Friday, May 15th 2020

GIGABYTE B550 AORUS Master Waltzes Around Chipset Limitations to Provide Three Gen 4 M.2 Slots

GIGABYTE B550 AORUS Master is the company's most premium socket AM4 motherboard based on the upcoming AMD B550 chipset. We described this board in some detail in our older article covering an assortment of top B550 motherboards from manufacturers, but missed a key bit. At the time we assumed that the PCI-Express lane switches located below the board's main PCI-Express slot merely split its x16 connection from the AM4 SoC down to two x8 connections to share between two slots, given that AMD allows multi-GPU (including SLI) with the B550. Apparently, the lane switches are there for a different, more fascinating reason.

A BenchLife.info report points to the possibility of all three M.2 slots on this motherboard having PCI-Express gen 4.0 wiring - something that shouldn't normally be possible, since all downstream PCIe lanes put out by the B550 are gen 3.0. The way we see it, the topmost M.2 slot has a direct PCI-Express 4.0 x4 connection from the AM4 socket (as it normally should). The second- and third slots, however, pull their wiring from a series of lane switches that split the main x16 PEG slot to gen 4.0 x8/x4/x4. It's possible that one of the two x16 (electrical x4) slots has a further lane sharing arrangement with one of the two M.2 slots.
When paired with a "Matisse" or "Vermeer" processor, the main PEG slot will run at full x16 bandwidth until one of the bottom two M.2 slots is populated, at which point the x8/x4/x4 configuration is engaged. When paired with a "Renoir" APU, however, it's likely that the bottom two M.2 slots are completely disabled, since the APU only spares 8 lanes toward PEG, which make up the first 8 (permanent) lanes on the PEG slot. The B550 chipset's 8-lane PCIe gen 3.0 budget is spent driving the board's various onboard controllers (except HD Audio, which is wired to the CPU), and one of the x16 (electrical x4) slots. GIGABYTE is expected to launch the B550 AORUS Master sometime mid-June, 2020.
Source: BenchLife.info
Add your own comment

39 Comments on GIGABYTE B550 AORUS Master Waltzes Around Chipset Limitations to Provide Three Gen 4 M.2 Slots

#26
Shou Miko
I am gonna wait to see what Buildzoid says about the VRM on this board before I decide to change out my MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon AC.

I really hope MSI brings back the Arctic theme for their Mortar or Tomahawk board because then I am totally gonna buy that one :rolleyes:
Posted on Reply
#27
Caring1
puma99dk|I really hope MSI brings back the Arctic theme for their Mortar or Tomahawk board because then I am totally gonna buy that one :rolleyes:
I'm waiting for the Arctic or Titanium, preferably a "Max" version as the base for a strong build.
Posted on Reply
#28
Shou Miko
Caring1I'm waiting for the Arctic or Titanium, preferably a "Max" version as the base for a strong build.
Oh yeah I forgot about the Titanium :lovetpu:
Posted on Reply
#29
Basard
Gigabyte's killin it these days.....
Posted on Reply
#30
Imsochobo
TheLostSwedeThat really is a terrible manual. But yeah, it seems the manual contradicts the spec page... Good job Asrock...

This is going to be an insane mess for people to understand when they get a B550 board and wants to put things in all the slots, as people just expects it to work if there's a spare slot.
absolutely, it's not just asrock, it's for them all.
Publish diagrams like these, they Make them, you can usually ask them and done that several times and been served by msi, asus, asrock.

Posted on Reply
#31
TheLostSwede
News Editor
Imsochoboabsolutely, it's not just asrock, it's for them all.
Publish diagrams like these, they Make them, you can usually ask them and done that several times and been served by msi, asus, asrock.

Those used to included in the manuals many moons ago, I don't understand why they don't still do that.
Posted on Reply
#32
Darksword
I'm guessing this board will come in well over $200.00.
Posted on Reply
#33
TheLostSwede
News Editor
DarkswordI'm guessing this board will come in well over $200.00.
Based on?
I'm not saying it won't be over $200, but well over...
Posted on Reply
#34
gamefoo21
TheLostSwedeBased on?
I'm not saying it won't be over $200, but well over...
Aorus Master boards are all premium as they can get away with.

In Canada I wholly expect this board to sit at $300-350. The X570 Master sits at $500-550. That pricing makes sense honestly.

On another note...

I have tried to get board details out of Asrock and they ignored me. If I could get a schematic of my X570 TaiChi, I'd be really happy.
Posted on Reply
#35
Turmania
I never been a fan of Gigabyte mostly I go for MSI. But last year they opened a factory in Taiwan and started producing top tier items over there. So long story short, they have won a customer.over this move.
Posted on Reply
#36
EntropyZ
The board looks to be expensive, I mean they even provide a heatsink rather than a block of aluminum that has the surface area of a tiny paperweight.
Posted on Reply
#37
Adam Krazispeed
gamefoo21That's kinda like how it's done on some X570 boards.

They do: x16,0,0 - x8,x8,0 - x8,x4,x4

The trade off is that you get to use the m.2 x4 lanes without giving up the 1x slots *cough* MSI *cough* or your sata ports.

Honestly PCIe 3.0 is fast enough for most NVME drives. The only 4.0 drives that keep sustained speeds high enough cost Linus money and are add in card format.

Though if you add in a third slot device no SLI for you!
sli or cfx is dead any way for one, no application or game uses mult-gpu except for maybe 3d mark or some benching software, name one game form 2018 till present thats uses Multi-gpus?

Maybe one or two and 3d mark and bench-marking software doesn't count!!!!
Posted on Reply
#38
Decryptor009
Adam Krazispeedsli or cfx is dead any way for one, no application or game uses mult-gpu except for maybe 3d mark or some benching software, name one game form 2018 till present thats uses Multi-gpus?

Maybe one or two and 3d mark and bench-marking software doesn't count!!!!
I am personally glad it is dead, i remember pairing 480's in SLi, whilst yes it gave more performance, it looked worse visually than with a single card, could notice it was 2 cards rendering the image rather than 1, this is very off putting.

More frames =/= smoother experience.

This was with an i7 2700K too so these cards were not bottlenecked.
Posted on Reply
#39
Imsochobo
Decryptor009I am personally glad it is dead, i remember pairing 480's in SLi, whilst yes it gave more performance, it looked worse visually than with a single card, could notice it was 2 cards rendering the image rather than 1, this is very off putting.

More frames =/= smoother experience.

This was with an i7 2700K too so these cards were not bottlenecked.
There should not be any visual difference.
Not that there is any difference to what your conclusion is though, they look identical but the frame pacing, micro stutter and not to mention the "why isn't my 2nd gpu working"
Profiles, manually creating them and what not.
But visually there was no difference in my experience ever.
Adam Krazispeedsli or cfx is dead any way for one, no application or game uses mult-gpu except for maybe 3d mark or some benching software, name one game form 2018 till present thats uses Multi-gpus?

Maybe one or two and 3d mark and bench-marking software doesn't count!!!!
I'd install M2's in the other ports, all the M2's and run gpu at 8x.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 17:37 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts