Tuesday, June 23rd 2026

EA Exec Says 'AI Everything' Helps Creativity, Workflows and Pipelines

In October 2025, we reported on insider commentary by EA developers who claimed that AI tools had hampered productivity, despite the company having all but mandated the tech for over a year at that point. A survey conducted by Skillsearch in April found that developers thought AI hurt creativity in games. Now, speaking at a recent Game Business Live event, EA's president of enterprise development, Laura Miele, touched on AI tools and their impact on the output at EA, seemingly rebutting the aforementioned claims by developers working at the gaming giant. EA has been using AI for everything from coding to concept art, and even managerial work.

When addressing a question about whether AI tools could lead to shorter game development timelines, Miele said that "perhaps in some parts they will," going on to express that she is excited about the tech, given what she has seen of it. She explains that she's "always wanted to help our studio developers remove friction," and "wanted to be a hero to them." According to her, AI tools have removed "friction from our pipelines and our tools and our workflows," and led to quicker prototyping, "faster creativity, and shorter, faster conversations around creativity and coming to alignment." She attributes this accelerated workflow to a removal of "tedium" from the jobs of artists and developers.
News of Miele's proclamations about the benefits of AI comes hot on the heels of an analysis of Steam games that found that games that use generative AI tend to sell as much as 53% fewer units than those that did not. There also seems to be a growing divide in the gaming industry when it comes to the use of generative AI, with many developers rejecting it outright, others using it begrudgingly, and others still who see the same potential benefits as Miele.
Source: Eurogamer
Add your own comment

35 Comments on EA Exec Says 'AI Everything' Helps Creativity, Workflows and Pipelines

#1
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
Cpt.JankEA's president of enterprise development, Laura Miele, touched on AI tools and their impact on the output at EA, seemingly rebutting the aforementioned claims
You don’t say? Lmao.
Posted on Reply
#2
tsunami2311
EA, it in the game
EA, it in the AI

EA has systematically destroyed many Franchise from my childhood, maybe the can destroy them selves?

All jokes aside EA a shell of them selves, they are no long in it for the "love of games" like many other publishers
Posted on Reply
#3
_roman_
EA, Star wars jedi survivor, a free amd hardware reward for a purchase has shown me, how fragile the software quality was. constant crashes with amd radeon 7800xt in w11 pro. reproduceable bugs, do step a b c d , boom game crashed and i am back on the desktop. Half finished game wiht repetition contents and the ending was just a quick ending because they had no budget.

EA games are long gone, need for speed underground. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Need_for_Speed:_Underground


AI for sure will improve the visual and also the code quality. /sarcasm
Posted on Reply
#4
Hecate91
I take it this means games rushed out the door even faster, that customers will still be charged $80 for, with a bunch of predatory micro transactions now AI slop generated.
Posted on Reply
#5
FatherOBlivion
I'm not one to defend EA execs, but I'll mention the software company I work at we'd have a developer revolt on our hands if Codex or other AI tools were suddenly taken away. It's amazing how quickly AI tools have been integrated into workflows and proven their value. I imagine game development is much the same. Makes me wonder who those devs were who supposedly say AI "hampered productivity"? Doesn't make sense.
Posted on Reply
#6
Kwadratowicz
Trrrryt
AI helps Creativity Workflow and Pipelines of creative accounting...
Posted on Reply
#7
TheDeeGee
Honestly, if AI makes a better game than the slop the virtue signalers poop out i'm all for it.
Posted on Reply
#8
RejZoR
EA is now on my greatest shit list where only Ubisoft gloriously resides. Good job EA, keep on going. Only reason I even bought anything from EA was Need for Speed. Now that they discontinued longest running game franchise of all games for some fucked up reason I have absolutely zero incentive to buy anything from them. Good riddance.
Posted on Reply
#9
crazyotterhound
So Miele wanted to be a "hero" to the developers, seriously how do people write such absolute drivel it is pure cringe. I very much doubt any of the developers are pleased at the prospect of being forced to use Gen AI under the oversight of EA execs.
Posted on Reply
#10
Stacts
Not to disagree with any of that, the one thing AI won't help with is sales.
Posted on Reply
#11
TheGeekn°72
She explains that she's "always wanted to help our studio developers remove friction," and "wanted to be a hero to them."
Oversized ego much?
many developers rejecting it outright, others using it begrudgingly
you don't say...

look, we already have plenty of AI generated *code*, which, if the devs WANT to use, I don't mind, coding is one of the few applications of useful AI if that can assist them and cut down on development time

but miss me with that shit if that means they're adding AI generated content that isn't code...
Posted on Reply
#12
azrael
As long as they take my AI-created money, I'm good...
Posted on Reply
#13
Bwaze
Did you know that EA stands for Ertificial Antelligence?
Posted on Reply
#14
FreedomEclipse
~Technological Technocrat~
This smells like when they were pushing all these different studios to use their Frostbite Engine to make games.
Posted on Reply
#15
BSim500
At the very least, "we're putting more of the same AI in games that's causing hardware shortages that leaves many unable to upgrade to play games" comes across as completely tone-deaf as announcing "Great news! Here at EA we're adding in-game crypto-miners to our games" during peak mining boom GPU-shortage would have been... 🙄
Posted on Reply
#16
FreedomEclipse
~Technological Technocrat~
BSim500At the very least, "we're putting more of the same AI in games that's causing hardware shortages that leaves many unable to upgrade to play games" comes across as completely tone-deaf as announcing "Great news! Here at EA we're adding in-game crypto-miners to our games" during peak mining boom GPU-shortage would have been... 🙄
You know what gamers really need?? More NFT's

Posted on Reply
#17
mb194dc
EA are doing so well they're cost cutting all over before their sale to Saudi PIF.
Posted on Reply
#18
halcyon
I propose to replace EA execs with "AI". Surely the end result can't be any worse, right?
Posted on Reply
#19
Red Hood
Of course this has nothing to do with the investments in "ai" companies and infrastructure by the owners and is to make better quality and lower priced games for consumers
Posted on Reply
#20
Stacts
It has to be really weird to be an Animal Science major right now... To them, AI is Artificial Insemination.
Posted on Reply
#21
lexluthermiester
For EA to say this only shows more evidence that EA is as clueless and incompetent as it's been in the last 15years...
Posted on Reply
#22
L'Eliminateur
FatherOBlivionI'm not one to defend EA execs, but I'll mention the software company I work at we'd have a developer revolt on our hands if Codex or other AI tools were suddenly taken away. It's amazing how quickly AI tools have been integrated into workflows and proven their value. I imagine game development is much the same. Makes me wonder who those devs were who supposedly say AI "hampered productivity"? Doesn't make sense.
Pretty much the same, but my company had no internal dev team and now with AI we do, and it has opened the door to do stuff we couldn't dream of before(or would've taken orders of magnitude more than we spend on AI and years of development, we develop at breakneck speed now doing entire systems in days/weeks from scratch)

I'm tired of the AI luddites with their "ai slop ai slop" braindead chants, i don't give a f if the companies use AI, if they do good for them that means i get my game faster
Posted on Reply
#23
AGlezB
EA has been making slop for at least a decade. Getting people angry over AI is a good way to divert attention from the real issues they have so don't miss the forest for the trees.

Besides, like it or not AI is here to stay and once the dust settles the divide will be no bigger than the current artisanal vs. mass produced or organic vs. mass produced and we already know which side has won that argument for the last 12,000 or so years. Those not using AI will be less productive and efficient, a severe handicap for any business ouside (not for long) of a few specialiced fields. Getting angry over AI is pointless.
Posted on Reply
#24
Hecate91
L'EliminateurI'm tired of the AI luddites with their "ai slop ai slop" braindead chants, i don't give a f if the companies use AI, if they do good for them that means i get my game faster
By all means go ahead and buy the EA AI slop then, EA hasn't been successful in years with major titles like need for speed or battlefield, pushing the job to the slop generators instead of real people won't change things.
AGlezBEA has been making slop for at least a decade. Getting people angry over AI is a good way to divert attention from the real issues they have so don't miss the forest for the trees.

Besides, like it or not AI is here to stay and once the dust settles the divide will be no bigger than the current artisanal vs. mass produced or organic vs. mass produced and we already know which side has won that argument for the last 12,000 or so years. Those not using AI will be less productive and efficient, a severe handicap for any business ouside (not for long) of a few specialiced fields. Getting angry over AI is pointless.
I disagree, AI is now part of the problem, EA is still going to make slop but now it's going to be low effort cost cut AI slop.
Posted on Reply
#25
AGlezB
Hecate91I disagree, AI is now part of the problem, EA is still going to make slop but now it's going to be low effort cost cut AI slop.
Slop is slop. It doesn't matter how expensive it was to make and in that sense cheaper slop is less of a waste. Tell me which of these you'd rather hear:
  1. Our product is garbage but we made it in a couple of weeks for the price of a used car.
  2. Our product is garbage and it took half a decade and enough money to buy a full flight of F-35s.
AI is a useful tool; that is a fact. Whether you like it or not doesn't matter because the only ones who care are those that see value in paying extra for handcrafted products while carefully ignoring that the only things humans can craft by hand alone are balls of snow or mud. Everything else requires tools.

EDIT: A caveat to the above: idiocy. The effectiveness of a tool, any tool, is directly tied to the knowledge and expertise of the person using it. It doesn't matter how good a tool is if you put it in the hands of an idiot.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 14th, 2026 06:34 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts