Monday, December 20th 2021

Lightelligence's Optical Processor Outperforms GPUs by 100 Times in Some of The Hardest Math Problems

Optical computing has been the research topic of many startups and tech companies like Intel and IBM, searching for the practical approach to bring a new way of computing. However, the most innovative solutions often come out of startups and today is no exception. According to the report from EETimes, optical computing startup Lightelligence has developed a processor that outperforms regular GPUs by 100 times in calculating some of the most challenging mathematical problems. As the report indicates, the Photonic Arithmetic Computing Engine (PACE) from Lightelligence manages to outperform regular GPUs, like NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 3080, by almost 100 times in the NP-complete class of problems.

More precisely, the PACE accelerator was tackling the Ising model, an example of a thermodynamic system used for understanding phase transitions, and it achieved some impressive results. Compared to the RTX 3080, it reached 100 times greater speed-up. All of that was performed using 12,000 optical devices integrated onto a circuit and running at 1 GHz frequency. Compared to the purpose-built Toshiba's simulated bifurcation machine based on FPGAs, the PACE still outperforms this system designed to tackle the Ising mathematical computation by 25 times. The PACE chip uses standard silicon photonics integration of Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI) for computing and MEMS to change the waveguide shape in the MZI.
Lightelligence Photonic Arithmetic Computing Engine Lightelligence Photonic Arithmetic Computing Engine
It is worth pointing out that this approach demonstrates that optical computation, more specifically Lightelligence's direction, is helpful for more sets of problems compared to "just" Artificial Intelligence. These computationally expensive classes of mathematical problems, like Ising, are often found in material science, thermodynamics, bioinformatics, cryptography, circuit design, power grid optimization, and much more.
Source: EETimes
Add your own comment

35 Comments on Lightelligence's Optical Processor Outperforms GPUs by 100 Times in Some of The Hardest Math Problems

#26
Vya Domus
Minus InfinityThere are thousands fields of science and engineering alone that would massively benefit from hardware that could solve certain classes of problems a 100x faster. They specifically don't use general purpose hardware for everything because they are too slow. The article specifically mentions "NP-complete class of problems". There are exist many such problems that have no efficient algorithms at all to solve them. These problems run in superpolynomial time which can be exponentially or factorially slow.
I fail to see what any of that has anything to do with what I said. The matter of the fact is "100 times faster than a GPU" is still a meaningless statement.
Minus InfinityThe article specifically mentions "NP-complete class of problems". There are exist many such problems that have no efficient algorithms at all to solve them. These problems run in superpolynomial time which can be exponentially or factorially slow.
It doesn't matter how fast the hardware is, those problems always remain prohibitively expensive to be put into practice.
TotallyDoes it matter if you only need it to do one thing?
No, but it's still dumb to make that comparison. I am sure that there are bits of silicon in a phone's SoC that compute specific things much faster than a GPU, that still doesn't mean anything in particular.
Posted on Reply
#27
Totally
Vya DomusNo, but it's still dumb to make that comparison. I am sure that there are bits of silicon in a phone's SoC that compute specific things much faster than a GPU, that still doesn't mean anything in particular.
In a resource limited scenario such as a phone, you're wrong that it doesn't matter because speed directly translates to a lower energy consumption. Hypothetically could that be the difference between 8h or 24h of battery life for that phone.
Posted on Reply
#28
Vya Domus
TotallyIn a resource limited scenario such as a phone, you're wrong that it doesn't matter because speed directly translates to a lower energy consumption. Hypothetically could that be the difference between 8h or 24h of battery life for that phone.
I don't know if you guys can't or don't want to understand what I am saying.

Comparing them is meaningless, when one says something is X times better than a GPU I expect it to be better at everything since that's a generic statement.
Posted on Reply
#29
Totally
Vya DomusI don't know if you guys can't or don't want to understand what I am saying.

Comparing them is meaningless, when one says something is X times better than a GPU I expect it to be better at everything since that's a generic statement.
That not the statement being made here. The statement is "something is X times better than a GPU at Y applications."
Posted on Reply
#30
Steevo
TotallyThat not the statement being made here. The statement is "something is X times better than a GPU at Y applications."
Since it cannot store data without exchanging photons for electron/electron potential the supporting hardware is going to be next to impossible to make faster than existing custom ASIC's for whatever code they threw at it or however they twisted the testing to attain the result they wanted. I want to see their testing methodology and descriptions, cause after reading up on it more it seems like a really fast photon sorting device that still requires the silicon hardware to make work. The only real speed up is the speed of light through optically transparent material VS the speed of EM propogation through copper and other metals used in current semiconductors.

Essentially they need to learn to trap light in a bottle to make this work any faster in real world applications.
Posted on Reply
#31
R-T-B
lexluthermiesterDo you not think it could be easily adapted? Given what's been stated, I think it would be trivial to recompile mining code to run on such a processor
not really, no. PoW mining relies on a hash function of some kind and as far as I can tell, this lacks any.
Posted on Reply
#32
lexluthermiester
R-T-Bnot really, no. PoW mining relies on a hash function of some kind and as far as I can tell, this lacks any.
Let be fair, there's not a lot to go on. However, the great thing about software is that it's flexible.
Posted on Reply
#33
dicobalt
Can they make a processor which will crash the crypto market by making it too easy to produce coin?
Posted on Reply
#34
bug
dicobaltCan they make a processor which will crash the crypto market by making it too easy to produce coin?
No.
Crypto is increasingly harder to mine the more you mine it. By design. No matter how much computing power you throw at it, you're going to hit a wall at some point.
Posted on Reply
#35
lexluthermiester
dicobaltCan they make a processor which will crash the crypto market by making it too easy to produce coin?
That would be funny!
bugNo.
Crypto is increasingly harder to mine the more you mine it. By design. No matter how much computing power you throw at it, you're going to hit a wall at some point.
This. No way around this fact.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 03:45 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts