Wednesday, February 25th 2026

LG Puts Up its 52-inch 5K2K Monitor for Pre-Order

Just ahead of CES, LG announced a range of new monitors and now, the biggest one of the new models, the UltraGear EVO 52G930B is available for pre-order. Back then, LG didn't reveal much in terms of details about its 52-inch giant, but the company did reveal the 5120 x 2160 pixel resolution, the 240 Hz refresh rate and the 1000R curvature. Now we know that the 52G930B will also support DisplayHDR 600 and 95% of the DCI-P3 colour gamut. The panel is likely to cause some disappointment, as it's a VA panel with a contrast ratio of 4000:1 and a 1 ms grey to grey response time. Unfortunately LG doesn't provide any details with regards to what type of backlight is being used, but HDR600 doesn't require FALD. The 52G930B also has AMD FreeSync Premium support and a range of built in gaming features.

Somewhat disappointingly, the LG 52G930B only sports a single DisplayPort 2.1 input, but the two HDMI 2.1 ports also support the full resolution and refresh rate on offer here. The USB Type-C port seems to still be limited to DP 1.4 with DSC and possibly lower chroma subsampling, as even though it can support the full resolution, it tops out at 200 Hz. The monitor also has a pair of USB 3.0 Type-A ports and a headphone jack that supports DTS Headphone:X. There's also a pair of built in stereo speakers and some RGB lights around the rear. As with many other of LG's more premium monitors, KVM support and Picture-in-Picture and Picture-by-Picture is supported. Finally the stand is height adjustable and the display can be tilted and swiveled. LG is asking for US$1999.99 and the monitor is said to start shipping around the 22nd of March.
Source: LG Electronics US
Add your own comment

12 Comments on LG Puts Up its 52-inch 5K2K Monitor for Pre-Order

#1
bonehead123
Hummm.....

A 52"/5K screen for $2K......interesting, but too bad it's a VA panel......

I wait on the reviews, but obviously this was not meant to be a flagship model, which would have used an OLED or mini-OLED would have fit that title better...

Oh well, whatchagonnado :D
Posted on Reply
#2
Chrispy_
The price kills it.

This would be an appealing $500-750 monitor, but as it stands you can get two 32" 4K displays of this calibre for about $250 each. People will pay a bit more to remove the bezel between the two monitors, but not that much more, and this isn't even 32:9, it's 21:9.
Posted on Reply
#3
Legacy-ZA
Chrispy_The price kills it.

This would be an appealing $500-750 monitor, but as it stands you can get two 32" 4K displays of this calibre for about $250 each. People will pay a bit more to remove the bezel between the two monitors, but not that much more, and this isn't even 32:9, it's 21:9.
Yep, I don't care what resolution it's rocking, that price for a VA? lol, nah.

Anyways, better just to go for an OLED TV at this point. Gamers are way to kind with their wallets, and it shows, people keep buying expensive trash. Gamer chairs anyone? lol
Posted on Reply
#5
trsttte
It's expensive because it's huge, but there are other cheaper options with much better connectivity, i.e. the 40'' 5k2k from either Dell, Lenovo or LG themselves - all with thunderbolt and IPS panels. Only 120hz instead of 240hz and far from 1ms response time - but then again so is this one outside marketing materials
Posted on Reply
#6
DeathtoGnomes
hmmm the fact that its pre-order doesnt give me confidence in a good product.
Posted on Reply
#7
TheLostSwede
News Editor
trsttteIt's expensive because it's huge, but there are other cheaper options with much better connectivity, i.e. the 40'' 5k2k from either Dell, Lenovo or LG themselves - all with thunderbolt and IPS panels. Only 120hz instead of 240hz and far from 1ms response time - but then again so is this one outside marketing materials
Dell also has this one, which is the same size, but has "6K" 120 Hz ISP panel, but it's another US$900.
www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell-ultrasharp-52-thunderbolt-hub-monitor-u5226kw/apd/210-bthw/monitors-monitor-accessories
DeathtoGnomeshmmm the fact that its pre-order doesnt give me confidence in a good product.
LG has done that for several of its higher-end gaming monitors recently.
Posted on Reply
#8
Chrispy_
trstttefar from 1ms response time - but then again so is this one outside marketing materials
Yeah, I'm a huge fan of VA panels for their contrast ratio but average G2G response times on a decent panel are still ~3-5ms. The best panels are genuinely excellent and make IPS monitors pointless by having perfect pixel response across the full range whilst also offering native 4000:1 contrast before FALD increases that, instead of the godawful 800:1 of so many IPS displays (below is an expensive VA - Samsung Odyssey Neo G7, just to silence the VA haters)



However, a lot of cheaper VA panels, including every LG VA panel ever reviewed have the basic, dumb overdrive that you're used to with low-end VA that has black smear with 0%-20% response times of >10ms. For their low asking price, they are still compelling gaming options as you get near-OLED contrast levels, immersive curve radius (useful on anything larger than 27 inches) that IPS simply cannot do, and with 0%-20% response times of ~10ms or so there's not enough black smear to ruin your day - you'll notice it if you specifically look for it, but it's not like it used to be in the bad old days when 0%-20% response times were over 30ms.

Posted on Reply
#9
Carlyle2020hs
I use a 50 inch VA TV Panel (an arms length away) and i dare to say that i can read my text clearer than on any OLED TVs i´ve tested.

Windows own "ClearType Tuner" seems to be broken for years now so i can´t fathom how OLED users handle text clarity concerning its windows-unfriendly sub-pixel layout?

For me currently it´s a battle between "text smear" (OLED) vs "fast moving smear" (VA)
Posted on Reply
#10
Chrispy_
Carlyle2020hsI use a 50 inch VA TV Panel (an arms length away) and i dare to say that i can read my text clearer than on any OLED TVs i´ve tested.

Windows own "ClearType Tuner" seems to be broken for years now so i can´t fathom how OLED users handle text clarity concerning its windows-unfriendly sub-pixel layout?

For me currently it´s a battle between "text smear" (OLED) vs "fast moving smear" (VA)
Cleartype is garbage if you don't have an RGB or BRG stripe. It fails at RGBW, or any quad-subpixel layout, and it fails at pentile or triad subpixel layouts.

In theory ClearType supports BGR but the "choose which text looks best" is a godawful way to choose and it's never really obvious if you've picked the right sequence because there are always 2-3 samples from that choice of six that look okay, just at different boldness, which has nothing to do with subpixel AA. I guess they're trying to work out your display gamma from those samples but that's a really difficult way to do it and always results in incorrect values.

At least you can ignore that bullshit "choose which text looks best" ambiguous mess by hardcoding the correct values into the registry for your display:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Avalon.Graphics\<displayName>
The keys don't exist until you've run the ClearType tuner once, and then you just need to modify the PixelStructure DWORD to 1 for RGB stripe and 2 for BGR.

Realistically, the issue is that Microsoft are DOGSHIT. Pentile displays first went mainstream in laptops back in 2012. OLED PC monitors launched at CES a decade ago and have been very common indeed for the last 5+ years. We know Microsoft don't care, can't fix, won't fix, and refuse to sort out the absolute clusterf*ck of a UI that's never been fully migrated from the Classic NT one that lasted up until Windows 7, but the RGB and BRG stripes that Cleartype supported 26 years ago need an update, and have needed an update for at least a whole decade.

Why doesn't Cleartype handle this?
Posted on Reply
#11
trsttte
Chrispy_The best panels are genuinely excellent and make IPS monitors pointless by having perfect pixel response across the full range whilst also offering native 4000:1 contrast before FALD increases that, instead of the godawful 800:1 of so many IPS displays (below is an expensive VA - Samsung Odyssey Neo G7, just to silence the VA haters)
Good VA for me automatically means Samsung, never saw a review from others brand where the conclusion didn't include "for the price...", which given how cheap IPS can be doesn't make sense to me.

Price is of course important, but I'll be stuck looking at the thing for multiple years, a smear fest full of overshoot artifacts is not an option.
Posted on Reply
#12
Dr. Dro
Unless you're looking to dodge yer TV loicence, might as well just buy an LG G5 for that kind of cash. It's 10 times this screen will ever be in terms of quality.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 14th, 2026 05:01 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts