Monday, April 20th 2020

Intel Core i7-10700K and i5-10600K Geekbenched, Inch Ahead of 3800X and 3600X

The week has begun with sporadic leaks about Intel's upcoming 10th generation Core "Comet Lake-S" desktop processor family, be it pictures of various socket LGA1200 motherboards, or leaked performance scores. Thai PC enthusiast TUM_APISAK posted links to Geekbench V4 entries of a handful 10th gen Core processors. These include the Core i7-10700K (8-core/16-thread), and the Core i5-10600K (6-core/12-thread). Comparisons with incumbent AMD offerings are inescapable. The i7-10700K locks horns with the Ryzen 7 3800X, while the i5-10600K takes the battle to the Ryzen 5 3600X.

The Core i7-10700K scores 34133 points in the multi-core test, and 5989 in the single-core one. The i5-10600K, on the other hand, puts out 28523 points in the multi-threaded test, and 6081 points in the single-core test. Both scores appear to be a single-digit percentage ahead of the AMD rivals in the multi-threaded test. The Intel chips appear to offer slightly better less-parallelized performance owing to higher boost frequencies for single-threaded or less parallelized workloads. These include an impressive 5.10 GHz max boost frequency for the i7-10700K, and 4.80 GHz for the i5-10600K. APISAK also posted scores of the iGPU-disabled Core i5-10600KF, which is roughly on par with the i5-10600K since it's basically the same chip with its eyes poked out.
Source: TUM_APISAK (Twitter)
Add your own comment

80 Comments on Intel Core i7-10700K and i5-10600K Geekbenched, Inch Ahead of 3800X and 3600X

#76
Braggingrights
Can't say money is a factor for me, it's like a hobby, you don't care about value, you just want it perfect
Posted on Reply
#77
goodeedidid
In reality those test don't mean nothing and I don't think anybody cares at all except the rumor sites that look for such information. At the end of the day good optimization and low temps are the most important factor. I wanna run something powerful without using custom water cooling like it's 2012.
Posted on Reply
#78
Braggingrights
Speaking of heat 7nm is a wonderful achievement, but lets not make out they are running cool, far from it
Posted on Reply
#79
RandallFlagg
goodeedididIn reality those test don't mean nothing and I don't think anybody cares at all except the rumor sites that look for such information. At the end of the day good optimization and low temps are the most important factor. I wanna run something powerful without using custom water cooling like it's 2012.
Have to agree with this in essence. Most benchmarks are being used because they are free, but these only test one aspect of a system. In this case, geekbench is of course entirely about the CPU itself. But very few real-world workflows just use the CPU. CPU is fine and all, but in the real world it can be crippled by a crap chipset or inefficient use of RAM.

I much prefer to see PCMark for a system. However, that bench costs money, and requires anyone using it to have knowledge the overall system build when comparing. It's reputation was hurt by some really stupid testing methodologies in the past - like people comparing a 16Gig RAM system to an 8Gig RAM system, or systems with an SSD to ones with an HDD, then using those results to talk about CPU or GPU.

That said, if you want to see how your *entire* build compares in an series of real-world uses, it's the best I know of.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 13:25 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts