Wednesday, October 24th 2018

AMD Share Price Falls ~28% via Weak GPU Sales; Revenue Share from GPUs Only 30%

Following the release of theQ3 financial results by AMD, the stock market was quick to respond to less-than-expected operating income and market share numbers with a ~9.2% drop in share price before the markets closed. This was then followed by fervent after-hours trading resulting an even bigger drop to a share price of $17.88 at the time of this post, compared to the starting value of $25.04 earlier today. The small hike and drop after-hours also indicates some enterprising parties made use of the lower share values to their profit.

AMD held a teleconference for their investors to go along with the report, and attempted to better explain what was going on. In particular, they attribute the decreased client GPU sales to a big decrease in the blockchain GPU sales market (read GPU mining) relative to the first half of 2018. The lack of competing products to take on NVIDIA Pascal-, and then Turing-based, GPU solutions also does not help. As it stands, AMD shared news that GPUs now contribute to only ~30% of their revenue with the other 70% coming from the Ryzen-based processor division instead. They hinted strongly at new products coming from both segments, including an on-track path for a 7 nm datacenter GPU later this year and new Ryzen+Vega-powered notebooks, but it appears that more needs to be done to appease their investors at this point.
Add your own comment

58 Comments on AMD Share Price Falls ~28% via Weak GPU Sales; Revenue Share from GPUs Only 30%

#26
Turmania
Lets be honest, AMD basically crippled gamers side on their GPU series. They went for Mining market and got some good sales from that side. but when that market has blown up. they are back to square one a square they neglected for some time, and now it is hurting them.
They need to come fresh to the GPU market with Navi and win back gamers, sooner the better. Personally if you ask me, they can delay the CPU launch a bit further to bring forward GPU launch. Rumour has it 1st half of 2019 will be cpu, 2nd hald GPU. which should be otherway around or lauch both same time at 1st quarter.
Posted on Reply
#27
zelnep
Stock volatility should be ignored in this market, today -9% "omg, sell now", tomorrow +15% "strong buy" (from same analysts*), but what about real AMD reported results, the Q3 2018 is the same as Q3 2017, I did expect more! it is not like there were mining craze in Q2-Q3 2017.
Posted on Reply
#28
medi01
zelnepthe Q3 2018 is the same as Q3 2017
Margins are up, income is up, revenue is up.
Other than that "the same".
Posted on Reply
#29
bug
Ok, so GPU business is down because the crypto craze is over.
But wasn't AMD making tons of cash since they stopped competing at the high end, because money's at the mid segment?
Posted on Reply
#30
Th3pwn3r
TheLostSwedeIf Nvidia was going up, fair enough, but they've dropped by quite a lot as well, most likely based on the crypto market news for GPUs.
Now where are all you goofs who disagreed with those of us that said the great numbers for AMD AND Nvidia were largely because of crypto? Still disagree?
Posted on Reply
#31
velizar
medi01And that is a problem, because...

Isn't there some VERY IMPORTANT PIECE OF INFORMATION missing in this article, let alone with this misleading sentence pulled into the TITLE? Are you guys also playing with stock!??!!?

"GPU contribute only 3 0%" information is useless, without mentioning how much it was in the past.
Last time I've checked, Semi-custom was half of AMD's business... So, what, again>
well, its a very harsh misunderstandig. whats on the slides is : "Ryzen cpu more than 70% of client revenue" but it actually means client CPU revenue.
Posted on Reply
#32
Salty_sandwich
And then the release of the PS whatever and Xbox whatever, shares probs go back up?
Posted on Reply
#33
prtskg
TurmaniaThey need to come fresh to the GPU market with Navi and win back gamers, sooner the better. Personally if you ask me, they can delay the CPU launch a bit further to bring forward GPU launch. Rumour has it 1st half of 2019 will be cpu, 2nd hald GPU. which should be otherway around or lauch both same time at 1st quarter.
Lisa confirmed they already have datacenter wins for Vega 7nm and it will ship in this quarter.
"We remain on track to launch the industry's first 7-nanometer datacenter GPU this quarter. Customer interest in the product is strong based on its performance and differentiated feature set, and we have already secured multiple datacenter wins with shipments expected to begin in the fourth quarter. We continue to increase investments in GPU hardware and software to deliver industry-leading products that we believe will drive growth in the gaming, professional, and datacenter markets. "
seekingalpha.com/article/4214112-advanced-micro-devices-amd-q3-2018-results-earnings-call-transcript?part=single
She also confirmed Epyc 2 in 2019, almost hinted Navi in 2nd half of the year.
The reason they didn't do it your way is cpu section brings more money than gpu. For gpus to make money, a software environment is needed, which AMD doesn't have. Nvidia has been investing on such environment since 2007-08 and they reap the benefit till date.
medi01And that is a problem, because...

Isn't there some VERY IMPORTANT PIECE OF INFORMATION missing in this article, let alone with this misleading sentence pulled into the TITLE? Are you guys also playing with stock!??!!?

"GPU contribute only 3 0%" information is useless, without mentioning how much it was in the past.
Last time I've checked, Semi-custom was half of AMD's business... So, what, again>
30% of Computing and Graphics segment revenue. Last quarter it was 40%
seekingalpha.com/article/4214112-advanced-micro-devices-amd-q3-2018-results-earnings-call-transcript?part=single
Computing and Graphics segment revenue was $938 million .....Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-Custom segment revenue was $715 million.
Semi-custom is much less than half.
Posted on Reply
#34
bug
From what I've read elsewhere, analysts' worries are two-fold. On one hand AMD's growth in the server market has stalled (before gaining a significant piece of the pie). On the other, they apparently seem to have failed to capitalize on Intel's shortage of desktop CPUs.
So as much as we love to talk GPUs, apparently the blame lies where I'd least expect it.
Posted on Reply
#35
TheinsanegamerN
bugOk, so GPU business is down because the crypto craze is over.
But wasn't AMD making tons of cash since they stopped competing at the high end, because money's at the mid segment?
Nope. That was AMD's mouthpiece saying that, but when the geforce 1070, with fatter margins then the RX480, sells more then the 480, 470, and 460 put together, you know AMD wasnt swimming in profits.

Not releasing a 3072 core polaris was one of the dumbest things AMD ever did.
Posted on Reply
#36
Vya Domus
Th3pwn3rNow where are all you goofs who disagreed with those of us that said the great numbers for AMD AND Nvidia were largely because of crypto? Still disagree?
And that relates to this how ? News about the massive drop in crypto related sales occurred many months ago yet these shares have plummeted just now. You have no idea how out of touch most investors are, I can guarantee you a good chunk of them never gave a damn about how many GPUs AMD or Nvidia sold for crypto or were even aware of that distinction.
Posted on Reply
#37
Sasqui
lexluthermiesterTypical investor panic. The price will come back up.
Careful, you won't know the answer to that until next earnings release. They were both riding high on the crypto wave, and the market is completely saturated.

Personally, I wouldn't touch AMD or NVDA at the moment. I truly think the latter has been playing games with channel and inventory numbers and it's going to catch up to them.
Posted on Reply
#38
lexluthermiester
SasquiPersonally, I wouldn't touch AMD or NVDA at the moment.
Why, this is a golden opportunity to make some money. The values of both companies will come back up. Buy low, sit on it and earn dividends or sell when the price goes high.
Posted on Reply
#39
Sasqui
lexluthermiesterWhy, this is a golden opportunity to make some money. The values of both companies will come back up. Buy low, sit on it and earn dividends or sell when the price goes high.
Keep in mind that these are all opinions and either of us could be right on that call. One thing they don't have going for them at the moment is the overall market, so there could be some gains coming back if things settle down.

However, there's no way to know until 3 months from now where both companies are really headed in terms of revenue, so buying now is a a total gamble. I would not put my money on either at the moment.
Posted on Reply
#40
Assimilator
Hmmm... if I was an investor, I'd be pretty worried that AMD is essentially yielding the high-end discrete GPU market to NVIDIA. Especially since AMD had been so competitive in that arena for so long, even with far fewer resources than NVIDIA. Especially since Intel is supposedly launching its own dGPU in 2020 and has poached people like Raja to make it happen.
Posted on Reply
#41
lexluthermiester
AssimilatorEspecially since Intel is supposedly launching its own dGPU in 2020 and has poached people like Raja to make it happen.
AMD allowed him to be "poached". Everyone working in the tech industry agrees to a non-competition clause when employed. AMD did not have to let him go work for Intel. They allowed it. So either they don't need him or wanted to replace him.

Either way, my suspicion is that AMD is gearing up for something. They have Zen2 coming very soon and I'm betting they have a new GPU line coming to answer RTX.
Posted on Reply
#42
tvamos
People only see this as GPU sales decrease, but how much have their CPU sales increase with (Ry)zen? That also brings this percentage down, right?
Posted on Reply
#43
Salty_sandwich
If I was AMD I would get rid of the GPU side of the company (but maybe just keep the APU side of the IP) and just focus all efforts on CPU , that would give the Nvidia fans something else to be happy about :)
Posted on Reply
#44
gamerman
noyhing new and just what except.

amd has not anyhting really good product.

and 2020 when intel coming gpu market amd are very tight situation.,bcoz intel release their 1st gpu and also soon coming even better cpus for market.

amd must satrt build good product and not only release average useless jusnk and then ask low price,its not wokr anymore.

2020 is d-day for amd.
Posted on Reply
#45
John Naylor
It's not like the writing hasn't been on the wall .... inverstors should get a good understanding of "pump and dump" before investing after reading on line blogs. "ooh ooh more cores yeah its gonna be a winner"..... problem is 98% of folks didn't need more cores. And after the intial post Ryzen excitement, AMD market share decreased from 22.3% in Q3 2017 to 20.9% in Q3 2018. So why you ask ? .... Reality has set in
Posted on Reply
#46
Th3pwn3r
Vya DomusAnd that relates to this how ? News about the massive drop in crypto related sales occurred many months ago yet these shares have plummeted just now. You have no idea how out of touch most investors are, I can guarantee you a good chunk of them never gave a damn about how many GPUs AMD or Nvidia sold for crypto or were even aware of that distinction.
You need to learn how slopes work.
Posted on Reply
#47
Gasaraki
FluffmeisterIt's ironic, AMD are now in the position where they actually have a competitive product on the market, so the market expects bigger profits.

Posting a loss... less than expected doesn't please the shareholders anymore.
In the past the GPU market kept the money coming in because the CPU side sucked. Now the GPU side is falling yet CPUs have not increased at a fast enough rate.
Posted on Reply
#48
bug
GasarakiIn the past the GPU market kept the money coming in because the CPU side sucked. Now the GPU side is falling yet CPUs have not increased at a fast enough rate.
That is why one diversifies, isn't it?
Posted on Reply
#49
Gasaraki
Salty_sandwichIf I was AMD I would get rid of the GPU side of the company (but maybe just keep the APU side of the IP) and just focus all efforts on CPU , that would give the Nvidia fans something else to be happy about :)
Thanks AMD for buying ATi and then destroying them.
Posted on Reply
#50
bug
GasarakiThanks AMD for buying ATi and then destroying them.
As I've posted above, the GPU division kept the CPU division afloat during Bulldozer days, now the tables have turned.
And while it's true buying ATI cost AMD quite a few pennies, AMD's really bad move was selling the Imageon division to Qualcomm. That would have raked in a lot more cash, but we don't know if AMD could have survived without selling at that point.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 08:24 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts