Tuesday, December 20th 2022

NVIDIA Could Give TITAN RTX Another Swing as Maxed-Out AD102 in an Unabashed 4-slot Monstrosity

A report by Moore's Law is Dead claims that NVIDIA is preparing to launch a new TITAN RTX halo product, based on a maxed-out 4 nm "AD102" silicon. Where does this put the RTX 4090 Ti? Somewhere in between the RTX 4090 and the TITAN RTX Ada, as NVIDIA gave itself plenty of segmentation headroom with the AD102 silicon, by using just 128 out of 144 SM physically present on the silicon, besides the same 21 Gbps GDDR6X memory as the previous-generation. NVIDIA's options with the new TITAN RTX include enabling all 144 SM (18,432 CUDA cores), and using faster 24 Gbps memory, giving the silicon (1152 GB/s memory bandwidth), a stock power-limit closer to the 600 W design limit of the 12VHPWR power connector (RTX 4090 stock typical board power is 450 W).

Moore's Law is Dead also posted what they claim to be the first real-world pictures of the upcoming TITAN RTX Ada. The card is an unabashed 4-slot enlargement of the dual-axial flow-through RTX 4090 Founders Edition, with the cooler capable of higher thermal loads. TITAN RTX cards are marketed as first-party Founders Edition cards only, and not through NVIDIA's AIC board partners as custom-designs. A maxed out AD102, with higher clock speeds, higher power-limit, and faster memory, should be unassailable for custom-design RTX 4090 cards, if NVIDIA wants to sell this card at the kind of prices its last TITAN RTX product sold at—USD $2,500.
Sources: Moore's Law is Dead (YouTube), harukaze5719 (Twitter)
Add your own comment

91 Comments on NVIDIA Could Give TITAN RTX Another Swing as Maxed-Out AD102 in an Unabashed 4-slot Monstrosity

#76
Operandi
Time to ratify the PCIE graphics slot standard to support these cards. Huge GPU dies are not going away and with performance directly correlating with temperature these massive coolers are here to stay.
Posted on Reply
#77
ZoneDymo
man MLID still gets people talking huh? what a sad state of affairs.
Posted on Reply
#78
TheinsanegamerN
evernessinceWould be ironic if true. Can't tell you how certain individuals were saying the xx90 cards were Titan replacements and using that to justify the price despite lacking the features that made TItans special.
Forgetting of course that the titans replaced the x9x cards that preceded them.

But facts are bad when they conflict with the narrative.
Posted on Reply
#79
TumbleGeorge
FasolaAre you insane? The jacket will come with bodyguards to ensure its safe return. Each bodyguard will have FE 4090s to clobber anyone threatning the jacket.
Apparently we both can't work well with Photoshop or other image editor. Therefore we can only cry. But there should still be a person with the necessary abilities in a technology forum. /s
Posted on Reply
#80
Fasola
TumbleGeorgeApparently we both can't work well with Photoshop or other image editor. Therefore we can only cry. But there should still be a person with the necessary abilities in a technology forum. /s
Close enough.
Posted on Reply
#81
Lycanwolfen
Meh. I'm still happy with my rig works fine at 4k gaming for most of the games I play. Also just looks cooler and runs cooler and less power.
Posted on Reply
#83
Count von Schwalbe
Nocturnus Moderatus
Neo_MorpheusFirst delivery.

Water cooling to a new level...



Crossflow open circuit cooling tower (evaporative cooler), by the looks of it.
Posted on Reply
#84
WhoDecidedThat
OperandiTime to ratify the PCIE graphics slot standard to support these cards. Huge GPU dies are not going away and with performance directly correlating with temperature heat these massive coolers are here to stay.
FTFY

Remember the time when everyone made fun of GTX 480 for consuming over 220 watts where the GTX 285 consumed less than 130 watts.

The growth in power appetite of processors is unreal.



We used to have so many sub-100 watt cards back then.
Posted on Reply
#85
vmarv
LycanwolfenMeh. I'm still happy with my rig works fine at 4k gaming for most of the games I play. Also just looks cooler and runs cooler and less power.
Specs please, now I want to know. 2x1080s? :rockout:
Posted on Reply
#86
Operandi
WhoDecidedThatWe used to have so many sub-100 watt cards back then.
~100 watt cards is what the standard was built around, the standard for desktop hardware is kludgy as fuck right now. It would be like if Ford kept using the same body from Mustang from the 60s and dropped in a 700+ HP engine from the modern day GT500.
Posted on Reply
#87
Gmr_Chick
Y'all in here need to stop complaining about a GPU that may or may not come into existence and stop acting like it's a "gamerz card" that you're gonna go out and buy.

This card ain't a toy for gamerz with small weenies but big pockets, only interested in their e-peen -- that's what the 4090 is for - This card, I'd argue, is for the prosumer market space - digital/3D professionals and the like. You know, people who would truly put that beast to good use, rather than simply brag about it on the internet.

Good to see TITAN mentioned again. Hope it turns out to be true.
Posted on Reply
#88
ThrashZone
Hi,
Yeah how does it mine is all that matters :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#89
evernessince
TheinsanegamerNForgetting of course that the titans replaced the x9x cards that preceded them.

But facts are bad when they conflict with the narrative.
There were two x90 cards before the first Titan card, the 590 and 690. Both of which were dual GPU cards.

To say they were replaced by the Titan cards isn't entirely accurate either.
Posted on Reply
#90
wolf
Better Than Native
Vayra86Stop reposting bullshit please.
The irony of this statement in a thread where TPU has reposted MLID 'bullshit'
Posted on Reply
#91
mechtech
Waiting for the Nvidia Titan that I can put my pc inside the cooler. ;)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 06:47 PST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts