• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Share your AIDA 64 cache and memory benchmark here

Current OC with AIDA64 benchmark on GSkill kit (Samsung B-Die ic).
i7-6700K 4.7GHz DDR4-3866C16.PNG
 
I had some variations with different motherboards vs other peoples' scores with this benchmark. BIOS did also make a difference. Unless you are noticing actual performance issues in real-world applications that you use, or a synthetic like Cinebench, I honestly wouldn't worry too much.
The problem is that we have identical setups, but he has worse memory (both timings and frequency). And my results are the lowest that I've seen.

I did not try cinebench yet and it's not that I care to much, gaming vice it is performing as expected
 
The problem is that we have identical setups, but he has worse memory (both timings and frequency). And my results are the lowest that I've seen.

I did not try cinebench yet and it's not that I care to much, gaming vice it is performing as expected
It could even be a software thing? Something running in the background interfering with the result? I dunno. It could also be that your settings aren't 100% stable.
 
Based on this thread... Gauging interested in an AIDA64 competition... I was thinking like primarily the cache and memory benchmark but we could also include a couple CPU benchmarks as well. Would folks be interested in something like this?
- Leaderboards and individual champions for read, write and memory latency
-Champions in CPU division as well for specific benchmark (yet to be determined)
-Leaderboards would be updated on a near daily basis for accurate scoring
 
It won't work.
AIDA64 can tweak benchmark part for every update, so list would have to be version locked.
 
It won't work.
AIDA64 can tweak benchmark part for every update, so list would have to be version locked.
We've done it before on other overclocking forums. Version to version is slightly different but the cache and memory benchmark doesn't change much, so regardless of the version we should get relatively accurate results with just that portion of the benchmark.
 
I think I post before my max memory result reached with i7-5820K and Dominator Platinum 2666 C15, with overclocked Cache, not much Core and speed timmings before few months.
I will try for few days to OC memory or drop latency to see is it possible to reach 65.000...
That's not so bad result at all for 6core 15MB L3 Cache on kit and configuration from 2014, without dual sided, kits. But it's Samsung memory.
That was mine speed from day 1 with X99 and one of first kits. When I bought memory CORSAIR didn't even plan to launch Special Edition 3200kits I like.
 

Attachments

  • 16GX4M4A2666C15 Memory Benchmark.PNG
    16GX4M4A2666C15 Memory Benchmark.PNG
    130.4 KB · Views: 1,067
View attachment 110220

Passed at 17-17-17 but forgot to take a screenshot. Sub-timings are quite relaxed.
Nice work as always from you. Just curious, what kind stability test did it pass and is it any good for 24/7? If so, care to share voltages? Thanks.
 
No idea about stability on this motherboard. The same memory can make 4500 stable on other motherboards that can't boot at much more than 4600. At 4800 it can pass most benchmarks without bigger issues. I got the motherboard yesterday so I was only checking max clock and quick tests.

ASRock Z390 PG-ITX/ac - stable at 4500 XMP or 19-19-19 1.45V, 1.35V SA, 1.30V IO
MSI Z370I GC ITX - stable at 4500 20-20-20 1.45V, 1.35V SA, 1.30V IO
ASUS MXIG - no stability tests, for benchmarks 4500 16-15-15 1.5V / 4666 16-16-16 1.55V, 1.35V SA, 1.30V IO, 4800 17-17-17 or 18-18-18 1.6V, 1.4V SA, 1.30V IO

IMC requires much higher voltages above that so I won't even try to run long stability tests. Let's say that motherboards tell you that 1.6V SA can instantly kill the CPU ... and I set some more
 
Still torture this OEM RAM.
1.78V in BIOS 1.848V actual.

3500 12-17.jpg


135918.jpg


Some result for Micron D9VPP 2666 @ 3900. Only test with one stick since the other was DOA.

3900 sub aida.jpg


3900 sub memtest.jpg
 
View attachment 110220

Passed at 17-17-17 but forgot to take a screenshot. Sub-timings are quite relaxed.

That's pretty crazy high bandwidth for "only" dual channel memory. I'm sure the 5 ghz of 8086k has a lot to do with it but I see reviews for memory for all the dual channel platforms and they never get near 60-70k mbs. However I've never seen them near 4800 mhz that's a crazy high number especially with such low latency wow. That's very impressive indeed.
 
ryzen with (g)skill ;)

Hi, What's your timings like? can you post a ryzen timing checker screen pls?

my daily settings with flare x
dailyvnizp.png
 
Guys any idea why my L1/L2 cache speeds are so low? :/
I have gotten pretty different results from this benchmark from similar CPUs i'm not really sure what's going on but the cache bandwidth seems to be wildly off. I only really trust the latency results.

Here is my 1400 with Oc on core and RAM.
1400-cachemem.png
 
Untitled.jpg

Gee.. Registered on TPU just to post this..
I'm 45ns on a gd-dmn H110. I'm getting obsessed with this memory latency thing lately.
Hope Ryzen 3000 will be better in this regard.
 
Here's a couple that I did a little while ago for another thread.


snaphsot0004.png
snaphsot0001.png
 
Scored 3 8gb ddr3 sodimms (samsung) @ 1600mhz, (runs at 1333mhz max on my clevo) and here's how it done at stock:
1549466179099.png
 
Cheap ADATA DDR4 (samung oem) 2400mhz CL16 model .
not dissapointed lol

AScmNYF[1].png
 
Back
Top