Friday, December 23rd 2011

Windows 8 build 8172 Screenshots Emerge

Sometime in 2012, Microsoft is expected to announce its next major version of Windows for the client platform. It has the working name "Windows 8", and was previewed to developers at the BUILD Conference, this September. A member of Chinese tech site PCbeta community got to play with a newer build of Windows, build 8172. Screenshots of its most common user interface elements, such as desktop, Windows Explorer, PC Settings (control panel), etc., were posted. Engadget notes that these screenshots don't reveal much else from the Windows Developer Preview shown at the BUILD Conference.
The first screenshot above reveals the Start screen featuring Metro UI design elements (which replaces the Start Menu), the second reveals PC Settings screen, which serves the purpose of the Windows Control Panel, and the next two screenshots reveal the Windows Explorer user interface with its "ribbon" element collapse and expanded.
The next screenshot (above), reveals the new file transfer dialog, which provides a little more information than just a progress bar, an animation, and a few numbers. The progress bar embeds a graph that reports transfer speeds in real time. Next up, is the new Task Manager, which gives greater control over running tasks and processes; and the final screen reveals the new sidebar, which makes the taskbar optional. In all, Microsoft plans some major UI changes, while retaining compatibility with many of the elements found in Windows 7, to ease the transition. The window titlebars themselves look identical in function to the ones Windows 7 gives you, but that there are some aesthetic changes. Basically every rounded-edge is sharpened out. The PCbeta member who leaked these screenshots confirmed that build 8172 is still pre-beta.
Sources: PCbeta, Engadget
Add your own comment

75 Comments on Windows 8 build 8172 Screenshots Emerge

#51
phanbuey
what a shitty design... This is a step back from 7. Typical windows fail.

They should copy more from apple and linux UI, they would fail less.
Posted on Reply
#52
repman244
phanbueyThey should copy more from apple and linux UI, they would fail less.
Oh hell no. And they would get sued by Apple the second they release it :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#53
Prima.Vera
You cannot judge an OS only after a couple of screenshots. Let's wait for some reviews before jumping to conclusions. If you can disable that Metro crap, and if is faster and loads also faster than Win 7, than it will be a success. If is the same or worst it will be another Windows ME.:ohwell:
Posted on Reply
#55
GoFigureItOut
This is to be expected, really. It seems as if Microsoft releases a killer OS then its followed up by a shitty one. Microsoft should allow people to choose the look and feel of Windows 8. Not everyone likes an OS that's geared towards tablets.

"If it's not broke, DONT FIX IT"
Posted on Reply
#56
Fx
that is the most screenshots of W8 I have seen yet and and so far I am not a fan. I also agree that the task manager looked good but that was it. everything else looked dumbed down

I love W7 and the only reason I might switch to W8 is if I can customize the look and feel to resemble W7 while having the added benefits of the supposed robust platform improvements
Posted on Reply
#58
CrAsHnBuRnXp
GoFigureItOutThis is to be expected, really. It seems as if Microsoft releases a killer OS then its followed up by a shitty one. Microsoft should allow people to choose the look and feel of Windows 8. Not everyone likes an OS that's geared towards tablets.

"If it's not broke, DONT FIX IT"
I just wish there was an OS as open source as Linux with the simplicity and look/feel of windows that can actually run PC games without using WINE.
Posted on Reply
#59
arnoo1
me wants !!!!!!!!!
but not that metro thingie:P
Posted on Reply
#60
AphexDreamer
Why does it seem they are trying so hard to make the PC something it isn't?
Posted on Reply
#61
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
GoFigureItOut"If it's not broke, DONT FIX IT"
This implies that anything can be perfect, and that is impossible. Windows XP was fine but now I don't like it, Win98 SE was good but not anymore. Etc.
Posted on Reply
#62
Lazzer408
If it's not broke, DONT FIX IT -GoFigureItOut

If it's not broke, break it, then sell the broken pieces as new features -Microsoft
Posted on Reply
#63
AphexDreamer
Lazzer408If it's not broke, DONT FIX IT -GoFigureItOut

If it's not broke, break it, then sell the broken pieces as new features -Microsoft
Then repair those features in Windows 9 to again sell them as something new.

Genius.
Posted on Reply
#64
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
That process is called innovation. Sometimes you hit, sometimes you miss. If you miss Windows 98SE that much (because it wasn't that broken, neither was XP or 2K) just go back to it.
Posted on Reply
#65
CrAsHnBuRnXp
Windows 2000 doesnt support quad cores. (unless its the server edition)
Posted on Reply
#66
OOZMAN
AthlonX2you spelled colored wrong :p
You ignorant yank. ;) :toast:

Looks like 8 is the new vista...
Posted on Reply
#67
Lazzer408
FrickThat process is called innovation. Sometimes you hit, sometimes you miss. If you miss Windows 98SE that much (because it wasn't that broken, neither was XP or 2K) just go back to it.
No that's called darts. I've played it at bars before. :toast: MS "innovation" (theft) created Windows. MS marketing has their hands in the soup now. Better better more more. How shiny do they think they can polish this terd before they burn through the clear coat? There are very few products out there that actually focus on quality first. Quality is always second to profit. That's the only reason they have to release another version at this point.
Posted on Reply
#68
Moose
Why do people only like the task manager? I like the task manager and the copy file display!
AthlonX2you spelled colored wrong :p
No you spelt coloured wrong *facepalm*
Posted on Reply
#69
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
Lazzer408MS "innovation" (theft) created Windows.
I'm not sure I understand your point here.
Better better more more. How shiny do they think they can polish this terd before they burn through the clear coat? There are very few products out there that actually focus on quality first. Quality is always second to profit. That's the only reason they have to release another version at this point.
It's how the world works. This is true for pretty much everything at this point.
Posted on Reply
#70
t77snapshot
I will most likely stick with Win7 for as long as I stuck with xp. ;)


..besides, I finally got comfortably dialed into 7 and simply wont switch so quickly.
Posted on Reply
#71
micropage7
t77snapshotI will most likely stick with Win7 for as long as I stuck with xp. ;)


..besides, I finally got comfortably dialed into 7 and simply wont switch so quickly.
agree, except win 8 offers more than win7 could handle ;)
Posted on Reply
#72
AphexDreamer
Well it might look like a fail but how does it feel?
Posted on Reply
#73
dicobalt
I like it, especially the changes under the hood to increase speed and reduce bloat. The only thing I don't like is Metro. I will be using a faux start button in my start bar or maybe I will use Rainmeter instead.
Posted on Reply
#74
Xajel
newtekie1Windows 8 is terrible, every change they have made is bad! They should have left everything the same as Window 7.
There's something called Windows 7, this is what you want.. and when you hear any thing more than 7; like Windows 8... then just ignore and don't upgrade. this will fully satisfy your needs :rolleyes:


for the rest of us... well.. continue reading :cool:
Posted on Reply
#75
devguy
Urghhh, enough of this showing off UI changes crap. Show me the new FS (WinFS, ReFS, Protogon, or w/e), and give me data showing it crushing the far too old NTFS or GTFO.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 19:58 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts