Thursday, June 25th 2026

Qualcomm HBC Gen 1 Achieves 133 TB/s Bandwidth by Stacking LPDDR Memory

Yesterday, Qualcomm announced its High Bandwidth Compute (HBC) product, a memory-compute solution hybrid designed to replace traditional High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) and offer greater performance, efficiency, and throughput. HBC utilizes LPDDR memory, stacking them across multiple layers in a 3D vertical space and interconnecting them with through-silicon vias (TSVs). This approach provides better energy efficiency than traditional HBM, which stacks regular DDR in vertical layers, as the low-power DDR (LPDDR) chips consume less power while delivering similar bandwidth and capacity. Qualcomm has successfully stacked multiple LPDDR layers on top of each other, with the base of the HBC being a compute die that performs near-memory computation and offloads some processing from the main processor.

This technique is similar to what HBM4 memory currently does, with the base die being a logic die to better integrate compute solutions underneath for packet tracing and data preparation for entering and exiting HBM. However, Qualcomm aims to achieve higher efficiency and more optimized data movement, with a 6x increase in bandwidth per watt compared to the current HBM specification, likely HBM4. HBC Gen 1 achieved 133 TB/s of bandwidth on the AI250 accelerator card, a 18x increase over the LPDDR5X currently used in the AI200 card from Qualcomm. The company also claims there is a viable roadmap for using HBC across many Qualcomm AI accelerators, with HBC Gen 1 shipping with the AI250 AI accelerator in mid-2027. The next-generation HBC Gen 2 is expected to yield further significant gains in bandwidth.
Currently, it is unclear where Qualcomm plans to source the LPDDR memory, which LPDDR memory version is used in HBC, and where the company plans to package this. Qualcomm is known for manufacturing its Snapdragon SoCs at TSMC, but the compute die could be manufactured by any memory maker partnering for the HBC launch. The most logical choice is Samsung Foundry, which manufactures both LPDDR in-house and offers custom logic manufacturing. However, this has yet to be confirmed by Qualcomm.
Source: Qualcomm
Add your own comment

12 Comments on Qualcomm HBC Gen 1 Achieves 133 TB/s Bandwidth by Stacking LPDDR Memory

#1
TumbleGeorge
HBC Gen 1 achieved 133 TB/s of bandwidth on
I don't think that is physically possible.
Posted on Reply
#2
ncrs
TumbleGeorgeI don't think that is physically possible.
That's for the entire AI250 accelerator which has 786GB of RAM, but we don't know how many stacks of HBC it uses or how wide they are.
Posted on Reply
#3
Wirko
ncrsThat's for the entire AI250 accelerator which has 786GB of RAM, but we don't know how many stacks of HBC it uses or how wide they are.
133 TB/s = 1066 Tbit/s

At 10.7 Gbit/s per pin, the fastest that's available now, this would require a 100,000-bit wide data bus... and that seems much closer to impossible than to possible.

The processor's internal data bus would have to be incredibly wide as well.
Posted on Reply
#5
ncrs
Wirko133 TB/s = 1066 Tbit/s

At 10.7 Gbit/s per pin, the fastest that's available now, this would require a 100,000-bit wide data bus... and that seems much closer to impossible than to possible.

The processor's internal data bus would have to be incredibly wide as well.
Another issue is that their materials quote Effective Memory Bandwidth which might be some creative accounting by including Compute Die to/from HBC stack traffic and/or in-memory computation on HBC dies themselves.

In any case we'll have to wait for a proper whitepaper or device releases in 2027/2028. This is clearly PR information meant for investors.
Posted on Reply
#6
atomsymbol
Wirko133 TB/s = 1066 Tbit/s

At 10.7 Gbit/s per pin, the fastest that's available now, this would require a 100,000-bit wide data bus... and that seems much closer to impossible than to possible.

The processor's internal data bus would have to be incredibly wide as well.
The computation isn't happening in the SoC chip, but in the compute die directly below the memory stack. The compute die might contain 10000 'tiny cores' or more (I was unable to find any spec sheet describing the 'compute die'). The 'tiny core' might not even be Turing-complete, it only needs to be good at accelerating AI workloads. In the end, it is likely that AI inevitably leads to in-memory computing.
Posted on Reply
#7
Denver
It doesn't have to be possible; Qualcomm is playing the same game as Musk, promising impossible things to get money from fools.

If that were possible, it would further devastate the electronics market, since stacked memory in the HBM way uses many more chips and has terrible yields.
Posted on Reply
#8
atomsymbol
DenverIt doesn't have to be possible; Qualcomm is playing the same game as Musk, promising impossible things to get money from fools.
What is more likely:
  • The people buying those Qualcomm racks are technology experts
  • The people buying those Qualcomm racks are easy to fool and manipulate
DenverIf that were possible, it would further devastate the electronics market, since stacked memory in the HBM way uses many more chips and has terrible yields.
In other words, you don't like where the world is going/heading. The question is: can you change the trajectory and think of a better path that would appeal to people?
Posted on Reply
#9
TumbleGeorge
ncrsAnother issue is that their materials quote Effective Memory Bandwidth which might be some creative accounting by including Compute Die to/from HBC stack traffic and/or in-memory computation on HBC dies themselves.

In any case we'll have to wait for a proper whitepaper or device releases in 2027/2028. This is clearly PR information meant for investors.
Yes, definitely summing the speeds of all available individual memory cells cannot show the throughput to the accelerator chip logic, nor even inside this memory itself. If I'm not mistaken, even if it were possible, the accelerator L caches are slower, and they are even closer and even inside the chip logic itself. There is not even a manufactured optical interface with such speed yet, although there are laboratory achievements.
Posted on Reply
#10
Tom.699
Wirko133 TB/s = 1066 Tbit/s

At 10.7 Gbit/s per pin, the fastest that's available now, this would require a 100,000-bit wide data bus... and that seems much closer to impossible than to possible.

The processor's internal data bus would have to be incredibly wide as well.
I think "bus" is kind of that wide.
Not exactly clear, typical marketing to get largest possible number on slide, but I believe this is bandwidth between memory and bottom layer (compute accelerator) connected with tons of these vias.
From what I found, when it needs to talk to outside, bandwidth is actually much lower than HBM
Posted on Reply
#11
atomsymbol
Wirko133 TB/s = 1066 Tbit/s

At 10.7 Gbit/s per pin, the fastest that's available now, this would require a 100,000-bit wide data bus... and that seems much closer to impossible than to possible.
This page is suggesting that a single AI250 Ultra accelerator card is expected/estimated to have 4 chips and that the card supposedly uses LPDDR6X of an unspecified frequency (see also: wccftech.com/samsung-next-gen-lpddr6x-memory-samples-already-delivered-to-qualcomm/) ... so your estimate of 100,000 could be off by a factor of 10.
Posted on Reply
#12
kondamin
TumbleGeorgeI don't think that is physically possible.
maybe it's running at an actual 5Ghz so 20MT
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 12th, 2026 04:39 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts