Monday, April 28th 2025

ASUSTOR Commits to Keeping NAS Devices Open and Unlocked

Recent trends in the NAS market and general tech market has shown a propensity to lock down their devices to prevent you from using the device you paid for as you see fit. We at ASUSTOR do not believe in locking down your NAS device. As such, all ASUSTOR NAS devices come in an unlocked state. Today, ASUSTOR is announcing its intention to continue to maintain its devices in an unlocked state for maximum freedom.

Owning Your Products!
In recent years, companies across the tech industry have announced tighter and tighter vendor lock-in requirements that are largely arbitrary in nature. This has been in the form of putting software locks that disallow the use of unauthorized software or peripherals on devices you purchase with your hard earned money. Examples of this include companies forcing use of in-house branded hardware like hard drives in a NAS, locking out third party operating systems and apps not approved by the vendor This is part of a general trend towards disposable technology, vendor lock-in, planned obsolescence, and anti-consumer practices all at an unnecessary expense to you, the consumer. At ASUSTOR, we believe that you own the hardware you purchase, and as such, ASUSTOR NAS devices come in an unlocked state. ASUSTOR NAS devices do not place arbitrary restrictions on your use of the device, while using a non-approved drive on NAS devices with vendor lock-in policies can cause error messages or loss of features like building a RAID pool or knowledge of drive health and more.
ASUSTOR tests numerous third party components for compatibility and maintains a compatibility list that helps ensure parts picked work well with the NAS for the best experience, but is not a list of approved drives. Any drive designed for the supported interfaces inside an ASUSTOR NAS should theoretically function inside an ASUSTOR NAS. Despite an inability to guarantee functionality for every drive on the market, ASUSTOR will not put arbitrary limits as to what drives you decide on using. ASUSTOR recommends using components on the compatibility list for a better experience, but does not believe in treating its customers like children.

Going Green
Another side effect of vendor lock-in is disposability. Because ASUSTOR NAS devices do not lock you in, this means longer longevity as there is no risk of losing functionality due to the termination of manufacturing of in-house drives. As long as drives are still being manufactured, your NAS will still be fully functional. ASUSTOR NAS devices also are unlocked for alternate operating systems, giving you full control over your device, even when hardware support ends, while ASUSTOR does not provide support for alternate operating systems, it still gives you the power to choose. This helps prevent unnecessary disposal of toxic materials into landfills, thereby creating more pollution, allowing all of us to create a greener planet for all.

It's Just About not Being Difficult
ASUSTOR believes that improving the experience is key to a good and holistic storage solution. Replaceable components like hard drives, SSDs, and RAM come in different speeds, capacities, and prices. Being locked into your device means that you have less choice as to how to customize your NAS which means, less opportunities to save money, save power, increase performance, or increase capacity. Sometimes availability is an issue and the specifications you want might not even be available. As an example, the largest hard drive on the market today is 36 TB while in-house drives of devices suffering from vendor lock-in may not be up to date with the latest technologies. This means on a ten bay ASUSTOR NAS, you'll be able to add 360 TB of storage while those devices suffering from vendor lock-in may not be able to use that much capacity due to their arbitrary limits. Due to this, we here at ASUSTOR don't believe in telling you how to use your devices and customer satisfaction always remains our number one priority.
Source: ASUSTOR
Add your own comment

9 Comments on ASUSTOR Commits to Keeping NAS Devices Open and Unlocked

#1
BArms
Pretty stupid decision by Synology. The NAS problem is largely solved, there isn't really much more one can do featurewise with them, so inevitably some companies in this space start exhibiting rent-seeking behavior. It's really rabid in the backup software industry too, although I saw Acronis recently brought back perpetual licenses of True Image though on the server backup side they all charge insane premiums. Macrium had perpetual licenses until recently. What changed, what new costs did they all incur to force them to a subscription model? Nothing, it's a solved problem with very low support costs for basic backup software. My advice to anyone so-inclined, make a competing backup software that allows restoration to dissimilar hardware, without all the stupid bells and whistles, you'll make a small fortune.
Posted on Reply
#2
TheLostSwede
News Editor
BArmsPretty stupid decision by Synology. The NAS problem is largely solved, there isn't really much more one can do featurewise with them, so inevitably some companies in this space start exhibiting rent-seeking behavior. It's really rabid in the backup software industry too, although I saw Acronis recently brought back perpetual licenses of True Image though on the server backup side they all charge insane premiums. Macrium had perpetual licenses until recently. What changed, what new costs did they all incur to force them to a subscription model? Nothing, it's a solved problem with very low support costs for basic backup software. My advice to anyone so-inclined, make a competing backup software that allows restoration to dissimilar hardware, without all the stupid bells and whistles, you'll make a small fortune.
It's all about making the share holders happy and to do that, you need to make more money every quarter. What Synology did, was to find a new way of making reoccurring revenue. If it's a good way or not, is up to their customers to decide.
Posted on Reply
#3
Bagerklestyne
TheLostSwedeIt's all about making the share holders happy and to do that, you need to make more money every quarter. What Synology did, was to find a new way of making reoccurring revenue. If it's a good way or not, is up to their customers to decide.
Well this customer already made his decision. Off to Terramaster and I'm going to see if I can run HexOS on it.
Posted on Reply
#4
Scrizz
I just run TrueNAS and my own hardware.
Posted on Reply
#5
Wye
BagerklestyneWell this customer already made his decision. Off to Terramaster and I'm going to see if I can run HexOS on it.
HexOS runs TrueNAS.

I was hyped a few years ago by TrueNAS and now I find my NAS is completely deprecated and zero software upgrades are possible anymore on anything at all. They force all users to switch to scale which cannot be migrated to for all configurations and running software.

Also the whole user-friendly wizard UI is a pipedream, Unix is Unix, if you plan to do anything else except that 1 scenario out of trillions that is supported by the wizzard, you will need to open a shell and run commands.
Posted on Reply
#6
TheLostSwede
News Editor
BagerklestyneWell this customer already made his decision. Off to Terramaster and I'm going to see if I can run HexOS on it.
If nothing else, it should be able to run OMV, as it's pretty lightweight.
Posted on Reply
#7
Sort_of_Grim
If and when my current NAS kicks the bucket I will absolutely not go for Synology again.
Posted on Reply
#8
Octavean
I still run my old Synology DS1815+. It's still running fine but it's days are numbered since Synology DSM has a limited upgrade path on the hardware beyond 7.x and its hardware ( Intel C2000 series Atom SoC) was anemic even when it was new. Synology also has irrational dedication to 1GbE as a baseline and that simply won't stand. I since moved on to a QNAP TS-653D (6 bay / 10GbE upgrade) and a new UGreen DXP8800 Plus 8 bay NAS with Intel i5 1235U (10 cores / 12 threads) dual 10GbE. I do miss Synology DSM but the OS isn't worth the downside of buying Synology IMO. IMO the UGreen DXP8800 Plus is the best NAS I've ever owned,....hands down. Yes UGOS needs some work but I was willing to give it a go and it does about ~%90 to ~%95 of what I want an OS to do.

IMO, Synology seems to be catering to the Enterprise market and some degree of hardware lock-in might not be so persona non grata there. However, in the retail / SOHO arena it's basically unacceptable IMO.

Edit:

Anyway, good on Asustor for taking a stand but it does feel a bit performative and timed to take advantage of Synology's misstep.
Posted on Reply
#9
Bagerklestyne
OctaveanI still run my old Synology DS1815+. It's still running fine but it's days are numbered since Synology DSM has a limited upgrade path on the hardware beyond 7.x and its hardware ( Intel C2000 series Atom SoC) was anemic even when it was new. Synology also has irrational dedication to 1GbE as a baseline and that simply won't stand. I since moved on to a QNAP TS-653D (6 bay / 10GbE upgrade) and a new UGreen DXP8800 Plus 8 bay NAS with Intel i5 1235U (10 cores / 12 threads) dual 10GbE. I do miss Synology DSM but the OS isn't worth the downside of buying Synology IMO. IMO the UGreen DXP8800 Plus is the best NAS I've ever owned,....hands down. Yes UGOS needs some work but I was willing to give it a go and it does about ~%90 to ~%95 of what I want an OS to do.
I had a DS1815+ till it carked it, currently sitting on a DS1821+

Biggest reason for me to look elsewhere is Synology's unwillingness to support 30tb drives without a massive premium (20tb drives are 800ish, but the Synology branded drives are nearly double that) and (in aud) the price leap from 8 to 12 bays is almost double, for DS2422+ money (empty) I can get a Terramaster T12-423 and about 30tb of drive space.

What are your feelings on the shortcomings of UGOS (I did look at UGreen)

I'm a super basic bitch, I just need raid 6, network shares and docker to run a pihole and maybe a lightweight torrent client (I seed some Amiga projects so it doesn't need to be a full fat build of anything) with ups support for clean shutdowns in a power disruption.
Posted on Reply
Nov 14th, 2026 20:13 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts