Thursday, June 24th 2021

ASUS Announces ROG Strix XG43UQ Xbox Edition Monitor

Updated by
btarunr
 Updated: Discuss (20 Comments)
ASUS today released the ROG Strix XG43UQ Xbox Edition, a large 43-inch monitor that's designed for competitive gameplay in the living room. The monitor comes with a native resolution of 4K Ultra HD (3840 x 2160 pixels), and is capable of 144 Hz refresh-rate, and has DisplayHDR 1000. ASUS worked with Microsoft to optimize the monitor for the Xbox Series X/S consoles, and packed the monitor with an "Xbox Mode," which optimizes it for Xbox gameplay. Other features that add to its gaming prowess include Extreme Low Motion Blur (ELMB) Sync, AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, and 1 ms response time (MPRT). The VA panel features a matte anti-glare surface. Display inputs include DisplayPort 1.4, and two HDMI 2.1.

Update Jun 25th: ASUS listed the monitor for USD $1,399, with October 2021 availability.

Related News

Add your own comment

20 Comments on ASUS Announces ROG Strix XG43UQ Xbox Edition Monitor

#2
Ravenmaster
At £1299 the 48" LG C1 OLED shits all over this thing in every respect.
Posted on Reply
#3
Totally
RavenmasterAt £1299 the 48" LG C1 OLED shits all over this thing in every respect.
It's OLED, I'd rather not. Sure, other panels my not hold a candle in terms of image quality but reality issue of OLED panels always have them bringing up the rear for me. Degradation over time, and burn-in are a infinitely more noticeable than blacks not being inky or colors slightly not a vibrant.
Posted on Reply
#4
Tardian
RavenmasterAt £1299 the 48" LG C1 OLED shits all over this thing in every respect.
I totally agree. I love my 48" LG C1 OLED.
Posted on Reply
#5
Gmr_Chick
5 o'clock CharlieLooks like US pricing is $1,399.00. Release date is October 2021. Asus store link is below:
store.asus.com/us/item/202106AM180000001
Jesus, for that price, err....wouldn't it just be better to buy a nice TV and call it a day? :roll:

Asus/ROG needs to lay off the crack already.
Posted on Reply
#6
Caring1
Nice specs, pity about the ROG tax.
Posted on Reply
#7
Unregistered
RavenmasterAt £1299 the 48" LG C1 OLED shits all over this thing in every respect.
I have no idea why Monitors continue to be so expensive while using an old technology, while you can get a OLED.
TotallyIt's OLED, I'd rather not. Sure, other panels my not hold a candle in terms of image quality but reality issue of OLED panels always have them bringing up the rear for me. Degradation over time, and burn-in are a infinitely more noticeable than blacks not being inky or colors slightly not a vibrant.
I think you haven't used an OLED before, the difference is huge. And definitely aren't aware of progress in OLED technology, burn-in isn't a big risque anymore unless you abuse the TV, by abusing means you do it on purpose.
Posted on Edit | Reply
#8
Camm
Xex360I have no idea why Monitors continue to be so expensive while using an old technology, while you can get a OLED.

I think you haven't used an OLED before, the difference is huge. And definitely aren't aware of progress in OLED technology, burn-in isn't a big risque anymore unless you abuse the TV, by abusing means you do it on purpose.
When manufacturers like LG remove the 'not for professional use' warranty disclaimer that is essentially aimed at burn in, I'll contemplate using a OLED monitor.f

As is, I avoid using static content on my C9 as much as possible.
Posted on Reply
#9
Totally
Xex360I have no idea why Monitors continue to be so expensive while using an old technology, while you can get a OLED.

I think you haven't used an OLED before, the difference is huge. And definitely aren't aware of progress in OLED technology, burn-in isn't a big risque anymore unless you abuse the TV, by abusing means you do it on purpose.
Yes, the difference is huge when they're side by side, but on their own using something else isn't making you think "Gee, I wish this was an OLED" and no it still happens but not as bad as when it first arrived but not fixed to the point where someone has to go out of their way to make it happen, if care isn't taken forgetting to turn of the monitor before heading out work, or falling asleep at the desk is enough.
Posted on Reply
#10
simlife
Gmr_ChickJesus, for that price, err....wouldn't it just be better to buy a nice TV and call it a day? :roll:

Asus/ROG needs to lay off the crack already.
then go buy a "nice" tv the diffeance in screens now it the biggest in history its ever or will be been im currently on a 250 nits secondary monitor and a 2016 yes 2k 144 hrz monitor its sadly 350 nits but that was amazing for the time i want a 32-37 4k ideally for my updrade for pixel density but they are kinda rare.
Posted on Reply
#11
simlife
Xex360I have no idea why Monitors continue to be so expensive while using an old technology, while you can get a OLED.

I think you haven't used an OLED before, the difference is huge. And definitely aren't aware of progress in OLED technology, burn-in isn't a big risque anymore unless you abuse the TV, by abusing means you do it on purpose.
because monitors are still in the teens and 20s with bad specs 4k 144 with amazing actual specs is good... my parents are on a 19inch idk 250 nits prb 70 dci ish monitor as pervious hospital workers....
Posted on Reply
#12
john_
Monitor $399
+
ASUS logo $1000
=
$1399
Posted on Reply
#13
Chomiq
john_Monitor $399
+
ASUS logo $1000
=
$1399
Show me 43" 144 Hz monitor with HDMI 2.1, DP 1.4, local dimming and HDR1000 that costs $399.

Sure it's expensive but it's not far from other alternatives in the monitor market.
Posted on Reply
#14
john_
ChomiqShow me 43" 144 Hz monitor with HDMI 2.1, DP 1.4, local dimming and HDR1000 that costs $399.

Sure it's expensive but it's not far from other alternatives in monitor market.
Monitor $899
+
ASUS logo $500
=
$1399

Is it better now?
Posted on Reply
#17
Chomiq
john_Oh, nice. Another overpriced brand is compared to this overpriced brand. Please just agree to disagree. And if you like those monitors with those prices so much, just upgrade your little cheap Acer monitor. What do you mean no?
Want another?
www.newegg.com/black-acer-predator-cg7-cg437k-pbmiiippuzx-43/p/N82E16824011353
I'm able to give you two examples that show that this is what you actually have to pay for a monitor with similar spec? Also please show me where have I said that I like these prices?
Posted on Reply
#18
john_
ChomiqWant another?
www.newegg.com/black-acer-predator-cg7-cg437k-pbmiiippuzx-43/p/N82E16824011353
I'm able to give you two examples that show that this is what you actually have to pay for a monitor with similar spec? Also please show me where have I said that I like these prices?
You do realize that you are showing me, for example, the price of an RX 6900XT and you try to justify that price by showing me the price tag of an RTX 3080 TI, right?

So, are you buying any of those monitors you showed to me, or are you just hyping them? There are many people who hype ultra expensive hardware that they would never buy. Just asking.
Posted on Reply
#19
Rais
This is shooting flies with howitzers..such a monitor for consoles?
Posted on Reply
#20
Chrispy_
This isn't 2010, so 43" isn't big enough for a living room any more, especially not at that price which will get you an fantastic 65" 120Hz gaming display with VRR or something smaller and a decent sound system to go with it.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 19:06 EDT change timezone

Latest GPU Drivers

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts