Thursday, October 31st 2019

AMD CEO Lisa Su Talks About 3rd Gen Ryzen Boost Issue in Q3 Earnings Call

AMD CEO Dr Lisa Su in response to a question, spoke about 3rd generation Ryzen processor boost issue. Dr. Su was responding to a question by Mitch Steves of RBC Capital on whether she had comments on "the software side" of 3rd gen Ryzen, and articles in the press still popping up about them despite AMD's fix. This was interpreted by the AMD CEO as a question specific to the Precision Boost controversy surrounding 3rd gen Ryzen chips, in which processors would seldom/never hit the advertised maximum boost frequency. AMD tried to address this by issuing updates to its processor microcode under AGESA Combo 1.0.0.3 ABBA, distributed through motherboard BIOS updates. The new microcode is supposed to increase the maximum turbo clock-speeds for "the vast majority" of users.

In her response, Dr. Su began by stating that the company is pleased with the sales of these processors. She then mentioned that AMD is working with its motherboard partners and ODM partners to "improve the optimization of the maximum boost frequency." She notes that the issue has been "largely addressed over the last couple of weeks" (referring to 1.0.0.3 ABBA). She goes on to state that AMD sees its response to the boost issues as more of an "optimization," rather than a "major update," possibly trying to allay investor fears that AMD is firefighting a costly problem with its products. "We're going to continue to improve the platform," she adds, possibly referencing the upcoming AGESA 1.0.0.4 Patch B microcode that's beginning to ship out by motherboard vendors. The earnings call can be accessed here. The specific question can be found at 47:00.
Add your own comment

32 Comments on AMD CEO Lisa Su Talks About 3rd Gen Ryzen Boost Issue in Q3 Earnings Call

#26
TheGuruStud
ABBA really does work. 4.4/4.175 and I haven't done anything except pbo and 5x scalar.

That's pretty good for 200 dollars (even less now) 3600. It was good at stock, too, on release 4.2/4.0
Posted on Reply
#29
EarthDog
neatfeatguyif it was a circumstance beyond their sight and scope of testing they did.
I simply find it incredibly hard to believe this was missed with so many not being able to reach specs. In every circumstance of testing they never saw it happen...even though more than half of 2600+ respondents did across their entire line on various motherboards and setups?

Again, it isnt a huge deal, but I dont know how it could have been missed in testing that a lot of the chips didnt behave as they should.
Posted on Reply
#30
evernessince
TheLostSwedeOf course. If you've ever been to any meeting/conference where you have financial people, you'll find that they're the dumbest people in the room...
I've sat through far too many of those kind of events. The only thing more annoying are certain Germans at tech events, as they always try to prove that they know more than the company does about their own products...
I could not agree more. It is startling how little tech investors know about their own stocks.
Posted on Reply
#32
medi01
DeathtoGnomesyes and no, its an assumption, just how wrong can those go? :roll: :rolleyes:


have you looked at the date on that?
Have you checked NV stock price point from which it crashed? It is still in dips.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 9th, 2024 17:24 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts