Monday, October 5th 2026

Windows 11 26H2 Update Lowers RAM Consumption

When Microsoft released its Windows 11 26H2 update last week, it didn't include many under-the-hood changes that would affect everyday users. However, according to Windows Latest and several Reddit users, the update reportedly reduces RAM consumption when the system is idle, and even when does better management of RAM when applications are loaded. This improvement wasn't advertised by Microsoft, but it seems to be a welcome change for those who prefer lower RAM usage when not running any tasks. On Reddit, users are reporting a reduction in memory consumption of around 2 GB, with some experiencing up to a 3 GB decrease in idle RAM usage. Testing by Windows Latest on a laptop with 16 GB of RAM shows that, whereas it usually idled at 10 GB of usage, it now consumes 7 GB, with 4 GB of that cached and 8.8 GB available.

The update also introduces features like the Low Latency Profile, which is expanding to nearly all applications and could potentially make software launch faster on weaker hardware. Previously available for Microsoft-branded "in-box" applications, this feature boosts the CPU to its maximum frequency for 1-3 seconds, resulting in noticeably smoother app launches during testing. Launching Microsoft applications like Edge and Outlook is about 40% faster, and other applications, such as the Start Menu and context menus across the operating system, may be up to 70% faster. Now, other applications are receiving this update, which means the overall experience will be much smoother.
Finally, it is worth pointing out that when Windows loads something in the background, it doesn't necessarily mean that the RAM consumption is wasted. Windows caches services and applications in RAM to ensure that once a user needs a service, the application is already loaded in the background, providing an instantaneous response. This, however, doesn't mean that Windows is perfect and unnecessary telemetry isn't present, but Microsoft has surely made optimizations to find a balance between needed background applications to operate smoothly and just enough space to free up some capacity.
Sources: Windows Latest, Reddit
Add your own comment

76 Comments on Windows 11 26H2 Update Lowers RAM Consumption

#1
Onasi
The fuck are those idle numbers? My system is at, like, 2.5 gigs at idle with 32 gigs of RAM. What are those systems even doing to idle at 10? Before someone brings up browser tabs - I don’t consider that being “idle”. To me, and AFAIK to any sensible person, “idle Windows” is what the OS uses showing the desktop after a clean boot and a couple of minutes to finish up all startup scheduled tasks to reach steady memory state. As far as that definition goes, I have never seen a competently ran Windows install that would consume 10 gigabytes of fucking RAM.
Posted on Reply
#3
Wirko
OnasiWhat are those systems even doing to idle at 10?
Please don't get so upset, it will be 7 GB from now on.
Posted on Reply
#4
Mysteoa
OnasiThe fuck are those idle numbers? My system is at, like, 2.5 gigs at idle with 32 gigs of RAM. What are those systems even doing to idle at 10? Before someone brings up browser tabs - I don’t consider that being “idle”. To me, and AFAIK to any sensible person, “idle Windows” is what the OS uses showing the desktop after a clean boot and a couple of minutes to finish up all startup scheduled tasks to reach steady memory state. As far as that definition goes, I have never seen a competently ran Windows install that would consume 10 gigabytes of fucking RAM.
Is your windows stock or did you heavily configure it?

Closing all background soft, puts mine on 7.5GB.
Posted on Reply
#5
Blazko79
Will check this, before was 50% free of 8GB and no app opened on my HP 255 G8.
Posted on Reply
#6
Onasi
MysteoaIs your windows stock or did you heavily configure it?
Of course it isn’t stock. That’s part of the whole “competently ran” part. That said, I have used and installed plenty of bone stock, default 11s. They aren’t hitting 10 gigs of usage. The only thing I can think of is that the system in question is a laptop and those often come with biblical levels of pointless OEM bloatware, but I fail to see how that would be MS problem to fix.
Posted on Reply
#7
Konceptz
OnasiThe fuck are those idle numbers? My system is at, like, 2.5 gigs at idle with 32 gigs of RAM. What are those systems even doing to idle at 10? Before someone brings up browser tabs - I don’t consider that being “idle”. To me, and AFAIK to any sensible person, “idle Windows” is what the OS uses showing the desktop after a clean boot and a couple of minutes to finish up all startup scheduled tasks to reach steady memory state. As far as that definition goes, I have never seen a competently ran Windows install that would consume 10 gigabytes of fucking RAM.
I'm at 5.0gb.
Posted on Reply
#8
zaku49
OnasiThe fuck are those idle numbers? My system is at, like, 2.5 gigs at idle with 32 gigs of RAM. What are those systems even doing to idle at 10? Before someone brings up browser tabs - I don’t consider that being “idle”. To me, and AFAIK to any sensible person, “idle Windows” is what the OS uses showing the desktop after a clean boot and a couple of minutes to finish up all startup scheduled tasks to reach steady memory state. As far as that definition goes, I have never seen a competently ran Windows install that would consume 10 gigabytes of fucking RAM.
Windows will try to cache everything into ram, it will also cache things it predicts you might open. It's working as designed and will free up the ram as needed. More being used is actually a good thing based on how modern systems work. The more ram you have the more it will try to cache.
Posted on Reply
#10
Onasi
@zaku49
Thank you for this educational post on the matters I already am aware on. It will also
use memory more aggressively the more the system has of it, yea. Problem is - cached memory set is separate, it’s not what is displayed in the actively used number.
Like, it’s right there. On the screenshot from Task Manager in this very news article. It’s not the cache. It’s ostensibly an idling system using almost 10 gigabytes. In no world is this normal and is absolutely NOT a usual Win 11 behavior in my experience.
Posted on Reply
#11
jameslapc
Now if only it'd lower my work laptop idle consumption.
Posted on Reply
#12
JustBenching
OnasiThe fuck are those idle numbers? My system is at, like, 2.5 gigs at idle with 32 gigs of RAM. What are those systems even doing to idle at 10? Before someone brings up browser tabs - I don’t consider that being “idle”. To me, and AFAIK to any sensible person, “idle Windows” is what the OS uses showing the desktop after a clean boot and a couple of minutes to finish up all startup scheduled tasks to reach steady memory state. As far as that definition goes, I have never seen a competently ran Windows install that would consume 10 gigabytes of fucking RAM.
2.4 for me. Gotcha!!😋
Posted on Reply
#13
Philaphlous
Before reboot my system idles at 14.2GB with absolutely nothing up. After reboot its 6.7GB so still pretty awful. I suspect the MemoryCartel app is running in the background somewhere...
Posted on Reply
#14
windwhirl
OnasiThe fuck are those idle numbers? My system is at, like, 2.5 gigs at idle with 32 gigs of RAM. What are those systems even doing to idle at 10? Before someone brings up browser tabs - I don’t consider that being “idle”. To me, and AFAIK to any sensible person, “idle Windows” is what the OS uses showing the desktop after a clean boot and a couple of minutes to finish up all startup scheduled tasks to reach steady memory state. As far as that definition goes, I have never seen a competently ran Windows install that would consume 10 gigabytes of fucking RAM.
What they're describing sounds about right tho. Currently you need to consider that you have drivers running in the background that are not just drivers but also include user-facing elements which probably no longer use small memory footprint but instead use rather memory-heavy frameworks, Microsoft Edge is permanently running if you have Game Bar, then there's the Widgets stuff that are basically another Edge browser running, if you're using Onedrive that's another thing that's running in the background, and the stuff just piles on and on.
Posted on Reply
#15
_roman_
I pulled the enablement package from somewhere else as microsoft pages could not provide it

Windows online updates were done an hour ago.

download at your own risk windowsreport.com/windows-11-26h2-kb5121794-enablement-package-ekb-direct-download-for-offline-installer-msu/





Far too high DRAM consumption after reboot



Okay unfair you opened a www-client. Far too much DRAM consumption, no apps opened, except taskmgr.exe



My referecne values are 512MIB for a plain desktop, and 2GIB dram when vivaldi is open. those are unoptimised DRAM usage wihtout any extra filles written to disk.

In my point of view, i see much more DRAM consumption. i expect the kenrel to destroy bar sections and free them instantly.

DRAM which is blocked can not be used by anything else.
Posted on Reply
#16
Dubiopolis
jameslapcNow if only it'd lower my work laptop idle consumption.
"Idle"

My work laptop is the same
Posted on Reply
#17
SleepDart
OnasiThe fuck are those idle numbers? My system is at, like, 2.5 gigs at idle with 32 gigs of RAM. What are those systems even doing to idle at 10? Before someone brings up browser tabs - I don’t consider that being “idle”. To me, and AFAIK to any sensible person, “idle Windows” is what the OS uses showing the desktop after a clean boot and a couple of minutes to finish up all startup scheduled tasks to reach steady memory state. As far as that definition goes, I have never seen a competently ran Windows install that would consume 10 gigabytes of fucking RAM.
Now on Stock consumes a lot less, wich is a Win for not ruin your SSD for not having enough RAM.
Posted on Reply
#18
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
OnasiThe fuck are those idle numbers? My system is at, like, 2.5 gigs at idle with 32 gigs of RAM. What are those systems even doing to idle at 10? Before someone brings up browser tabs - I don’t consider that being “idle”. To me, and AFAIK to any sensible person, “idle Windows” is what the OS uses showing the desktop after a clean boot and a couple of minutes to finish up all startup scheduled tasks to reach steady memory state. As far as that definition goes, I have never seen a competently ran Windows install that would consume 10 gigabytes of fucking RAM.
Unused RAM is wasted RAM. People do obsess over using minimal amounts, and while there is some logic to that regarding CPU usage etc. It doesn't really matter if the application is cached in RAM when not used, then ends up used, or it isn't used, something else is, and it's removed from cache to make space for that other thing.

There's no significant inherent advantage in having x amount of empty RAM space, beyond fewer CPU handles, unless the RAM ISN'T freed up if it's needed for something not cached etc, but mostly the benefit in theory would be that you don't first have to unload something, to load something else. That happens on the order of nanoseconds though. Selective suspend means that the application in RAM is also using mimimal/no CPU resources most of the time, and springs into action if needed.

I do think people should chase reducing CPU handles/load, alongside network optimisation and reduction of bloat, than trying to keep as much free RAM as possible for no other reason than chasing smallest numbers possible.
windwhirlWhat they're describing sounds about right tho. Currently you need to consider that you have drivers running in the background that are not just drivers but also include user-facing elements which probably no longer use small memory footprint but instead use rather memory-heavy frameworks, Microsoft Edge is permanently running if you have Game Bar, then there's the Widgets stuff that are basically another Edge browser running, if you're using Onedrive that's another thing that's running in the background, and the stuff just piles on and on.
Edge is cancer, agreed (unless it's your preferred browser and all you need). The rest of the bloat should basically be removed either manually or though careful selection of OS version.
Posted on Reply
#19
SetsunaFZero
Does not affect my Work notebook, still the same at idle. I guess it only affects low mem Systems or some of our Company GPOs is blocking this.
Onasi@zaku49
Thank you for this educational post on the matters I already am aware on. It will also
use memory more aggressively the more the system has of it, yea. Problem is - cached memory set is separate, it’s not what is displayed in the actively used number.
Like, it’s right there. On the screenshot from Task Manager in this very news article. It’s not the cache. It’s ostensibly an idling system using almost 10 gigabytes. In no world is this normal and is absolutely NOT a usual Win 11 behavior in my experience.
Totally normal for Enterprise Notebooks / PCs
Posted on Reply
#20
SleepDart
dgianstefaniUnused RAM is wasted RAM. People do obsess over using minimal amounts, and while there is some logic to that regarding CPU usage etc. It doesn't really matter if the application is cached in RAM when not used, then ends up used, or it isn't used, something else is, and it's removed from cache to make space for that other thing.

There's no significant inherent advantage in having x amount of empty RAM space, beyond fewer CPU handles, unless the RAM ISN'T freed up if it's needed for something not cached etc, but mostly the benefit in theory would be that you don't first have to unload something, to load something else. That happens on the order of nanoseconds though. Selective suspend means that the application in RAM is also using mimimal/no CPU resources most of the time, and springs into action if needed.

I do think people should chase reducing CPU handles/load, alongside network optimisation and reduction of bloat, than trying to keep as much free RAM as possible for no other reason than chasing smallest numbers possible.


Edge is cancer, agreed (unless it's your preferred browser and all you need). The rest of the bloat should basically be removed either manually or though careful selection of OS version.
"Unused RAM is wasted RAM" You need to have more than you need, to evade issue related to your SSD becoming a paper weight.
Posted on Reply
#21
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
SleepDart"Unused RAM is wasted RAM" You need to have more than you need, to evade issue related to your SSD becoming a paper weight.
Yeah but what you "need" doesn't always take into account the allocated RAM, or the cached stuff you aren't using, so it's misleading to look at system resources, see "10 GB used" out of 16 GB, and in reality it's 5 GB of actual stuff in use, and 5 GB of stuff the OS thinks you "might" use. The outcome, if you end up "needing" 15 GB, isn't that the total RAM usage becomes 15 GB + 5 GB (the cached), what happens is the cached stuff you weren't using unloads itself and you end up with 15/16 GB (actually) used.

I understand your point about reducing SWAP usage, and that's valid. I guess the point I'm making is that not much is being swapped and written to SSD, unless it was actively used software. A cached application already has a copy on the drive, so there's nothing to swap, and if it's new data that needs swapping, well, that was something you were actually using then, wasn't it?

The point I'm making is that out of x "used" memory, a large proportion of it wasn't actually "used", it's just ready for use in a way that doesn't require it to first be loaded into RAM. Since, again, unused RAM is wasted RAM, and the OS is actually pretty smart about this stuff.
Posted on Reply
#22
matar
10GB idle RAM usage even 7Gb is high
Windows 10 average 4GB idle RAM
Posted on Reply
#23
FanlessOC
Linux also uses memory to cache disk contents, but that memory is reported as "free" because the system uses a caching algorithm that uses the free memory as disk cache. Because of that, when an application asks for the amount of free memory, it is correctly reported, despite most of the free memory actually being in use as cache. It is reported as free memory none the less, because as soon as an application wants it, it's is there, free, available, and the cached contents are just dropped to "free" up the memory that was already being reported as freely available, but under the hood in use as cache.

You know, the way a proper engineer would design it.
Posted on Reply
#24
Dr. Dro
OnasiThe fuck are those idle numbers? My system is at, like, 2.5 gigs at idle with 32 gigs of RAM. What are those systems even doing to idle at 10? Before someone brings up browser tabs - I don’t consider that being “idle”. To me, and AFAIK to any sensible person, “idle Windows” is what the OS uses showing the desktop after a clean boot and a couple of minutes to finish up all startup scheduled tasks to reach steady memory state. As far as that definition goes, I have never seen a competently ran Windows install that would consume 10 gigabytes of fucking RAM.
Seems like S.S.D.D. here and this is a day old 26H2 install

Posted on Reply
#25
Hecate91
I can tell some have never used a stock install of W11, it absolutely is possible for the OS to eat 8-10GB of RAM for no good reason. The OS caching a crap load of RAM is only "good" if you have way more ram than you need, and we're obviously in a time where you wouldn't want ram being eaten by Microslop bloat.
For me on another system with a unmodified W11 install, no difference with with 26H2.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 14th, 2026 10:49 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts