Monday, August 17th 2020
Rumor: GeForce RTX 3090 Pricing to Arrive Around the $2,000 Mark
A user on ChipHell going by the alias Alienxzy posted a screenshot taken from an alleged insider account with information regarding plans for next-gen RTX 3090 as fabricated by NVIDIA's AIB partner Colorful. According to the original information, posted on ChipHell as a screenshot, Colorful will be releasing two high-end versions of the RTX 3090 graphics card, in the form of the Vulcan (air-cooled) and Neptune (hybrid cooling) models. According to it, and when the text is parsed through a translator, the tentative pricing for NVIDIA's next-gen is slated at CNY 13,999 (online selling) for the Vulcan X OC, and CNY 12,999 (again online selling) for the Neptune. These translate to roughly $2,000 for the high-end Vulcan X OC and (strangely, for a hybrid, water-cooled version) $1875 for the Neptune. Another pricing of CNY 12,000 is mentioned for the Vulcan ($1,730), so that might actually be the real pricing (and makes more sense compared to the Neptune).
Some more information is present on the rumor-mill-powering post, such as a 5 V RGB capability that pairs the graphics cards' lighting with that of the motherboard (and vice-versa), as well as improved in-card display for the Vulcan X; meanwhile, sales of the Neptune graphics card for the previous generation were reportedly low, which is why its pricing is reportedly being revised close to its introduction, which will be in the same ballpark of the Vulcan X OC. If true, this should set the pricing trend for NVIDIA's expected top offering in the RTX 3000 series, and it's creeping ever higher - the cost to have a generation's best performer is becoming more and more (insert descriptor here). Even considering NVIDIA's all but guaranteed Founders' Edition, we're looking at a steep pricing landscape. Do please note the rumor tag on the title of the news post, as this isn't confirmed information in any way or form. Images below for the Vulcan X and Neptune are merely representative of current generation's offerings.
Sources:
ChipHell, via TPU Forums user @ xkm1948
Some more information is present on the rumor-mill-powering post, such as a 5 V RGB capability that pairs the graphics cards' lighting with that of the motherboard (and vice-versa), as well as improved in-card display for the Vulcan X; meanwhile, sales of the Neptune graphics card for the previous generation were reportedly low, which is why its pricing is reportedly being revised close to its introduction, which will be in the same ballpark of the Vulcan X OC. If true, this should set the pricing trend for NVIDIA's expected top offering in the RTX 3000 series, and it's creeping ever higher - the cost to have a generation's best performer is becoming more and more (insert descriptor here). Even considering NVIDIA's all but guaranteed Founders' Edition, we're looking at a steep pricing landscape. Do please note the rumor tag on the title of the news post, as this isn't confirmed information in any way or form. Images below for the Vulcan X and Neptune are merely representative of current generation's offerings.
219 Comments on Rumor: GeForce RTX 3090 Pricing to Arrive Around the $2,000 Mark
for now my 1070 suffice, even a RX 5700 XT would be an upgrade. exactly ... well this is why i have a 399$ smartphone that can hold a candle to a 1200$ one in term of build quality .... in term of power ... errr ... ah whatever it's plenty enough already, it's a freaking phone :laugh:
I will NEVER pay more than $400 for a new graphics card. And for me to invest $400 on a piece of hardware, said card must offer me at LEAST twice the performance of my current 1070 Ti for that price and include a usable RTX / ray tracing option that I can take advantage of.
I'm using a Moto G Power that I paid $100. The one and only drawback that I can see is the lack of sharpness when taking photos, yes they are crap cameras. But I knew that when I bought the phone. Otherwise, Android 10 that it came with beats many of my friend's iPhone's 11 in terms of usability and functionality. My friend with the iPhone 11 was amazed by how fast I can multitask with Chrome. He said it works much faster than his iPhone, switching between multiple tabs and sharing things, etc. He tried to do the same and his iPhone was not allowing him to do any of the things that my Android did right in front of him.
People are clueless and just buy stuff because it's the latest and greatest, or because it's the cool brand or because of the higher status attached to that brand. Fools...
and my 399chf/$ phone is a TCL which sparks funny comment most of the time (not that well known in Switzerland albeit them being the one that were behind Blackberry and the OEM for Alcatel although they are well known for cheap well built affordable 4k TV) and they can't believe it's a sub 400 phone with "only a 60hz AMOLED panel that is not from LG or Samsung" and "Only a snapdragon 675" while having a gorilla glass 5 back and front with a full aluminum frame 128gb base storage (384gb total atm ) 6gb RAM 64mp main shooter (that do more than well) still has a 3.5mm jack and even sport a IR blaster, ofc there is some little hiccups (mainly a few app i usually use do not work with Android 10 but that's not TCL fault, unlike one of their main feature, aka the side smartkey, being dumbed down which is now a glorified "OK google button" and the sidebar app that keep force closing for nothing, but that's trivial )
a lot of brand are thinking themselves of going the "Apple's way" and think it's a good idea ...
GPU's are being designed HPC first now (max profit center) - and then cut to the bone TDP for mobile parts second. Performance gaming is a marketing spun 3rd where they try and convince you that paying the same $400 today for a 2060 Super is somehow a worthy upgrade from the over-inflated $400 you paid in 2016 for a GTX 1070. Yea that 13% is sure an upgrade you waited 4 years for. Radeon 5700XT at least gets you around 1080Ti when the drivers don't blow up. But that's still not a slam dunk "next generation of performance."
We're losing new generations of gamers to mobile phones and tablets. PC gaming still had a hook where IF ... if you were okay with dealing with Windows etc. and were open to messing with things out of the box (like mods to games) that hey ignoring the cost of the base PC itself (maybe subsidized by parents) if you spent out $400 investment in the PC vs. saving for the latest gen console - you had absolute performance dominance over any other platform. You put up with the cost/complication of PC gaming because PC could provide the definitive gaming experience for a given title.
Now days if an actual upgrade for a GPU costs greater than $700 - which I mean a performance upgrade greater than 50% from 5 years ago... screw it. It might as well not exist.
It's a fail to me when you spend $500+ for a 2070Super which is THE SAME perf as a 1080Ti from 2017. RTX ray-tracing will only be relevant when it can perform.
You have a generation of gamers who can justify spending that $700+ on a new mobile device rather than some old archaic PC box that did them no favors growing up because that crap was too expensive.
It's pretty pathetic when yes mobile market has become the dominate market vs traditional desktop PC's. Yea because what is there to draw people "away" or should I say give up portability for a desktop? It used to be AFFORDABLE performance. But if the only things you hear about that are better than your current IGP or overTDPed dGPU with cheezed VRAM cost over $1000 PER PART then I don't blame people for writing off desktop gaming.
2080 Ti in 2018: "1200USD/EUR, well, it's not that bad"
This with the 2000USD/EUR pricing, the same people will buy these like sheep. And I thought that people buying over 1000EUR/USD smartphones are idiots..
Not sure anyone realizes the titan rtx is 2400.us :-)
I found it weird that some people actually bought Titan X (P or Xp) since the difference between 1080 Ti and those are so small, few shaders and 1GB VRAM & 32bit more bandwith.
2k for 3080Ti is cheap. I hope it's 2.2k.