Monday, March 6th 2017

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Overclocked Beyond 2 GHz Put Through 3DMark

by
btarunr
 Discuss (72 Comments)
An NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti reference-design graphics card was overclocked to 2062 MHz core, and 11404 MHz (GDDR5X-effective) memory, and put through the 3DMark suite. The card was able to sustain its overclock without breaking a sweat, with its core temperature hovering around 63°C. Apparently, the card's power-limit was manually set to 122%, to sustain the overclock. In the standard FireStrike benchmark (1080p), the card churned up graphics scores of 31,135 points, followed by 15,093 points in FireStrike Extreme (1440p), and 7,362 points in the 4K Ultra HD version of the benchmark, FireStrike Ultra. The card also scored 10,825 points in the TimeSpy DirectX 12 benchmark. Overall, the card falls within 30-40% performance of an overclocked GTX 1080.
Sources: ChipHell, VideoCardz

Related News

Add your own comment

72 Comments on GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Overclocked Beyond 2 GHz Put Through 3DMark

#1
ZoneDymo
so basically it all stays the same, the GTX1080ti is on average 35% better, and overclocked...still the same.
Wonder if Nvidia put the same overclocking restriction on this card or if this one is free to clock to the actual card's limit.

Also do I really have to google this or how close is this score to the Titan X Pascal's?
Posted on Reply
#2
Basard
AMD should have never bought ATI......
Posted on Reply
#3
Ascalaphus
Sweet! So pretty much about the same as my dual 980tis @ 1400mhz.

www.3dmark.com/fs/7313421

the 1080 ti is only about 1000 points off.
Impressive.
Definitely sealed my purchase.
Posted on Reply
#5
ZoneDymo
BasardAMD should have never bought ATI......
yeah a lot of companies should not have bought other companies because I know the world would be a better place if they did not...
Posted on Reply
#6
xorbe
"The card was able to sustain its overclock without breaking a sweat"

Can someone translate that? I don't know why technical writers use such a vague phrase. It means nothing.
Posted on Reply
#7
RejZoR
BasardAMD should have never bought ATI......
That's what you think, because you have a very narrow view at this. But AMD had a much wider perspective when they bought ATI back then. They now have a blend of CPU and GPU capabilities where NVIDIA is stuck with GPU only. And while that works, it's questionable for the future. Not to mention AMD took over entire console ecosystem and with Ryzen, they'll be taking over workstations and servers. Depending on what AMD RX Vega will turn out to be, things will go in their favor as well. And so far it's looking very good despite everything.
Posted on Reply
#8
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
AMD haven't got a hope in hell with Vega.

And no, I'm no NVIDIA fanboy. Nothing could be better than having AMD leapfrog NVIDIA as that would really hot up competition and give us great products at reasonable prices.

Just look at Ryzen: so much excitement and hype before release, but all a bit meh once we knew what it could do and the forums went quiet.
Posted on Reply
#9
NicklasAPJ
ZoneDymoso basically it all stays the same, the GTX1080ti is on average 35% better, and overclocked...still the same.
Wonder if Nvidia put the same overclocking restriction on this card or if this one is free to clock to the actual card's limit.

Also do I really have to google this or how close is this score to the Titan X Pascal's?
here is my TItan X Pascal overclocked.

hwbot.org/submission/3478669_nicklas0912_3dmark___time_spy_titan_x_pascal_10984_marks

Almost same clocks, so clock for clock Titan X Pascal bring out a little more fps.
Look GPU score, he use 6950x, I use 6900K.
Posted on Reply
#10
zo0lykas
wait few months :) HBM2 is coming
BasardAMD should have never bought ATI......
Posted on Reply
#11
P4-630
zo0lykaswait few months :) HBM2 is coming
We might need HBM3 to catch up.....
Posted on Reply
#12
bug
BasardAMD should have never bought ATI......
If AMD didn't have ATI to prop them up, they'd probably gone under during the Bulldozer days. But yes, overall today both companies together are valued below what AMD paid for ATI.
xorbe"The card was able to sustain its overclock without breaking a sweat"

Can someone translate that? I don't know why technical writers use such a vague phrase. It means nothing.
It's explained in the very phrase that you quoted (incompletely): at those speeds, the card got only barely warmer. Which in turn means there's hope for significantly higher overclocking.
Posted on Reply
#13
NicklasAPJ
AscalaphusSweet! So pretty much about the same as my dual 980tis @ 1400mhz.

www.3dmark.com/fs/7313421

the 1080 ti is only about 1000 points off.
Impressive.
Definitely sealed my purchase.
www.3dmark.com/3dm/17479464 My titan can beat it, even have a score with 33k GPU score. I I just need to update.
Posted on Reply
#14
RejZoR
qubitAMD haven't got a hope in hell with Vega.

And no, I'm no NVIDIA fanboy. Nothing could be better than having AMD leapfrog NVIDIA as that would really hot up competition and give us great products at reasonable prices.

Just look at Ryzen: so much excitement and hype before release, but all a bit meh once we knew what it could do and the forums went quiet.
From what I know about Vega, things are looking very good actually. I don't think it'll dominate GTX 1080Ti, but I think it'll generally match it pretty well.
Posted on Reply
#16
NicklasAPJ
P4-630
No heart smileys on this site :(? <3
Posted on Reply
#17
P4-630
NicklasAPJNo heart smileys on this site :(? <3
LOL! :D
Posted on Reply
#18
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
RejZoRFrom what I know about Vega, things are looking very good actually. I don't think it'll dominate GTX 1080Ti, but I think it'll generally match it pretty well.
I sincerely hope so.
Posted on Reply
#19
GhostRyder
ZoneDymoso basically it all stays the same, the GTX1080ti is on average 35% better, and overclocked...still the same.
Wonder if Nvidia put the same overclocking restriction on this card or if this one is free to clock to the actual card's limit.

Also do I really have to google this or how close is this score to the Titan X Pascal's?
I don't have a screenshot as I have not run it in awhile, but the score is just a bit above what my overclocked Titan XP will do. Mine will not maintain the boost frequency consistently (due to power constraints) over 2000mhz but stays in the upper 1900mhz range. So essentially at the end its not that much different than my Titan XP and just gets up to the 2000+mhz range.

Still cool, I may still swap mine out just because of how cheaper it is.
Posted on Reply
#20
NicklasAPJ
GhostRyderI don't have a screenshot as I have not run it in awhile, but the score is just a bit above what my overclocked Titan XP will do. Mine will not maintain the boost frequency consistently (due to power constraints) over 2000mhz but stays in the upper 1900mhz range. So essentially at the end its not that much different than my Titan XP and just gets up to the 2000+mhz range.

Still cool, I may still swap mine out just because of how cheaper it is.
Mabye you just lost the silicon lotty? mine run fine at 2050/2063Mhz. and score better than the Ti at 2062Mhz.
Posted on Reply
#22
P4-630
Spread the :love:!!!!

:peace:
Posted on Reply
#23
RejZoR
I :love: Radeon

Sorry, I just had to :D
Posted on Reply
#24
D1RTYD1Z619
If AMD can come close in performance and under cut Nvidia like they did to Intel they will sell a shit ton of Vega cards.
Posted on Reply
#25
Captain_Tom
D1RTYD1Z619If AMD can come close in performance and under cut Nvidia like they did to Intel they will sell a shit ton of Vega cards.
Hope we get more concrete leaks on Vega 10 soon.

At this point I am expecting it to trade blows with the 1080 Ti for $600.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 29th, 2024 03:38 EDT change timezone

Latest GPU Drivers

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts