of goods sold (money made by selling goods vs money required to produce them).
While production expenses were actually flat (+10% YoY increase), YoY revenue increase is jawdropping 257%.

This is from previous fiscal year 2025:



Posted on Reply
#16
JustBenching
LittleBroScarcity is about permanent/infinite demand for goods with limited availability (due to limited means of obtaining or producing them) which results in high price of goods.
This is by nature. Gold, for example, it's limited in availability, you can't make it synthetically. Or drinkable water is scarce. Everyone wants it, though not everyone has easy access to it.

Current memory chips crisis, often referred to as "scarcity" or "shortage", is not a permanent thing and definitely not caused by natural means.
Prices are way too much inflated despite the low demand. Also, demand gets even lower as prices get higher.
(I'm talking about demand for DYI hardware that cannot be repurposed for AI data centers.
DDR4/5 kits, flash drives, memory cards ... are not really required for AI accelerators to work.)

It can be tracked directly to Open AI's statement from October 2025.
AI datacenters were already built and new were being built at that time, AI accelerators were already a thing back then.
(OpenGPT was handled to public in late 2022, version 4 in 2023. Copilot in early 2023, Gemini in late 2023. Blackwell accelerators were introduced in 2024.)
Micron, Samsung and SK hynix, all three raised priced (even for already produced goods) at the same time and used OpenAI's non-binding agreement as excuse.
This underlines statement about this being a coortinated action - a cartel action. Words like "scarcity" and/or "shortage" due to extreme AI demand are used as smoke screen.

In a healthy market, when there is huge demand for goods, manufacturers rush to increase production to sell goods at high prices caused by increased demand.
This eventually satisfies the demand and prices stabilize, but they still make a lot of money by selling goods at prices created by extreme demand, so in the end it's worth it.

Unfortunately for us, we're living in a manipulated market and Micron's fiscal reports aligns perfectly with OpenAI's non-binding agreement.



Take a look at Revenue vs Cost of goods sold (money the made by selling goods vs money the required to produce them).
While production expenses were actually flat (+10% YoY increase), YoY revenue increase is jawdropping 257%.

This is from previous fiscal year 2025:



Huh? If production has shifted towards enterprise and Ai that naturally means there is less supply for DIY, phones tablets laptops and the likes, hence the price increase.
Posted on Reply
#17
Athena
Panther_SeraphinOh there 100% is money for a new fab, they dont want to ever go back to the days of only 10-20% margins
You can see what they are making...

the Idaho expansion is $50B
the NY Fab expansion is $100B for phase 1 and that won't come online until 2029/2030
then they are adding 3 more Fabs at that location, but these are like '34, '37, '41 away, so when all this is done, we are talking $600B-$1T in investments

so they aren't sitting on their hands, and of course they want high margins, all businesses do
Normally this will work itself out, but we got such a huge data center hording issue, it's not funny
Posted on Reply
#18
Vya Domus
AthenaEven with those kind of numbers, it's still not enough to make a new Fab from the ground up...
Having fabs is a massive liability, they almost ruined Intel, all of these companies would rather pay an exorbitant amount of money in exchange for wafers than pay an exorbitant amount of money in exchange for a fab that might never give them any functioning wafers.
Posted on Reply
#19
Athena
Vya DomusHaving fabs is a massive liability, they almost ruined Intel, all of these companies would rather pay an exorbitant amount of money in exchange for wafers than pay an exorbitant amount of money in exchange for a fab that might never give them any functioning wafers.
exactly, it's like people can't comprehend this

if Fabs didn't cost so much, it would be a completely different story, but, it's such a massive gamble, and it could end the company if the call is wrong, that is why this is so high-stakes
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 12th, 2026 21:11 PST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts