Wednesday, October 29th 2025

Battlefield RedSec Gets "Mostly Negative" Steam Reviews Because of Comparisons to Battlefield 6

Not even a day after the launch of the free-to-play battle royale Battlefield RedSec, the game has already experienced its first controversy, with wave of negative reviews dropping RedSec's review rating to "Mostly Negative" on Steam, with a mere 38% of the reviews recommending the game. While the base gameplay of RedSec has apparently sat well with many gamers, with many praising the destruction mechanics and the large open maps, many players seem rather upset about a number of issues largely related to how the free-to-play game interacts with and compares to the main Battlefield 6 game. The main take-away is that gamers who bought Battlefield 6 seem to feel like they are being pressured into playing RedSec and that it appears as though DICE and EA invested significantly more time and resources into RedSec than Battlefield 6.

One recurring complaint is that Battlefield 6's weekly challenges are tied to game modes in RedSec, while other players seem upset that there is more variety in RedSec when it comes to vehicle options. The same appears to be true for the map and game design in RedSec, which features a larger map than Battlefield 6—even EA called the RedSec map the largest in any Battlefield game. That size offers players more freedom and perhaps even strategic advantages. "Oh wow a nice big map with lots of POIs and flanks. If only we could get something like this for the main game," reads one review. Complaints also abound, both on Reddit and in the Steam reviews, about bugs and the game's lack of polish, but those issues are likely to be resolved in time. Despite the complaints, Battlefield RedSec is currently eighth in SteamDB's top sales charts, with the Season 1 battle pass coming in fifth place.
Sources: SteamDB, Steam
Add your own comment

12 Comments on Battlefield RedSec Gets "Mostly Negative" Steam Reviews Because of Comparisons to Battlefield 6

#1
cinemaware
Typical internet logic. "I'm pissed off with stuff going on in BF6 so I'll give a bad review to BF6:RS". Makes total sense /s
Posted on Reply
#2
RejZoR
cinemawareTypical internet logic. "I'm pissed off with stuff going on in BF6 so I'll give a bad review to BF6:RS". Makes total sense /s
It's also funny that every public outcry over shit in games, the only that actually affects things is now always called "review bombing". Do people think whining about something on Reddit or forums actually makes a difference? It doesn't. Giving a game a bad rating and it's universally applied on a large store like Steam, developers will absolutely give a shit about criticisms.

This isn't "review bombing", this is just a public petition that actually has a big impact, unlike other "petitions" websites that are just signatures that go into a void...
Posted on Reply
#3
Hecate91
This isn't "review bombing" as review bombing would be reviews falsely bashing on the game, complaints seem to be valid especially with size of maps in the main game, also with challenges being tied to other challenge objectives.
Too many of the maps are small run and gun maps with only a few points which makes the game feel too much like a CoD title, many of the challenges are tied to other challenges which makes you complete them to get a new one, in addition to weapons having over a dozen unlocks and none of the attachments carry over to another weapon type which should be able to use the same sight or grip.
Posted on Reply
#4
Camm
The base game is bad, released 6 months too early with entire chunks of the game broken, why did people think the F2P Battle Royale COD clone was somehow going to make that situation better?
Posted on Reply
#5
phints
BF6 was an outstanding launch, been a blast to play and haven't had a single crash or real issue in about 40 hours online. This is easily the best new fps since PUBG in 2017....

A week later we have this, what are the braindead morons of the internet crying about now?
Posted on Reply
#6
Space Lynx
Astronaut
I am only rank 7, but I enjoyed REDSEC last night. had some fun moments actually, where i saved this guy, then he saved me later in the game and went out of his way for redeploy station, lol
Posted on Reply
#7
Lionheart
phintsBF6 was an outstanding launch, been a blast to play and haven't had a single crash or real issue in about 40 hours online. This is easily the best new fps since PUBG in 2017....

A week later we have this, what are the braindead morons of the internet crying about now?
Just because your experience has been good doesn't mean it's perfect for others and all you can do is label them braindead morons? Not very opened minded of you.
Posted on Reply
#8
sepheronx
I'm bloody angry here.

I can't believe it. Whatever is wrong with people? I just cannot stand this nonsense. How can they do this to us? I will boycott (insert thing I'm supposed to be mad about and makers of) forever now. Thank God I am poor and can't whatever it is, even if it's free.
Posted on Reply
#9
Scrizz
I've enjoyed Redsec and can also see why people who got BF6 (myself included) would be questioning EA. The Redsec map looks beautiful. There are airstrikes, artillery strikes, plus a huge map. These are things that are missing from the main BF6 entry that have been part of previous BF entries. It's obviously not a technical limitation since they were able to make a 100 player giant map with the previously stated features. Comparing the new Season 1 map to Redsec it is clear where the money went.
Posted on Reply
#10
Cpt.Jank
Hecate91This isn't "review bombing" as review bombing would be reviews falsely bashing on the game, complaints seem to be valid especially with size of maps in the main game, also with challenges being tied to other challenge objectives.
Too many of the maps are small run and gun maps with only a few points which makes the game feel too much like a CoD title, many of the challenges are tied to other challenges which makes you complete them to get a new one, in addition to weapons having over a dozen unlocks and none of the attachments carry over to another weapon type which should be able to use the same sight or grip.
Your (and other's) criticism of the "review bombing" framing is correct. I've updated the post.
Posted on Reply
#11
cinemaware
Cpt.JankYour (and other's) criticism of the "review bombing" framing is correct. I've updated the post.
RedSec is getting negative reviews only because people are upset with Battlefield 6. By everyone's admission, even the complainers', RedSec is pretty good and the problems are with BF6. Meanwhile, the former has Mixed and the latter Mostly Positive reviews. This absolutely is "falsely bashing the game", and the first headline was correct - it is review bombing of the worst kind.

It probably won't really matter because people will play RS anyway - I spent several hours with it yesterday and had a blast - but this kind of idiotic behaviour should always be opposed.
Posted on Reply
#12
Space Lynx
Astronaut
i just played a few more matches of redsec just now, had a blast. came in 5th place in duo's. not bad for free.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 11th, 2026 19:59 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts