FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
- Messages
- 26,147 (5.83/day)
- Location
- IA, USA
System Name | BY-2015 |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on |
Motherboard | MSI Z170A GAMING M7 |
Cooling | Scythe Kotetsu |
Memory | 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire Radeon RX 5500 XT Pulse 8 GiB |
Storage | Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate Exos X12 TB 7200 RPM |
Display(s) | Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI) |
Case | Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay |
Audio Device(s) | Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+ |
Power Supply | Enermax Platimax 850w |
Mouse | SteelSeries Sensei RAW |
Keyboard | Tesoro Excalibur |
Software | Windows 10 Pro 64-bit |
Benchmark Scores | Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare. |
Eh, I don't buy the argument that running a card at 100% load for extended periods of time really impacts life span. It just exposes design flaws faster. A card with crappy hardware might last just over a year under normal gaming load but when stressed, they could crap out in a month. A card with good hardware shouldn't care if it was stressed for a year or five years.
Where's the evidence that this card that survived a month was ever used for mining?
Where's the evidence that this card that survived a month was ever used for mining?