Friday, August 7th 2009

Intel Responds to Phenom II X2 BE with Pentium E6500K

With the 45 nm Phenom II AM3 architecture, AMD is able to offer two highly competitive mainstream dual-core processors: the Phenom II X2 (Callisto), and Athlon II X2 (Regor). The Phenom II X2 550 Black Edition chips not only serves as a notable sub-$100 choice for mainstream consumers, but also offers good value to overclockers with an unlocked bus multiplier, and with the right tools, the potential to unlock disabled physical cores. With its prime competitor from the blue camp being Pentium Dual-Core E5000 and E6000 series, Intel decided to up the stakes with a low-cost overclocker-friendly dual-core processor labeled Pentium Dual-Core E6500K, the company's first FSB multiplier-unlocked 45 nm dual-core chip.

Based on the 45 nm Wolfdale-2M core, the E6500K boasts of a default clock speed of 2.93 GHz (11.0 x 266 MHz). The bus multiplier is unlocked, leaving room to play with it. Placed in the Pentium E6000 series, the chip has a FSB frequency of 1066 MHz, compared to its E5000 cousins that sport 800 MHz FSB. Aided with a 2 MB L2 cache, the E6500K is expected to go head-on against competing AMD chips. Currently available in China for RMB 1299 (converts to $190) as part of bundle with Biostar T-Series TP45E motherboard, the E6500K is expected to retail soon for US $89. Incidentally, the "K" in E6500K refers to "black" in digital imaging jargon.
Source: Expreview
Add your own comment

98 Comments on Intel Responds to Phenom II X2 BE with Pentium E6500K

#26
[I.R.A]_FBi
wonder how fast it could encode my n0rp

“try intel cpu, amd is only good for going to nude sites”
Posted on Reply
#27
Darren
Fitseries3my "opinion" is based upon actual hands on experience from using and OCing almost everything that is out there.
I agree with you, Intel do offer great overclocking potential and possibly better than everything else out today, I 100% agree now that I've got an explanation, if you said this to begin with I would of thanked you. But if you say "I do not like x company" without explanation then you are opening yourself up for flame.
Posted on Reply
#28
Fitseries3
Eleet Hardware Junkie
i changed my post too... LOOOOOOOOOONG before anyone flamed
Posted on Reply
#29
nafets
I would buy this CPU just to mess around with a cheap unlocked Intel processor. Hopefully these make their way to the US. Intel would have a huge hit on their hands over here...
Posted on Reply
#30
Fitseries3
Eleet Hardware Junkie
find me one... i'll be the first to test
Posted on Reply
#31
BrooksyX
Dang, this looks like an awesome chip!!! Makes me kinda mad that I went with my e6300 wolfdale. It overclocks pretty well also though and I only paid $55 for it.

Interested to see your results fit!
Posted on Reply
#32
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
DarrenBut if you say "I do not like x company" without explanation then you are opening yourself up for flame.
To which, instead of being responsible and ignoring, you flame back. :rolleyes:
Darrenbtarunr, so saying that you dislike AMD or any other company without a "valid expanation", correct without an explanation period isn't flaming too?
I objected to the part of the post I quoted, where you called out someone else. No more discussion on this issue, (no editing older posts to respond to this either).
Posted on Reply
#33
AltecV1
what enoyes me the most is that they went back on the E6XXX:shadedshu WHY INTEL WHY,it is just sooo confuseing:mad:
Posted on Reply
#34
DanishDevil
I may very well be picking one of these up to play with.
Posted on Reply
#35
BrooksyX
AltecV1what enoyes me the most is that they went back on the E6XXX:shadedshu WHY INTEL WHY,it is just sooo confuseing:mad:
lol I agree they could have at least changed the letter prefix or gonna with a higher e5xxx number. Like e5700 for the e6300 and e5900k for this new e6500k chip.
Posted on Reply
#36
Fitseries3
Eleet Hardware Junkie
shoulda been

X5900K
Posted on Reply
#38
kid41212003
Wow, this is HUGE! The first unlocked dual-core CPU from Intel! And It's not ~$1k!
Posted on Reply
#39
mdm-adph
Yes, it's a better chip than AMD's at that price range (except for the unlocking abilities with AMD's dual-core).

What's more important to me is that Intel just made another move to respond to AMD, not the other way around. :D
Posted on Reply
#40
Darren
Indeed its nice to see Intel react aggressively,

I hope this forces AMD to pursue the competitive route further in pricing, I'm looking forwards to AMD's Athlon II X4 series, they are rumoured to be priced sub $100 if this is true I feel that AMD will continue to hold their ground at low end and midrange segment.


Edit:
MilleniaAMD's current offerings are already pretty damn competitively priced, don't know if they can go too much cheaper :p
I agree, they'll have to settle for less profit, in the UK the Phenom II X3 720 BE is already priced at £89.42 on Ebuyer.com, AMD might strategically price the Athlon II X4 below the Phenom II X3s because the Phenom II is of a higher tier by name and branding (we'll have to wait for reviews to see if the benchmarks reflect the name)
Posted on Reply
#41
Millenia
DarrenIndeed its nice to see Intel react agressively,

I hope this forces AMD to persue the competitive route, I'm looking forwards to AMD's Athlon II X4 series, they are rumoured to be priced sub $100 if this is true I feel that AMD will continue to hold their ground at low end and midrange sigment.
AMD's current offerings are already pretty damn competitively priced, don't know if they can go too much cheaper :p
Posted on Reply
#42
Melvis
If this chip comes to AUS and sells for around $130 then yes this chip will be competitive because the Phenom 550 sells for $120 here and beats the E8400 (from what ive seen in Benchmarks anyway) and costs literally double the price at $250 and the Athlon II 250 nips at the heels of the E8400 and costs $105 here.

So if this CPU comes in at that price point then yes intel FINALLY has a competitive CPU against AMD's offering at a low cost.
Posted on Reply
#43
ShadowFold
Only 2m L2, might not be quite as fast. Unless they all do 4ghz+ with low voltage, I can't see them doing that well.
Posted on Reply
#44
Zubasa
newtekie1I wouldn't gamble on unlocking. Despite what it seems like, it is rare to be sucessful. And even more rare to be sucessful and stable, especially on a chip with two of the cores disable. The chances of having a defective core are enormous.
True that no one can garrantee a sucessful unlock, but neither can anyone garrantee that the E6500K will all OC great either. On the other hand, you can get a decent am2/am3 mobo at the price of a cheap P45/43, so unless you already owns a 775 platform and buying this chip for fun, I wouldn't say this is the better choice.
Posted on Reply
#45
erocker
*
Saw a forum post on OC.net that claims 4.2ghz on air without raising the voltage. ES sample of course.
Posted on Reply
#46
Zubasa
Well, all retail processors are only garenteed to run at its stock setting.
ES almost always OC higher than anything you can grab off the shelf.
Posted on Reply
#47
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
It seems the box doesn't include a stock-cooler.
Posted on Reply
#48
Zubasa
Who OC with their stock cooler anyways? :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#49
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
ZubasaWho OC with their stock cooler anyways? :laugh:
True. If we look back in time, the Athlon64 X2 5000+ BE didn't pack one either.
Posted on Reply
#50
$ReaPeR$
i cannot find a point in buying this proc ( even though it seems pretty good ) if you already have a C2D, i would like a 1366 soc proc at 150€ i would consider that a true feat from intel and i would definitely buy that, but i think that ill never see that :(
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 09:29 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts