• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Share your AIDA 64 cache and memory benchmark here

It takes a good fx series chip to run 2400mhz you csn try bumping your nb volts.

Exactly. But I don't like the IMCs on the AMD CPUs. I hoped for performance increase in IMC after the Phenom II but its not what I expected it to be. Even a Intel Core i3's IMC is better than the FX CPUs.
 
amd have always gone for lower latency from their ram, its some thing they took from nvidia chipsets back in the day.

update for my mobo/cpu too :)

i have been able to push the ram a bit higher with haswell :D
 

Attachments

  • aida.jpg
    aida.jpg
    46.4 KB · Views: 1,128
A tad better results on same OC after some bios tweaking

cachemem3.png
 
could you delete my worse one on the table pretty please :D
 
could you delete my worse one on the table pretty please :D

Yes I can but having the lesser score also will be helpful for people overclocking their CPU- The reason I made this thread. :)
 
Please explain to me how this is possible... why is it reading my cache many times faster than it was before, faster memory (but slower latency, heh)? And what's with the L4 cache... does such a thing exist?

http://img.techpowerup.org/130831/Clipboard01.jpg

Yeah it is because both the cache and memory are tested with larger memory blocks than before. This is made in the new version so that the readings are more accurate because CPU cycle stealing always occurs.

As for L4 cache, it might be released soon. ;)
And score is added now. :)
 
on my Hynix sticks 2*8GB

cachemem.png
 
Last edited:
L4 cache as I read it for Intel at least is future Haswell-R chips will have the HD5200 series for graphics chips, and 128MB or better L4 cache at 512-bit for initial accessible memory before utilizing system memory. I'm curious to see what really happens...but your question made me do a quick search and that's what I found here:

http://wccftech.com/intel-hd-graphi...ance-compared-hd-5200-gt3e-par-gt640-hd-6670/

The HD 5200 would feature will dedicated a large amount of the die to an onboard eDRAM package. The L4 cache memory codenamed ‘Crystalwell’ would significantly boost the iGPU performance on Haswell equipped Notebooks by delivering increased bandwidth to the iGPU. Anandtech revealed that the HD 5200 GT3e would make use of 128 MB of eDRAM connected to the main SOC (Haswell Processor) via a 512-bit bus.
Performance of Haswell CPUs with the 4th Generation Intel HD 5200 graphic chips would be better than NVIDIA GT 640 and much better than AMD’s Radeon HD 6670 discrete graphics solutions...


Read more: http://wccftech.com/intel-hd-graphi...hd-5200-gt3e-par-gt640-hd-6670/#ixzz2dcIZfdGf

Nice results DOM! All speeds are about 8,000 to 10,000 MB/s faster on RAM than mine at 2133 11-11-11-28 cr1, and your latency is approx 10ns lower too. I know many say Haswell likes timings over speed...but it seems the most noticeable "test" results show speed over timings. Though I haven't tested with my new 4770k yet...but with my last one on my current build, using a divider to clock the RAM up to 2200 showed a significant reduction in speed...iirc it was around the same as what my memory tests at 1600 speed. 2133 at which is rated is good for 30,000 avg and 50ns.
 
Last edited:
Capture310.jpg


Memory is overclocked. CPU isn't overclocked but it is undervolted.

4.2Ghz CPU OC
Capture312.jpg
 
Last edited:



amd have always gone for lower latency from their ram, its some thing they took from nvidia chipsets back in the day.

update for my mobo/cpu too :)

i have been able to push the ram a bit higher with haswell :D

How did you two manage to break 35k read? Did any of you tweak adv ram timings?



Well my read & copy fails at 2400 or 2666mhz.. But I noticed it raised those particular timings (tRTL, tIOL) a lot and maybe that's just it. Apparently optimal tRTL 40-41 and tIOL 4

2133MHz
2133dcs8v.png



2400MHz CL10
cachemem2400mhzq1skb.png



2666MHz CL11
cachemem2667mhzldsdk.png

 
How did you two manage to break 35k read? Did any of you tweak adv ram timings?



Well my read & copy fails at 2400 or 2666mhz.. But I noticed it raised those particular timings (tRTL, tIOL) a lot and maybe that's just it. Apparently optimal tRTL 40-41 and tIOL 4

2133MHz
http://abload.de/img/2133dcs8v.png
[url]http://abload.de/thumb/2133mhzcl9xts1k.png[/url]

2400MHz CL10
http://abload.de/img/cachemem2400mhzq1skb.png
[url]http://abload.de/thumb/2400mhzramoccl1089s1y.png[/url]

2666MHz CL11
http://abload.de/img/cachemem2667mhzldsdk.png
[url]http://abload.de/thumb/2667mhzramoccl116ksjn.png[/url]

No Beta version please. Use the latest stable version as stated in the rules. Thanks.
 
There isnt really a difference, maybe 100mb/s max in best scenario.

I will post again :)
 

I cannot see the images. They appear as corrupt. Can you please verify the upload and the forum code?
are they working? I can see them...

How did you two manage to break 35k read? Did any of you tweak adv ram timings?

nothing just set it under the mem set it to performance but even at stock 2400Mhz I get 35K not set to performance

but then the OCF has settings for different types of mem chips
 


Corsair Dominator Platinum 4 x 4GB. DDR3-2400 @ DDR3-2000 (9-12-12-32 CR2 @ 1.6V)
 
are they working? I can see them...



nothing just set it under the mem set it to performance but even at stock 2400Mhz I get 35K not set to performance

but then the OCF has settings for different types of mem chips

No man they are not coming. Really weird. :confused:
 
well i messed around with my timings a little bit and finally got my memory to run at 2400. here are the results.

quickmem.png
 
UPDATE: An updated version is available. You can download it from the official website. Just make sure to uninstall the present version and then install the new version. First post is updated.
 
are they working? I can see them...



nothing just set it under the mem set it to performance but even at stock 2400Mhz I get 35K not set to performance

but then the OCF has settings for different types of mem chips

i think its the imc we have and the higher speeds with pretty good latency we both ran which helped our scores tbh dude.

i have most of the bios settings set for speed not performance atm as i am still learning how to oc on this new platform.

and no, i cant see them either.
 
Back
Top