Monday, October 26th 2026

Intel "Raptor Lake Next" 16-Core and 20-Core CPUs Surface

Intel is actively planning the "Raptor Lake Next" chips as an update to its Socket LGA-1700 desktop processors. These chips are essential for PC buyers who are limited to the decade-old DDR4 memory standard due to the high prices of DDR5 memory, especially since the current Core Ultra "Arrow Lake" processors do not support DDR4. Today, two "Raptor Lake Next" chips have appeared in shipping manifests, which usually indicate that the CPUs are being shipped as samples to customers or as part of a production run returning to Intel, suggesting a nearby launch. Four SKUs have been identified, labeled 99DLMV, 99DLMT, 99DLMW, and 99DLMX.

However, we have details on only two models, 99DLMV and 99DLMT. The 99DLMV is a 16-core design with 8 P-Cores and 8 E-Cores, a clock speed of 3.5 GHz, 30 MB of CPU cache, and a TDP of up to 125 W. The 99DLMT is a 20-core SKU with 8 P-Cores and 12 E-Cores, running at 2.1 GHz, with a CPU cache capacity of 33 MB, and a TDP of 65 W. These leaked models align with previous rumors, such as the one suggesting that Intel plans to replace the Core i5-14600K with a new "Raptor Lake Next" chip featuring 8 P-Cores and 8 E-Cores. Therefore, the 99DLMV SKU might be the one previously speculated about.
Additionally, GIGABYTE has released BIOS updates to prepare its entire Intel B760 and H610 motherboard lineup for upcoming LGA1700 processors, which the company expects to launch in early 2027. We can anticipate these "Raptor Lake Next" CPUs to launch either before the "Nova Lake" and new LGA1954 platform, or at the same time, as an alternative to the new CPU generation. Laptop "Raptor Lake Next" chips are expected to carry Core 2000HX series branding, but desktop variants now remain mysterious.
Sources: Club386, via VideoCardz
Add your own comment

130 Comments on Intel "Raptor Lake Next" 16-Core and 20-Core CPUs Surface

#1
DAPUNISHER
Maybe 5.3-5.6GHz boost clocks? If the price is right these will sell well.
Posted on Reply
#3
ZoneDymo
DAPUNISHERMaybe 5.3-5.6GHz boost clocks? If the price is right these will sell well.
You think so? because...idk for who, doubt many want to build a new system now withh the prices what they are.
Doubt people who have a DDR4 system get that much of an upgrade from these.

I think this is a rather pointless release.
Posted on Reply
#4
ThomasK
AleksandarKLaptop "Raptor Lake Next" chips are expected to carry Core 2000HX series branding, but desktop variants now remain mysterious.
Is the whole rebranding really necessary? Has Intel learned nothing from its recent history, in regards to deceiving its customers?
Posted on Reply
#5
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
ThomasKIs the whole rebranding really necessary? Has Intel learned nothing from its recent history, in regards to deceiving its customers?
What part of the product being called "Raptor Lake Next" is deceiving?

Core count wise this seems to be a 13700 and 14700K. Likely being sold as i5/i7. So pretty nice if for i5 prices you can get a new production 13700K compatible with DDR4/5.
Posted on Reply
#6
wNotyarD
dgianstefaniWhat part of the product being called "Raptor Lake Next" is deceiving?
As far as I'm aware, there's no product name/model numbers mentioned in the article, just their SKU's. Let's leave the discussion about it to when they're properly announced.
Posted on Reply
#7
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
wNotyarDAs far as I'm aware, there's no product name/model numbers mentioned in the article, just their SKU's. Let's leave the discussion about it to when they're properly announced.
Sure. Series, not product.
Posted on Reply
#8
Hecate91
ThomasKIs the whole rebranding really necessary? Has Intel learned nothing from its recent history, in regards to deceiving its customers?
Agreed, the fact Intel is labeling some of these, on the mobile chips at least as "core 200" parts is a disingenuous move to label old 13th/14th gen parts as new.
Intel just needs to sell Bartlett Lake parts on consumer desktop, no need for these extra SKUs.
Posted on Reply
#9
kazuviking
Might replace my 13850hx es with the re-branded 14700K or 14900K if on sale as buying NVL is suicide with the ram prices.
Posted on Reply
#10
wNotyarD
A question of mine with the launch of RPL-Next: will the motherboard vendors launch new DDR4 Z790 models? Because right now they're unobtainium in my local market.
Yes, there's B760, but then IO and build quality quite often goes questionable.
Posted on Reply
#11
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
wNotyarDA question of mine with the launch of RPL-Next: will the motherboard vendors launch new DDR4 Z790 models? Because right now they're unobtainium in my local market.
Yes, there's B760, but then IO and build quality quite often goes questionable.
You'd think refresh boards at least, maybe with updated networking/IO, given how having to buy a DDR5 board would make this series pointless, since if you're buying both CPU/mobo and have DDR5 or plan to buy it, why not buy Arrow Lake, Nova Lake or Zen 4/5/6. Arrow Lake Plus CPUs are especially cheap, with the only caveat being DDR5 only.

Maybe this is primarily for cheap laptops and prebuilts, that's the logical alternative.
Posted on Reply
#12
ThomasK
dgianstefaniWhat part of the product being called "Raptor Lake Next" is deceiving?
Other than it being the same thing as the original RL, with just maybe a different core layout?

Intel refreshed Arrow Lake, and that had many more underlying changes than Raptor Lake will have, so it fit within the original naming scheme, only with a Plus added to it.

Refreshing an old product and giving it a new name seems deceiving, especially to the uninformed customer. If AMD dared to call the reheated 5800X3D anything other than its original name, you’d be the first one to show up in the comments to criticize.
Posted on Reply
#13
_roman_
I personally see it as FRAUD and not a 16 CORE CPU. These are low value 8 Core CPUs with a trash co processor with useless features. Most of my Software still can not handle many cores, no Software can handle those mixed cores. Why should I buy a CPU which cpu instruction set I have to set to year 2005 to get it in a working state?

Android Tactics may work on Android Smartphone field very well with Octa Cores and DRAM when the consumers are the average joe.

The last 30 times i checked intel webpage they changed their specifications in months and they are unable to provide all cpu features in any point of time. they also remove cpu instructions on the fly. intel cpus get massively slower after reviews because of various firmware updates and CVE.

That is retro computing: Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/236799/intel-core-i5-processor-14600k-24m-cache-up-to-5-30-ghz/specifications.html

According to Intel all cores only support, Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, that is for sure 100% false.

What a nonsense:
Intel® 64 ‡
Yes

was it not called amd64 for years?
All information provided is subject to change at any time, without notice. Intel may make changes to manufacturing life cycle, specifications, and product descriptions at any time, without notice. The information herein is provided "as-is" and Intel does not make any representations or warranties whatsoever regarding accuracy of the information, nor on the product features, availability, functionality, or compatibility of the products listed. Please contact system vendor for more information on specific products or systems.
Which Intel does silently, I argue about the INTEL spec and somoene else pulls a INTEL spec which is a few intel months later.


The biggest INTEL Joke is, they call it specificiations. I do not see a lot of specifications there.
www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/236799/intel-core-i5-processor-14600k-24m-cache-up-to-5-30-ghz/specifications.html

The so called intel specificiations, which can change silently over the time:
PCI Express Revision
5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express Configurations ‡
Up to 1x16+4, 2x8+4

Okay, the PCIE Configurations, no word about Lanes, are those PCIE 1.0 Lanes? yes?
Up to 1x16+4, 2x8+4? Or are all PCIE 5.0 Lanes?
Posted on Reply
#14
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
ThomasKOther than it being the same thing as the original RL, with just maybe a different core layout?
So, same as 14th gen Raptor Lake Refresh that bumped i7 from 8 to 12 E cores and increased frequencies from 13th gen.
ThomasKIntel refreshed Arrow Lake, and that had many more underlying changes than Raptor Lake will have, so it fit within the original naming scheme, only with a Plus added to it.
250K/270K plus incorporated 200S boost (higher internal frequencies), bumped cores from 6+8 and 8+8 to 6+12 and 8+16 of 245K/285K, and introduced APO, software binary optimization to leverage new architecture changes that older games weren't compiled/optimized for, on a per-game basis.

Raptor Lake Refresh (14th gen) gave one SKU (14700K) more cores, and bumped frequencies across the board. Non K SKUs remained based on 12th gen Alder Lake arch.

This "Raptor Lake Next" seems to do another core bump for the tiers, and likely has frequency changes. So it "fits within the naming scheme, only with a next added to it".

All three of these examples are similar, more cores, more frequency, some software optimization. So I'm still confused. Where exactly is the deception? Intel is still marketing this as "Raptor Lake" Next, and just like the 5800X3D "Anniversary Edition", it's being brought back to make use of existing DDR4/motherboards, since newer arch require DDR5.
ThomasKRefreshing an old product and giving it a new name seems deceiving, especially to the uninformed customer. If AMD dared to call the reheated 5800X3D anything other than its original name,
It's called the "Anniversary Edition" despite having zero spec changes besides a bundled graphene pad, and was presumably released for the same reasons as RPL-Next, which does actually have spec differences to previous RPL SKUs according to this article.
ThomasK you’d be the first one to show up in the comments to criticize.
Let's skip the projection.
Posted on Reply
#15
lexluthermiester
ThomasKRefreshing an old product and giving it a new name seems deceiving
How is that? Please explain to all us dimwits so we too can follow along..
_roman_I personally see it as FRAUD and not a 16 CORE CPU. These are low value 8 Core CPUs with a trash co processor with useless features.
Is this a troll? You can't be serious with that silly nonsense.
_roman_Most of my Software still can not handle many cores
That is not Intel's problem.
_roman_no Software can handle those mixed cores.
That is incorrect and possibly blatant ignorance.
_roman_Why should I buy a CPU which cpu instruction set I have to set to year 2005 to get it in a working state?
Ok, so you ARE in fact trolling TPU..
dgianstefaniLet's skip the projection.
Let's be fair, you do that from time to time.
Posted on Reply
#16
chrcoluk
Shame they going more E-core route instead of offering the 0 e-core 12 p-core SKU.
Posted on Reply
#17
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
lexluthermiesterLet's be fair, you do that from time to time.
Lol, fair enough. Though if I show up to criticize, I do try to ensure there's something worth criticizing before bothering.
Posted on Reply
#18
lexluthermiester
dgianstefaniLol, fair enough. Though if I show up to criticize, I do try to ensure there's something worth criticising before bothering.
And that's fair. I wasn't saying you were wrong. ;)
Posted on Reply
#19
ThomasK
dgianstefaniSo, same as 14th gen Raptor Lake Refresh that bumped i7 from 8 to 12 E cores and increased frequencies from 13th gen.

250K/270K plus incorporated 200S boost (higher internal frequencies), bumped cores from 6+8 and 8+8 to 6+12 and 8+16 of 245K/285K, and introduced APO, software binary optimization to leverage new architecture changes that older games weren't compiled/optimized for, on a per-game basis.

Raptor Lake Refresh (14th gen) gave one SKU (14700K) more cores, and bumped frequencies across the board. Non K SKUs remained based on 12th gen Alder Lake arch.

This "Raptor Lake Next" seems to do another core bump for the tiers, and likely has frequency changes. So it "fits within the naming scheme, only with a next added to it".

All three of these examples are similar, more cores, more frequency, some software optimization. So I'm still confused. Where exactly is the deception? Intel is still marketing this as "Raptor Lake" Next, and just like the 5800X3D "Anniversary Edition", it's being brought back to make use of existing DDR4/motherboards, since newer arch require DDR5.

It's called the "Anniversary Edition" despite having zero spec changes besides a bundled graphene pad, and was presumably released for the same reasons as RPL-Next, which does actually have spec differences to previous RPL SKUs according to this article.
All that time spent on explaining differences that I couldn't care less about, while conveniently avoiding the main problem: what will be the retail/customer facing name of the product, that's gonna be printed on the box? Not Raptor Lake Next, that's for sure. It'll be something akin to its mobile nomenclature, i.e. Core 7/9 not Ultra 2000, or whatever. That's what's gonna make the naïve folks think it might even be better than Arrow Lake/Plus, since it'll be launched after that and closely followed by Nova Lake.

It's just an old product, that's gonna be brought back, given a new name, a few changes, and made to look new. Intel should be honest with its future customers and call it Core i7/i9 14700/14900K Plus then. Would've made more sense.
dgianstefaniLet's skip the projection.
Not necessary, everyone here knows this to be a fact.
Posted on Reply
#20
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
ThomasKAll that time spent on explaining differences that I couldn't care less about, while conveniently avoiding the main problem: what will be the retail/customer facing name of the product, that's gonna be printed on the box? Not Raptor Lake Next, that's for sure. It'll be something akin to its mobile nomenclature, i.e. Core 7/9 not Ultra 2000, or whatever. That's what's gonna make the naïve folks think it might even be better than Arrow Lake/Plus, since it'll be launched after that and closely followed by Nova Lake.
What will be printed on the box? Do you have info that we don't? If you're not interested in technical detail and consistency, why post on a technical forum?
ThomasKIt's just an old product, that's gonna be brought back, given a new name, a few changes, and made to look new. Intel should be honest with its future customers and call it Core i7/i9 14700/14900K Plus then. Would've made more sense.
It's funny how you mention this here. Did you forget to do so elsewhere on every other rebrand? Higher tier/bin products have been rebranded at a later date as products of a newer marketing generation for many decades, from every chip manufacturer. E.g. 300 series "Strix" Halo and 400 series "Gorgon" Halo literally just being a 100 MHz frequency bump. Didn't see you on that news post complaining, though.
ThomasKNot necessary, everyone here knows this to be a fact.
Are "everyone here" and these "facts" something more than your opinion?
Posted on Reply
#21
lexluthermiester
ThomasKAll that time spent on explaining differences that I couldn't care less about
Your problem, not everyone else's.
ThomasKNot Raptor Lake Next, that's for sure.
Sure it is. You are not Intel. You are not manufacturing the CPU's and you do not get to name them.
ThomasKIt's just an old product, that's gonna be brought back, given a new name, a few changes, and made to look new.
If you have a problem with that, YOU have the problem. Intel is bring a product line to market as an answer to the severe market situation we're all experiencing. Anyone who understands what they're doing understands they're trying to solve a set of problems, not create new ones. People complaining, like you're doing here, seem blissfully unaware of the bigger picture..
ThomasKNot necessary, everyone here knows this to be a fact.
That doesn't mean you are not projecting or that your above statement isn't incorrect. So there is that.
Posted on Reply
#22
ThomasK
dgianstefaniWhat will be printed on the box? Do you have info that we don't?
I might have. I work for a major OEM. I won't share it here, though.

Sit and wait for the official release :)
dgianstefaniIf you're not interested in technical detail and consistency
Those are your words, not mine.
dgianstefaniwhy post on a technical forum?
You mean the same forum that often posts rumors about unreleased products from dubious reddit sources?

Let's skip the "technical detail and consistency" narrative, please.
Posted on Reply
#23
lexluthermiester
ThomasKYou mean the same forum that often posts rumors about unreleased products from dubious reddit sources?
Seriously? While I agree that TPU should avoid reddit crap, let's be factual, all tech sites report on rumors during slow tech news periods and they always have. It has the potential to be fun and interesting.
Posted on Reply
#24
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
ThomasKAll that time spent on explaining differences that I couldn't care less about
dgianstefaniIf you're not interested in technical detail and consistency, why post on a technical forum?
ThomasKThose are your words, not mine.
Please, clarify the differences in meaning.
ThomasKI might have. I work for a major OEM. I won't share it here, though.
So why mention it here then?
Posted on Reply
#25
lexluthermiester
dgianstefaniSo why mention it here then?
Because they're flexing.. Why else?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 12th, 2026 04:40 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts