Monday, January 8th 2024

Intel Fattens the U-segment with "Raptor Lake Refresh" Based Core Series 1 Processors

Intel's current generation mobile processor product stack is vast, to say the least. In Q4-2023, the company launched its Core Ultra "Meteor Lake" mobile processors spanning the U-segment (7 W to 28 W), and H-segment (35 W to 45 W). Today, the company capped the upper end of the stack with the 14th Gen Core HX-series mobile processors based on "Raptor Lake Refresh," which dial up core counts to 8P+16E. And now, the company is adding more choice to the U-segment with the Core Processor Series 1, based on a lower core-count variant of the "Raptor Lake Refresh" architecture.

The Core Processor Series 1 follows the same nomenclature as the Core Ultra, where the "Ultra" denotes the latest "Meteor Lake" architecture. Processor model numbering and case badges are similar between Core Processor Series 1 and Core Ultra, except the lack of the "Ultra" brand extension. These chips are built on the monolithic "Raptor Lake Refresh" dies on the Intel 7 foundry node, and lack innovations such as the Low-power Island cores, 3D Performance Hybrid architecture, the all important AI Boost and on-silicon NPU; as well as that 2x faster Arc Xe-LPG integrated graphics, but use existing combinations of "Raptor Cove" and "Gracemont" CPU cores, along with older Xe-LP graphics with up to 96 EU; and a mostly similar I/O.
The Intel Core Processor 1 series U-segment is based on the smallest variant of "Raptor Lake Refresh," which physically features a 2P+8E core configuration. Each of the two P-cores has 1.25 MB of L2 cache, each of the two E-core clusters has 2 MB of L2 cache; while the two P-cores and E-core clusters share a 12 MB L3 cache. The PCIe interface is truncated, too. The CPU die puts out two PCIe Gen 4 x4 connections that are meant for NVMe storage devices, while the on-package PCH die puts out just 12 PCIe Gen 3 lanes. Notebook designers can implement Thunderbolt 4 with up to four ports. The platform also gets Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 using discrete WLAN cards. The memory interface is dual-channel DDR4, dual-channel DDR5, and LPDDR5(x) at speeds of up to 5200 MT/s. All three processor models Intel is launching today feature a base power of 15 W, and a maximum turbo power of 55 W.

The three processor models are Core 7 150U, Core 5 120U, and Core 3 100U. Both the 150U and 120U get a maxed out core configuration of 2P+8E with 12 MB of L3 cache, but differ with clock speeds and iGPU configuration. The 150U ticks at up to 5.40 GHz boost for the P-cores, and up to 4.00 GHz boost for the E-cores, with a maxed out iGPU that has 96 EU (6 Xe cores) clocked at 1.30 GHz.

The Core 5 120U has the same 2P+8E CPU core configuration, but clocked lower than that of the 150U. The P-core boost is set at up to 5.00 GHz, and the E-core boost at 3.80 GHz. The iGPU is cut down to 80 EU (5 Xe cores), and clocked at 1.25 GHz. The Core 3 100U gets the same iGPU configuration as the 120U, but its CPU core count is cut down to 2P+4E, L3 cache reduced to 10 MB, and CPU core clock speeds lowered—up to 4.70 GHz for the P-cores, and up to 3.30 GHz for the E-cores.

Notebooks based on the Core U-series (100U) should begin rolling out within Q1-2024.
Add your own comment

34 Comments on Intel Fattens the U-segment with "Raptor Lake Refresh" Based Core Series 1 Processors

#26
lexluthermiester
xorbeAm I the only that just wants a regular daily driver laptop and thinks 4c/8t is fine for some Firefox and MS Office?
You're a practical thinker and while not a alone, you're a bit rare.
Posted on Reply
#27
nageme
Яid!culousOwOIntel behaving like USB-IF...
More like Xbox Series X.

If it were USB-like it'd include reconning, like Gen15 i7-13700 v1.0.
Posted on Reply
#28
ratirt
2+8 would mean 2p+8e? Only 2p cores that is not so good. Obviously it is going to work but 2p cores is a bit to low for my taste.

I see a never-ending story about the naming problem. Honestly I wouldn't care less about naming which for this product is not problematic to pronounce or say. Arguments like, people would get confused or average joe wont know what to buy is pointless and has no merit. Always do research for product you are interested with and see other competing products to see which one will suit you better. Also, naming for every individual can be different because of likes and dislikes. It is better to focus on what the product is giving not how it's called.
Posted on Reply
#29
lexluthermiester
ratirt2+8 would mean 2p+8e? Only 2p cores that is not so good.
But it's not so bad either, especially for ultra-mobile or ultra small form factor.
Posted on Reply
#30
ratirt
lexluthermiesterBut it's not so bad either, especially for ultra-mobile or ultra small form factor.
I'm not saying it's bad. I'm just saying that having a 4p cores for the ultra small mobile from my perspective is a must. I dont think I ask for much though.
We all know how ecores perform and I'm not so fond of these especially, if you get them in expense of the pcores and that is clearly happening here. It would have been better to go 4p+2e/4e in my opinion. I guess the advertisement would not be as good since it is better to advertise for 10c instead of 6c or 8c.
Posted on Reply
#31
lexluthermiester
ratirtI'm just saying that having a 4p cores for the ultra small mobile from my perspective is a must.
The thing is, you might be underestimating just how effective the 2p+8e config can be. The Ecore might be the lesser of the cores, but they're not crap. In fact an all Ecore CPU would be a very reasonable model and would perform well. Then there is the perspective of an all Pcore CPU model. Jeff over at Craft Computing has an interesting take on a Xeon model made up of only Pcores. The result was solid, but less than stellar without the Ecores, especially at that price-point.
Posted on Reply
#32
ratirt
lexluthermiesterThe thing is, you might be underestimating just how effective the 2p+8e config can be. The Ecore might be the lesser of the cores, but they're not crap. In fact an all Ecore CPU would be a very reasonable model and would perform well. Then there is the perspective of an all Pcore CPU model. Jeff over at Craft Computing has an interesting take on a Xeon model made up of only Pcores. The result was solid, but less than stellar without the Ecores, especially at that price-point.
The price point and ecores here connect with AMD's server cpus offers which have way more cores. The ecores and higher core count for Intel, also justifies the price they are asking for it. I think, if you consider that and the advertisement again, hybrid for Intel is a must otherwise they lose on the core count and MT and price for the product front with AMD. You need to stay competitive and I think that is why Intel is doing it. Also, I have not mentioned power as you see but that is a different story.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 16th, 2024 04:11 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts