Sunday, October 10th 2021

Windows 11 TPM Requirement? Bypass it in 5 Minutes

So you have a $2,000 Core i7-6950X HEDT processor, which you thought would last forever, but Windows 11 Setup stands in your way with its steep system requirements that include TPM and Secure Boot. What do you do? With Windows 11, Microsoft introduced new requirements for compatible hardware, and these are purely software-only checks—nothing really requires it. Besides the much-talked about TPM 2.0 spec compatible hardware Trusted Platform Module as a system requirement, there's also new requirements for UEFI Boot, and installation on a GPT partitioned drive (no more MBR boot for Windows 11).

While these requirements do make some sense going forward, this walls off a lot of potential users, i.e. everyone without a TPM 2.0 add-on card, or those with processors older than 7th Gen Intel Core "Kaby Lake," or AMD Ryzen 2000 "Pinnacle Ridge" series. We have discovered a quick and easy way to defeat these checks during Windows 11 Setup, including for that nagging TPM 2.0, and Secure Boot. Here's a step by step guide for fresh installations.

Update Oct 7th: At the end of this article, which is focused on "clean installation", we added a method that lets you perform the upgrade of an existing installation to Windows 11, without any TPM. For this same scenario Microsoft offers a method that downgrades the TPM requirement from 2.0 to 1.2, our method works without any TPM and also relaxes other requirements, like memory size, UEFI and MBR.

Update Oct 10th: Improved the steps for the "upgrade" installation, to mention that updates to the updater should be turned off.
Step 1: Create the Registry Modification
After preparing your installation media (on another PC), open Notepad, paste the text below, save this file as "bypass.reg" on the bootable USB flash drive that's serving as installation media for Windows 11. You can also put just this file alone on a separate USB stick, the Windows installation environment will show it as additional drive.
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\Setup\LabConfig]
"BypassTPMCheck"=dword:00000001
"BypassSecureBootCheck"=dword:00000001
"BypassRAMCheck"=dword:00000001
"BypassStorageCheck"=dword:00000001
"BypassCPUCheck"=dword:00000001
Copy and paste the text, including the "Window Registry Editor Version 5.00" part, it should look like in the screenshot below. Also, make sure to save as "bypass.reg" and not "bypass.reg.txt", which can happen if you use notepad and have "Show file extensions" turned off in Explorer (the default).
Step 2 Boot from that Installation Media USB Flash Drive
Now, simply boot from that USB flash drive, run Windows 11 Setup, and proceed until you hit the screen that says "This PC can't Run Windows 11."
Here, click on the "back" button of the wizard (top left of the window), which takes you back to the previous screen.

Step 3: Invoke a Command Prompt
Press "Shift+F10" on your keyboard. This opens a Command Prompt window. Type "regedit" and hit Enter.
Step 4: Get Registry Editor to Pick Up that Registry File You Made
With Registry Editor open, get it to import the "bypass.reg" file that's been sitting on your USB flash drive.

Step 5: Proceed with the Installation
That's it! Close all windows, and proceed with the installation.
What Happened Here
The Windows 11 installation media, much like that of Windows 10 and Windows 8 before it, is essentially a bootable "live CD" of a Windows environment, with a singular purpose of installing Windows, or attempting to Repair your Windows installation. Logically, this environment needs the tools for such repairs, including a Registry Editor and a Command Prompt. It also has its own Windows Registry, which tells it how to go about installing Windows. With this Registry mod, you're making the installer overlook multiple system requirements, meeting, including "TPM Check," which checks for a TPM 2.0 compliant module (or Firmware TPM), whether Secure Boot (and its dependency of a disabled CSM) are met.

If you need additional help, let us know in the comments,

Bypass TPM and other requirements for Update from within Windows
Start the Windows 11 update software, click "Change how setup downloads updates" and select "not right now", or disconnect from the Internet before pressing "Next". The reason is that there's now a new version of the updater that disables the "back" button on the "Unsupported Hardware" screen. Click "Next", after some checking, a screen "This PC doesn't currently meet Windows 11 system requirements" appears.
Now open the folder "C:\$WINDOWS.~BT\Sources" and look for the file "appraiserres.dll", delete the file. Make sure to delete the correct file, there's several "appraiser" files in that folder.
Return to the Windows 11 updater (no need to restart it), click "back", and "next", done.
Add your own comment

261 Comments on Windows 11 TPM Requirement? Bypass it in 5 Minutes

#176
chrcoluk
It wont be long I expect before ntlite allows the use of a custom win 11 installer ISO with the TPM 2.0 requirement pre configured.
Posted on Reply
#177
lexluthermiester
chrcolukIt wont be long I expect before ntlite allows the use of a custom win 11 installer ISO with the TPM 2.0 requirement pre configured.
That would be nice!
Posted on Reply
#178
scope54
W1zzard@scope54, you had a post which you deleted "Reason: Misunderstood directions". What was the issue? Maybe I can improve the wording in our article
@W1zzard
I had used the upgrade assistant and didn't understand to just download and run the iso. Once I went through it and realized that upgrade assistant wasnt doing the same the thing the article was detailing I tried the iso; mounted it and ran setup.
Posted on Reply
#179
svan71
I intentionally disabled TPM to keep that 11 garbage off my computer. I'll switch to linux before 2025
Posted on Reply
#180
xrobwx71
ZoneDymowell good to know perfectly capable hardware wont be e-waste if you do want to (hopefully eventually) upgrade to windows 11
Freaking genius! The right entity needs to accuse MS of being anti-green ie: See comment about e-waste, problem solved.
svan71I intentionally disabled TPM to keep that 11 garbage off my computer. I'll switch to linux before 2025
Have you tried Win 11 with or without TPM?
Posted on Reply
#181
mechtech
"So you have a $2,000 Core i7-6950X HEDT processor, which you thought would last forever, but Windows 11 Setup stands in your way with its steep system requirements that include TPM and Secure Boot. What do you do? "

Install Linux???
Keep Win10??
Posted on Reply
#182
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
I dont get why people cant just keep the OS they have.

What a strange sense of entitlement.
Posted on Reply
#183
lexluthermiester
MusselsI dont get why people cant just keep the OS they have.

What a strange sense of entitlement.
That's not it. Windows 10 is a crap GUI experience, the support of which will end. Additionally, not everyone wants to use and/or be limited by TPM and secureboot. So why should we be held back by pointless, useless and asinine limitations & requirements?
Posted on Reply
#184
ValenOne
ThrashZoneHi,
Still requires tpm 1.2 and ability to enable it
Or and operable tpm 1.2 chip or I suppose tpm 2.0 chip so scalpers rejoice.

Add image
I installed Windows 11 on Core i7 3770K equipped PC without TPM.
Posted on Reply
#185
lexluthermiester
rvalenciaI installed Windows 11 on Core i7 3770K equipped PC without TPM.
Nice! Any glitches?
Posted on Reply
#186
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
I have an intel Atom touchscreen system (screen is broken, HDMI out works) here that i wanted to throw W11 on, but it has no W10 x64 drivers so i'm worried it'd just die
I should just do a macrium backup and go balls to the wall

Edit: i'm going for it
Intel Atom Processor Z3745D 2M Cache up to 1.83 GHz

2GB ram, 32GB internal "SSD" (flash memory)
Posted on Reply
#187
lexluthermiester
Musselsbut it has no W10 x64 drivers so i'm worried it'd just die
I should just do a macrium backup and go balls to the wall
Windows 7 or 8 drivers will work fine. The Intel installer does not limit installation on new OS versions.
Posted on Reply
#188
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
lexluthermiesterWindows 7 or 8 drivers will work fine. The Intel installer does not limit installation on new OS versions.
No, i was worried it only had x86 drivers

Turns out it does, i'd been looking at another model with x64 support


x64 CPU, but the BIOS firmware wont boot UEFI or x64 windows installers
Posted on Reply
#189
lexluthermiester
Musselsx64 CPU, but the BIOS firmware wont boot UEFI or x64 windows installers
Weird. If you really really want to get 11 running on it, start a new thread and maybe we all can help you sort it out.
Posted on Reply
#190
lexluthermiester
lexluthermiesterWeird. If you really really want to get 11 running on it, start a new thread and maybe we all can help you sort it out.
Ignore the second "really". Brain-fart moment.

The following is why I like Jeff over at CraftComputing;

LOTS of good info here!!
Posted on Reply
#191
wlodar2wwa
HI,
i just installed Windows 11 as update from Win 7 after patching iso with Quick_11_iso_esd_wim_TPM_toggle script on intel i7, 2670QM 8 GB RAM (no TPM 1.2 and 2.0 and no secure boot).
Iso don`t work with rufus-3.17p, on a boot i got blank screen and few pixels on it.
Changing registry don`t do enything i had information about insufficient hardware requirements.
Win 11 works well on i7. Speed is better than on Win 10 but not as fast as the win 7.
There is no option to save all old programs, only users files, system password and etc...but old apps are still in theirs catalogs, weird...
Good job AveYo !!! :)
Posted on Reply
#192
theFOoL
See... WiN7 was the best IMO. 11 is getting there depending on who you ask ha
Posted on Reply
#193
lexluthermiester
theFOoLSee... WiN7 was the best IMO.
No one is arguing against that! So true!
Posted on Reply
#194
ARF
lexluthermiesterNo one is arguing that!
Well, someone would say that Windows XP is the best.
The OS blindly follow some trends of designs that are forced onto the users at the time of their launches.
For example, material design, minimalistic design, flat design, aero design, etc...

It's all relative but Windows 11 is a flop and no one is arguing that!
Posted on Reply
#195
theFOoL
ARFWell, someone would say that Windows XP is the best.
The OS blindly follow some trends of designs that are forced onto the users at the time of their launches.
For example, material design, minimalistic design, flat design, aero design, etc...

It's all relative but Windows 11 is a flop and no one is arguing that!
Can I just say the Luna theme which was apart of a beta of xp though M$ remove on final version though thank the Heavens a 3rd party app allow you to change

Edit: no it wasn't Luna but called.... "one min" it was shown on one of the Videos I linked here some time ago. The theme was classic but had 3 like boxes for minimize, max, close which I fell in love with
Posted on Reply
#196
ARF
theFOoLCan I just say the Luna theme which was apart of a beta of xp though M$ remove on final version though thank the Heavens a 3rd party app allow you to change

Edit: no it wasn't Luna but called.... "one min" it was shown on one of the Videos I linked here some time ago. The theme was classic but had 3 like boxes for minimize, max, close which I fell in love with
The general lightness and responsiveness, this thing can probably run just fine on a Duron / Athlon / Pentium II.
Posted on Reply
#197
lexluthermiester
ARFbut Windows 11 is a flop and no one is arguing that!
I am. I prefer it to 10 by far. Eff Windows 10.
Posted on Reply
#198
theFOoL
lexluthermiesterI am. I prefer it to 10 by far. Eff Windows 10.
Eh windows 10 until... UNTIL... M$ allows the functionality to the toolbar again to add status stuff. Everyone has there own options
Posted on Reply
#199
stinger608
Dedicated TPU Cruncher & Folder
I'm running 11 on a 4790K system with a GTX970 and it runs great.

I was a bit surprised at how well it runs and as others have said, it's a bit faster than 10.
Posted on Reply
#200
zlobby
stinger608I'm running 11 on a 4790K system with a GTX970 and it runs great.

I was a bit surprised at how well it runs and as others have said, it's a bit faster than 10.
What about drivers, though? AMD hid all their drivers for 'incompatible' HW from their website.

So, for example, there is no patch for the latency issues of the $L3, which would make bypassing the requirements pointless.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 16:27 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts